HASIL UJI VALIDITAS INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN

Ukuran: px

Mulai penontonan dengan halaman:

Download "HASIL UJI VALIDITAS INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN"

Veronika Sudirman
6 tahun lalu
Tontonan:

1 HASIL UJI ITAS ISTRUME PEELITIA P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 Totp (**) (**) (**) (**) (*) (**) (**) Keputusan TIDAK TIDAK TIDAK TIDAK TIDAK TIDAK

2 P14 P15 P16 P17 P18 P19 P20 P21 P22 P23 P24 P25 P (*) (**) (*) (**) (**) (**) (**) (**) (**).003 TIDAK TIDAK TIDAK TIDAK ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

3 HASIL SPSS PEELITIA A. Karakteristik Responden Frequencies Table kelas Valid X XI XII usia Valid

4 usia Valid Jenis_kelamin Valid L P Riwayat_konjungtivitis Valid tidak

5 ya sumber_informasi Valid keluarga/orang lain media cetak media elektronik penyuluhan/sosialisasi tidak dapat

6 Valid baik cukup kurang penanganan Valid diberi air kencing diberi air rebusan daun sirih diberi air rebusan daun sirih atau obat mata diberi obat mata diberi obat tetes mata dibersihkan

7 dibersihkan dan diberi obat tetes mata didiamkan ditutup matanya istirahat kedokter minum air kelapa muda obat Valid air biasa air kencing pagi hari air rebusan daun sirih air rebusan daun sirih, salep mata antibiotik cendo xitrol insto

8 insto dan air rebusan daun sirih insto dan bawang putih o'ring obat dari dokter obat dari dokter,air daun sirih dan air kencing di propolis rohto salep mata tidak menggunakan obat tidak tahu namanya visto

9 Crosstabs usia * Crosstabulation baik sedang kurang Total usia 15 Count usia 33.3% 55.6% 11.1% 100.0% 12.5% 17.4% 10.0% 14.3% % of Total 4.8% 8.0% 1.6% 14.3% 16 Count usia 36.8% 46.3% 16.8% 100.0% 36.5% 38.3% 40.0% 37.8% % of Total 13.9% 17.5% 6.4% 37.8% 17 Count usia 40.2% 43.3% 16.5% 100.0% 40.6% 36.5% 40.0% 38.6% % of Total 15.5% 16.7% 6.4% 38.6% 18 Count usia 43.5% 39.1% 17.4% 100.0% 10.4% 7.8% 10.0% 9.2%

10 % of Total 4.0% 3.6% 1.6% 9.2% Total Count usia 38.2% 45.8% 15.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 38.2% 45.8% 15.9% 100.0% Jenis_kelamin * Crosstabulation baik sedang kurang Total Jenis_kelamin L Count Jenis_kelamin 35.2% 44.8% 20.0% 100.0% 38.5% 40.9% 52.5% 41.8% % of Total 14.7% 18.7% 8.4% 41.8% P Count Jenis_kelamin 40.4% 46.6% 13.0% 100.0% 61.5% 59.1% 47.5% 58.2% % of Total 23.5% 27.1% 7.6% 58.2% Total Count Jenis_kelamin 38.2% 45.8% 15.9% 100.0%

11 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 38.2% 45.8% 15.9% 100.0% Riwayat_konjungtivitis * Crosstabulation baik sedang kurang Total Riwayat_konjungtivitis tidak Count Riwayat_konjungtivitis 34.5% 44.0% 21.4% 100.0%.2% 32.2% 45.0% 33.5% % of Total 11.6% 14.7% 7.2% 33.5% ya Count Riwayat_konjungtivitis 40.1% 46.7% 13.2% 100.0% 69.8% 67.8% 55.0% 66.5% % of Total 26.7% 31.1% 8.8% 66.5% Total Count Riwayat_konjungtivitis 38.2% 45.8% 15.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

12 Riwayat_konjungtivitis * Crosstabulation baik sedang kurang Total Riwayat_konjungtivitis tidak Count Riwayat_konjungtivitis 34.5% 44.0% 21.4% 100.0%.2% 32.2% 45.0% 33.5% % of Total 11.6% 14.7% 7.2% 33.5% ya Count Riwayat_konjungtivitis 40.1% 46.7% 13.2% 100.0% 69.8% 67.8% 55.0% 66.5% % of Total 26.7% 31.1% 8.8% 66.5% Total Count Riwayat_konjungtivitis 38.2% 45.8% 15.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 38.2% 45.8% 15.9% 100.0%

13 sumber_informasi * Crosstabulation baik sedang kurang Total sumber_informa si keluarga Count sumber_informasi 44.2% 45.0% 10.8% 100.0% 55.2% 47.0% 32.5% 47.8% % of Total 21.1% 21.5% 5.2% 47.8% media cetak Count sumber_informasi 33.3% 66.7%.0% 100.0% 4.2% 7.0%.0% 4.8% % of Total 1.6% 3.2%.0% 4.8% media elektronik Count sumber_informasi 35.7% 35.7% 28.6% 100.0% 5.2% 4.3% 10.0% 5.6% % of Total 2.0% 2.0% 1.6% 5.6% penyuluhan/so Count

14 sialisasi sumber_informasi.0%.0% 100.0% 100.0%.0%.0% 5.0%.8% % of Total.0%.0%.8%.8% tidak dapat Count sumber_informasi 33.0% 46.6% 20.4% 100.0% 35.4% 41.7% 52.5% 41.0% % of Total 13.5% 19.1% 8.4% 41.0% Total Count sumber_informasi 38.2% 45.8% 15.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 38.2% 45.8% 15.9% 100.0%

dokumen-dokumen yang mirip

Lampiran 1. Angket Penelitian

Lampiran 1. Angket Penelitian GAMBARAN PENGETAHUAN DAN SIKAP DENGAN POSISI TAWAR KONSUMEN TENTANG PENGGUNAAN KEMASAN STYROFOAM SEBAGAI WADAH MAKANAN DI AMALIUN FOODCOURT TAHUN 2015 No. Responden :. I.