KUESIONER PENELITIAN PENGARUH KOMPONEN KOMUNIKASI DALAM PELAKSANAAN PREVENTION MOTHER TO CHILD TRANSMISSION (PMTCT) OLEH BIDAN TERHADAP KUNJUNGAN KLIEN PADA PELAYANAN VOLUNTARY COUNCELLING AND TEST (VCT) HIV-AIDS DI KOTA MEDAN Petunjuk pengisian angket Berilah tanda silang (X) pada salah satu kolom yang menurut Saudara benar terhadap kredibilitas seorang komunikator I. IDENTITAS TENAGA KESEHATAN 1. No Responden : 2. Umur : 3. Pendidikan : 4. Lama Bekerja sebagai Tenaga Kesehatan : Petunjuk pengisian angket Berilah tanda silang (X) pada salah satu kolom yang menurut Saudara benar terhadap kredibilitas seorang komunikator Keterangan : Apabila Responden menjawab : a. SB = Sangat Baik b. B = Baik c. CB = Cukup Baik d. KB = Kurang Baik e. TB = Tidak Baik
II. KOMUNIKATOR No Pernyataan 1. Kemampuan Berkomunikasi 2. Menguasai materi 3. Mendapatkan pelatihan dan ketrampilan 4. Menjalankan tugas sesuai kode etik 5. Menjalankan ketrampilan sesuai dengan kompetensi 6. Mempunyai disiplin 7. Mempunyai motivasi 8. Bersikap empati dan simpati terhadap klien Alternatif Jawaban 1 2 3 4 5 TB KB CB B SB Keterangan : Apabila Responden menjawab : a. SL = Selalu b. SR = Sering c. JR = Jarang d. KK = Kadang Kadang e. TP = Tidak Pernah III. PESAN No Pernyataan 1. Pengertian HIV/AIDS 2. Pencegahan HIV/AIDS 3. Penularan HIV/AIDS Alternatif Jawaban 1 2 3 4 5 TP KK JR SR SL 4. Peranan dan dukungan keluarga
IV. MEDIA No 1. Poster 2. leaflet 3. Lembar Balik 4. VCD 5. FILM Pernyataan Alternatif Jawaban 5 4 3 2 1 SL SR JR KK TP V. KOMUNIKAN 1. Sebagai bidan (komunikator) dalam memberikan informasi tentang HIV/ AIDS apakah klien (komunikan) menerima keberadaan saudara sebagai komunikator. a. Menerima b. Tidak menerima 2. Sebagai bidan, apakah dalam memberikan pesan pesan tentang HIV/AIDS, klien (komunikan) mengerti dan mau menerima pesan-pesan yang diberikan sehingga klien datang ke klinik VCT a. Menerima b. Tidak menerima VI. JUMLAH KUNJUNGAN PASIEN KE KLINIK VCT 1. Berapa jumlah klien yang telah anda layani dan dirujuk keklinik VCT setelah anda mengikuti pelatihan / sosialisasi tentang PMTCT dan VCT? Terima kasih. Orang
HASIL MENGOLAH DATA PENELITIAN Descriptives Statistic Std. Error Jlh Kom Mean 28.58.362 95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 27.84 Mean Upper Bound 29.31 5% Trimmed Mean 28.53 Median 28.00 Variance 4.314 Std. Deviation 2.077 Minimum 25 Maximum 33 Range 8 Interquartile Range 3 Skewness.231.409 Kurtosis -.890.798
Descriptives Statistic Std. Error Jlh Psn Mean 12.55.169 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 12.20 Upper Bound 12.89 5% Trimmed Mean 12.55 Median 13.00 Variance.943 Std. Deviation.971 Minimum 11 Maximum 14 Range 3 Interquartile Range 1 Skewness -.245.409 Kurtosis -.849.798
Descriptives Statistic Std. Error Jlh MED Mean 14.15.286 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 13.57 Upper Bound 14.73 5% Trimmed Mean 14.11 Median 14.00 Variance 2.695 Std. Deviation 1.642 Minimum 11 Maximum 18 Range 7 Interquartile Range 2 Skewness.419.409 Kurtosis -.286.798
Descriptives Statistic Std. Error JlhPK Mean 1.85.063 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 1.72 Upper Bound 1.98 5% Trimmed Mean 1.89 Median 2.00 Variance.133 Std. Deviation.364 Minimum 1 Maximum 2 Range 1 Interquartile Range 0 Skewness -2.038.409 Kurtosis 2.287.798
Descriptives Statistic Std. Error VCT Mean 19.45 1.079 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 15.67 Upper Bound 23.50 5% Trimmed Mean 3.83 Median 17.50 Variance 38.443 Std. Deviation 6.200 Minimum 5 Maximum 30 Range 25 Interquartile Range 12.5 Skewness -.660.409 Kurtosis -.128.798
KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN KAT.UMUR Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 35-41 th 08 26,4 26,4 26,4 42-48 th 17 51,5 57,5 57,5 49-55 th 06 16,1 16,1 100 > 56 th 2 6 6 Total 33 100 100 Pendidikan Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent D1 2 6.1 6.1 6.1 D3 29 87.9 87.9 93.9 D4 2 6.1 6.1 100.0 Total 33 100.0 100.0 LAMA BEKERJA Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 0 10 TAHUN 8 20,5 20,5 20,5 11 21 TAHUN 24 61,6 61,6 100.0 22 37 TAHUN 7 17,9 17,9 Total 33 100.0 100.0
HASIL ANALISIS UNIVARIAT Frequency Table Kategori Komunikator Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid kurang 17 51.5 51.5 51.5 baik 16 48.5 48.5 100.0 Total 33 100.0 100.0 Kategori Pesan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid kurang 14 42.4 42.4 42.4 baik 19 57.6 57.6 100.0 Total 33 100.0 100.0 Kategori Media Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid kurang 20 60.6 60.6 60.6 baik 13 39.4 39.4 100.0 Total 33 100.0 100.0
Kategori Penerimaan Pesan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid kurang 5 15.2 15.2 15.2 baik 28 84.8 84.8 100.0 Total 33 100.0 100.0 Kategori Kunjungan VCT Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid kurang 9 27.3 27.3 27.3 baik 24 72.7 72.7 100.0 Total 33 100.0 100.0
Kat.Kom * Kat.VCT ANALISIS ANALISIS BIVARIAT Crosstab KURANG BAIK Total kat.kom Total kurang baik Count 8 9 17 Expected Count 4.6 12.4 17.0 % within kat.kom 47.1% 52.9% 100.0% Count 1 15 16 Expected Count 4.4 11.6 16.0 % within kat.kom 6.2% 93.8% 100.0% Count 9 24 33 Expected Count 9.0 24.0 33.0 % within kat.kom 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided) Pearson Chi-Square 6.920 a 1.009 Continuity Correction b 5.016 1.025 Likelihood Ratio 7.683 1.006 Fisher's Exact Test.017.011 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.711 1.010 N of Valid Cases b 33 a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,36.
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided) Pearson Chi-Square 6.920 a 1.009 Continuity Correction b 5.016 1.025 Likelihood Ratio 7.683 1.006 Fisher's Exact Test.017.011 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.711 1.010 N of Valid Cases b 33 a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,36. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient.416.009 N of Valid Cases 33 Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper Odds Ratio for kat.kom (kurang / baik) For cohort = TDK BERKUNJUNG For cohort = BERKUNJUNG 13.333 1.424 124.880 7.529 1.057 53.645.565.354.900 N of Valid Cases 33
Kat.Pesan * Kat VCT Crosstab KURANG BAIK Total kat.psn Total kurang baik Count 6 8 14 Expected Count 3.8 10.2 14.0 % within kat.psn 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% Count 3 16 19 Expected Count 5.2 13.8 19.0 % within kat.psn 15.8% 84.2% 100.0% Count 9 24 33 Expected Count 9.0 24.0 33.0 % within kat.psn 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. Value df sided) sided) (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2.977 a 1.084 Continuity Correction b 1.769 1.183 Likelihood Ratio 2.977 1.084 Fisher's Exact Test.122.092 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.887 1.089 N of Valid Cases b 33 a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,82. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient.288.084 N of Valid Cases 33 Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper Odds Ratio for kat.psn (kurang / baik) For cohort = TDK BERKUNJUNG For cohort = BERKUNJUNG 4.000.788 20.316 2.714.816 9.027.679.414 1.112 N of Valid Cases 33 Kat.Med * Kat.VCT Crosstab kat.med Total kurang baik KURANG BAIK Total Count 6 14 20 Expected Count 5.5 14.5 20.0 % within kat.med 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% Count 3 10 13 Expected Count 3.5 9.5 13.0 % within kat.med 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% Count 9 24 33 Expected Count 9.0 24.0 33.0 % within kat.med 27.3% 72.7% 100.0%
Crosstab kat.med kurang baik KURANG BAIK Total Count 6 14 20 Expected Count 5.5 14.5 20.0 % within kat.med 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% Count 3 10 13 Expected Count 3.5 9.5 13.0 % within kat.med 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% Count 9 24 33 Expected Count 9.0 24.0 33.0 Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. Value df sided) sided) (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square.190 a 1.663 Continuity Correction b.001 1.971 Likelihood Ratio.193 1.660 Fisher's Exact Test 1.000.491 Linear-by-Linear Association.185 1.667 N of Valid Cases b 33 a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,55. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient.076.663 N of Valid Cases 33
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper Odds Ratio for kat.med (kurang / baik) For cohort = TDK BERKUNJUNG For cohort = BERKUNJUNG 1.429.287 7.118 1.300.393 4.304.910.602 1.376 N of Valid Cases 33 Kat.PK * Kat VCT Crosstab kat.pk Total kurang baik KURANG BAIK Total Count 0 5 5 Expected Count 1.4 3.6 5.0 % within kat.pk.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count 9 19 28 Expected Count 7.6 20.4 28.0 % within kat.pk 32.1% 67.9% 100.0% Count 9 24 33 Expected Count 9.0 24.0 33.0 % within kat.pk 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.210 a 1.137 Continuity Correction b.886 1.346 Likelihood Ratio 3.508 1.061 Fisher's Exact Test.290.179 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.143 1.143 N of Valid Cases b 33 a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,36. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient.251.137 N of Valid Cases 33 Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper For cohort = BERKUNJUNG 1.474 1.142 1.902 N of Valid Cases 33
HASIL ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT Logistic Regression Case Processing Summary Unweighted Cases a N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 33 100.0 Missing Cases 0.0 Total 33 100.0 Unselected Cases 0.0 Total 33 100.0 a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Internal Value TDK BERKUNJUNG 0
Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Internal Value TDK BERKUNJUNG 0 BERKUNJUNG 1 Block 1: Method = Enter Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Chi-square df Sig. Step 1 Step 10.368 4.035 Block 10.368 4.035 Model 10.368 4.035 Model Summary Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square 1 28.305 a.270.391 a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found. Classification Table a Predicted Percentage Observed KURANG BAIK Correct Step 1 KURANG 5 4 55.6 BAIK 5 19 79.2
Overall Percentage 72.7 a. The cut value is,500 Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 1 a kat.kom 2.197 1.196 3.374 1.066 8.994 kat.psn.957 1.119.731 1.392 2.603 kat.med -.577 1.150.251 1.616.562 kat.pk -19.431 1.722E4.000 1.999.000 Constant 36.110 3.444E4.000 1.999 4.814E15 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kat.kom, kat.psn, kat.med, kat.pk. Block 0: Beginning Block Classification Table a,b Predicted Percentage Observed KURANG BAIK Correct Step 0 KURANG 0 9.0 BAIK 0 24 100.0 Overall Percentage 72.7 a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is,500
Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant.981.391 6.297 1.012 2.667 Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig. Step 0 Variables kat.kom 6.920 1.009 kat.psn 2.977 1.044 kat.med.190 1.663 kat.pk 2.210 1.137 Overall Statistics 8.411 4.078 Case Processing Summary Unweighted Cases a N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 33 100.0 Missing Cases 0.0 Total 33 100.0 Unselected Cases 0.0 Total 33 100.0 a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value Internal Value kurang 0 baik 1 Block 1: Method = Enter Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Chi-square df Sig. Step 1 Step 8.585 2.014 Block 8.585 2.014 Model 8.585 2.014 Model Summary Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square 1 30.088 a.229.332 a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than,001. Classification Table a Predicted Observed kurang baik Percentage Correct Step 1 kurang 5 4 55.6 baik 5 19 79.2 Overall Percentage 72.7 a. The cut value is,500 Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 1 a kat.kom 2.357 1.165 4.091 1.043 10.561 kat.psn.865.917.889 1.346 2.374 Constant -3.452 1.806 3.654 1.056.032 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kat.kom, kat.psn. Block 0: Beginning Block Classification Table a,b Predicted Observed kurang baik Percentage Correct Step 0 kurang 0 9.0 baik 0 24 100.0 Overall Percentage 72.7 a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is,500 Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant.981.391 6.297 1.012 2.667 Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig. Step 0 Variables kat.kom 6.920 1.009 kat.psn 2.977 1.084 Overall Statistics 7.693 2.021