Lampiran 1. KUESIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN SOSIAL EKONOMI, INTAKE ZAT GIZI DENGAN TINGGI BADAN ANAK BARU MASUK SEKOLAH (TBABS) PADA DAERAH ENDEMIS GAKI DI KECAMATAN PARBULUAN KABUPATEN DAIRI TAHUN 2008 LOKASI PENELITIAN 1. Nama Propinsi : 2. Nama Kabupaten : 3. Nama Kecamatan : 4. Nama Desa/ kelurahan : 5. Nama SD : 6. Nomor SD : 7. Status SD : 1. Negeri 2.Swasta 3. Lain-lain 8. Tanggal Pengukuran :... 01. SOSIAL EKONOMI 1. Umur Ibu : 2. Pendidikan Ibu : a. Tamat SD b. Tamat SLTP c. Tamat SLTA d. Tamat D-3/S-1 3. Pekerjaan Ibu : a. PNS/POLRI b. Pegawai Swasta/Wiraswasta c. Petani/Buruh d. Ibu Rumah Tangga/ Tidak Bekerja 4. Umur Ayah : Tahun 5. Pendidikan Ayah : a. Tamat SD b. Tamat SLTP c. Tamat SLTA d. Tamat D-3/S-1 6. Pekerjaan Ayah : a. PNS/POLRI b. Pegawai Swasta/Wiraswasta c. Petani/Buruh d. Tidak Bekerja 7. Pendapatan Keluarga : Rp
INTAKE ENERGI DAN PROTEIN FORMULIR INTAKE ZAT GIZI FORMULIR FOOD RECALL 24 JAM No. Identitas :... Nama Responden :... Alamat :... Dusun :...Desa :... Kecamatan :...Sekolah :... Jam Makan Pagi Nama Masakan Nama Bahan Makanan URT Gram Jajanan Siang Jajanan Malam
INTAKE IODIUM No Nama Bahan 1 Ikan air tawar (segar/kering) 2 Ikan laut 3 Minyak ikan 4 Daging 5 Susu 6 Telur 7 Padi-padian 8 Buah-buahan 9 Kacangkacangan 10 Sayuran Tidak pernah < 1kl/ bulan Frequensi Penggunaan 1-3 1 kl/ 3-5 kl/ kl/bln minggu minggu 1 kl/ hari 2 kl/hari Cara Pengolahan
Lampiran 2 HASIL UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS VARIABEL INTAKE ZAT GIZI Reliability ****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ****** R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A) Mean Std Dev Cases 1. GOIS1 4.4000.5026 20.0 2. GOIS2 4.2500.4443 20.0 3. GOIS3 4.6500.4894 20.0 4. GOIS4 4.6500.4894 20.0 5. GOIS5 4.5000.5130 20.0 6. GOIS6 4.6000.5026 20.0 7. GOIS7 4.6000.5026 20.0 8. GOIS8 4.6000.5026 20.0 9. GOIS21 4.5000.5130 20.0 10. GOIS22 4.5000.5130 20.0 11. GTIORA4 4.5500.5104 20.0 12. GTIORA5 4.7500.4443 20.0 N of Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables SCALE 54.5500 19.4184 4.4066 12 Item-total Statistics Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted GOIS1 50.1500 16.4500.6661.9207 GOIS2 50.3000 17.2737.73.9257 GOIS3 49.9000 15.9895.8150.9146 GOIS4 49.9000 15.9895.8267.9146 GOIS5 50.0500 16.4711.6446.9216 GOIS6 49.9500 16.3658.6885.9198 GOIS7 49.9500 16.3658.6885.9198 GOIS8 49.9500 16.0500.7737.91 GOIS21 50.0500 16.4711.6446.9216 GOIS22 50.0500 16.4711.6446.9216 GTIORA4 50.0000 16.4211.6616.9209 GTIORA5 49.8000 16.8000.6648.9208 IODIUM1 22.1500 4.7658.5852.9152 IODIUM2 22.2500 4.1974.8764.8730 IODIUM4 22.3000 4.3263.8081.8835 IODIUM5 22.3500 4.3447.8138.8828 IODIUM6 22.4000 4.4632.7738.8889 IODIUM9 22.3000 4.6421.6365.9084 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 20.0 N of Items = 12 Alpha =.926
Lampiran 3 HASIL PENGOLAHAN DATA Tidak Frequency Table 31 50.0 50.0 50.0 31 50.0 50.0 100.0 PNS Buruh/Tani Wiraswasta Ibu Rumah Tangga Pekerjaan Ibu 4 6.5 6.5 6.5 15 24.2 24.2 30.6 14 22.6 22.6 53.2 29 46.8 46.8 100.0 Pekerjaan Ibu Tidak Bekerja Bekerja 29 46.8 46.8 46.8 33 53.2 53.2 100.0 Pekerjaan Ayah PNS Buruh/Tani Wiraswasta Tidak Bekerja Tetap 10 16.1 16.1 16.1 25 40.3 40.3 56.5 9 14.5 14.5 71.0 18 29.0 29.0 100.0
Tidak Bekerja Bekerja Pekerjaan Ayah 20 32.3 32.3 32.3 42 67.7 67.7 100.0 Pendidikan Ayah Tinggi Rendah 36 58.1 58.1 58.1 26 41.9 41.9 100.0 Tinggi Rendah Pendidikan Ibu 28 45.2 45.2 45.2 34 54.8 54.8 100.0 Pendapatan Responden < Rp. 761.000/bulan >= Rp. 761.000/bulan 42 67.7 67.7 67.7 20 32.3 32.3 100.0 Konsumsi Bayam 9 14.5 14.5 14.5 30 48.4 48.4.9 23 37.1 37.1 100.0
>=2x/hr Konsumsi Bunga Kol 3 4.8 4.8 4.8 17 27.4 27.4 32.3 29 46.8 46.8 79.0 8 12.9 12.9 91.9 5 8.1 8.1 100.0 >=2x/hr Konsumsi Sawi Hijau 2 3.2 3.2 3.2 23 37.1 37.1 40.3 30 48.4 48.4 88.7 4 6.5 6.5 95.2 3 4.8 4.8 100.0 Konsumsi Cabe Hijau 6 9.7 9.7 9.7 18 29.0 29.0 38.7 38 61.3 61.3 100.0 Konsumsi daun kacang panjang 7 11.3 11.3 11.3 45 72.6 72.6 83.9 10 16.1 16.1 100.0
Konsumsi Jengkol 18 29.0 29.0 29.0 35 56.5 56.5 85.5 9 14.5 14.5 100.0 Konsumsi Petai Missing System Frequency Percent 100.0 >=2x/hr Konsumsi Daun Singkong 2 3.2 3.2 3.2 6 9.7 9.7 12.9 28 45.2 45.2 58.1 24 38.7 38.7 96.8 2 3.2 3.2 100.0 <1 x/bln >=2x/hr Konsumsi Kubis 2 3.2 3.2 3.2 9 14.5 14.5 17.7 21 33.9 33.9 51.6 21 33.9 33.9 85.5 8 12.9 12.9 98.4 1 1.6 1.6 100.0
>=2x/hr Konsumsi Singkong 4 6.5 6.5 6.5 17 27.4 27.4 33.9 29 46.8 46.8 80.6 11 17.7 17.7 98.4 1 1.6 1.6 100.0 Konsumsi Bawang Putih 20 32.3 32.3 32.3 27 43.5 43.5 75.8 15 24.2 24.2 100.0 Konsumsi Bawang Merah 1 1.6 1.6 1.6 3 4.8 4.8 6.5 25 40.3 40.3 46.8 33 53.2 53.2 100.0 <1 x/bln Konsumsi Ikan Tawar 9 14.5 14.5 14.5 25 40.3 40.3 54.8 9 14.5 14.5 69.4 8 12.9 12.9 82.3 11 17.7 17.7 100.0
Konsumsi Ikan Laut 1 1.6 1.6 1.6 20 32.3 32.3 33.9 29 46.8 46.8 80.6 12 19.4 19.4 100.0 <1 x/bln Konsumsi Daging 3 4.8 4.8 4.8 39.9.9 67.7 13 21.0 21.0 88.7 4 6.5 6.5 95.2 3 4.8 4.8 100.0 <1 x/bln Konsumsi Susu 3 4.8 4.8 4.8 35 56.5 56.5 61.3 6 9.7 9.7 71.0 9 14.5 14.5 85.5 9 14.5 14.5 100.0 Konsumsi Telur 9 14.5 14.5 14.5 36 58.1 58.1 72.6 8 12.9 12.9 85.5 9 14.5 14.5 100.0
<1 x/bln >=2x/hr Konsumsi Kacang-Kacangan 6 9.7 9.7 9.7 16 25.8 25.8 35.5 8 12.9 12.9 48.4 14 22.6 22.6 71.0 17 27.4 27.4 98.4 1 1.6 1.6 100.0 intake gizi (protein) Baik (=45 gram) Kurang (<45 gram 24 38.7 38.7 38.7 38 61.3 61.3 100.0 Baik (>=1.900 kkal) Kurang (<1.900 kkal) intake gzi (energy) 18 29.0 29.0 29.0 44 71.0 71.0 100.0 Intake yodium 100-120 ugram <100 ugram 22 35.5 35.5 35.5 40 64.5 64.5 100.0 Crosstabs intake gizi (protein) *
Crosstab intake gizi (protein) Baik (=45 gram) Kurang (<45 gram % of % of % of Tidak 17 7 24 27.4% 11.3% 38.7% 14 24 38 22.6% 38.7% 61.3% 31 31 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 6.798 b 1.009 Continuity Correction a 5.507 1.019 Likelihood Ratio 6.959 1.008 Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association 6.689 1.010 N of Cases a. Computed only for a 2x2 table (2-sided) (1-sided).018.009 b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.00. Risk Estimate Odds Ratio for intake gizi (protein) (Baik (=45 gram) / Kurang (<45 gram) Tidak N of Cases 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper 4.163 1.386 12.503 1.923 1.179 3.135.4.237.902
intake gzi (energy) * Crosstab intake gzi (energy) Baik (>=1.900 kkal) Kurang (<1.900 kkal) % of % of % of Tidak 14 4 18 22.6% 6.5% 29.0% 17 27 44 27.4% 43.5% 71.0% 31 31 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 7.828 b 1.005 Continuity Correction a 6.341 1.012 Likelihood Ratio 8.177 1.004 Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association 7.702 1.006 N of Cases a. Computed only for a 2x2 table (2-sided) (1-sided).011.005 b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.00. Risk Estimate Odds Ratio for intake gzi (energy) (Baik (>=1.900 kkal) / Kurang (<1.900 kkal)) Tidak N of Cases 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper 5.559 1.567 19.717 2.013 1.288 3.147.3.148.887
Intake yodium * Crosstab Intake yodium 100-120 ugram <100 ugram % of % of % of Tidak 16 6 22 25.8% 9.7% 35.5% 15 25 40 24.2% 40.3% 64.5% 31 31 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction a Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) 7.045 b 1.008 5.707 1.017 7.243 1.007 6.932 1.008 (2-sided).016.008 N of Cases a. Computed only for a 2x2 table b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.00. (1-sided) Risk Estimate Odds Ratio for Intake yodium (100-120 ugram / <100 ugram) Tidak N of Cases 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper 4.444 1.427 13.839 1.939 1.206 3.118.436.212.899
Pekerjaan Ibu * Crosstab Pekerjaan Ibu Tidak Bekerja Bekerja % of % of % of Tidak 17 12 29 27.4% 19.4% 46.8% 14 19 33 22.6% 30.6% 53.2% 31 31 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5.429 b 1.020 Continuity Correction a 4.290 1.038 Likelihood Ratio 5.525 1.019 Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association 5.342 1.021 N of Cases a. Computed only for a 2x2 table (2-sided) (1-sided).037.019 b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.50. Risk Estimate Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan Ibu (Tidak Bekerja / Bekerja) Tidak N of Cases 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper 1.923.699 5.285 1.382.837 2.282.719.426 1.212
Pekerjaan Ayah * Crosstab Pekerjaan Ayah Tidak Bekerja Bekerja % of % of % of Tidak 15 5 20 24.2% 8.1% 32.3% 16 26 42 25.8% 41.9% 67.7% 31 31 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 7.381 b 1.007 Continuity Correction a 5.979 1.014 Likelihood Ratio 7.636 1.006 Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association 7.2 1.007 N of Cases a. Computed only for a 2x2 table (2-sided) (1-sided).013.007 b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.00. Risk Estimate Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan Ayah (Tidak Bekerja / Bekerja) Tidak N of Cases 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper 4.875 1.485 15.998 1.969 1.241 3.122.404.182.895
Pendidikan Ayah * Crosstab Pendidikan Ayah Tinggi Rendah % of % of % of Tidak 16 20 36 25.8% 32.3% 58.1% 15 11 26 24.2% 17.7% 41.9% 31 31 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.060 b 1.303 Continuity Correction a.596 1.440 Likelihood Ratio 1.063 1.302 Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association 1.043 1.307 N of Cases a. Computed only for a 2x2 table (2-sided) (1-sided).440.220 b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.00. Risk Estimate Odds Ratio for Pendidikan Ayah (Tinggi / Rendah) Tidak N of Cases 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper.587.212 1.5.770.471 1.260 1.313.769 2.243
Pendidikan Ibu * Crosstab Pendidikan Ibu Tinggi Rendah % of % of % of Tidak 19 9 28 30.6% 14.5% 45.2% 12 22 34 19.4% 35.5% 54.8% 31 31 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 6.513 b 1.011 Continuity Correction a 5.275 1.022 Likelihood Ratio 6.637 1.010 Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association 6.408 1.011 N of Cases a. Computed only for a 2x2 table (2-sided) (1-sided).021.010 b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.00. Risk Estimate Odds Ratio for Pendidikan Ibu (Tinggi / Rendah) Tidak N of Cases 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper 3.870 1.341 11.172 1.923 1.141 3.239.497.275.899
Pendapatan Responden * Crosstab Pendapatan Responden < Rp. 761.000/bulan >= Rp. 761.000/bulan % of % of % of Tidak 19 23 42 30.6% 37.1% 67.7% 12 8 20 19.4% 12.9% 32.3% 31 31 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.181 b 1.277 Continuity Correction a.664 1.415 Likelihood Ratio 1.187 1.276 Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association 1.1 1.281 N of Cases a. Computed only for a 2x2 table (2-sided) (1-sided).416.208 b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.00. Risk Estimate Odds Ratio for Pendapatan Responden (< Rp. 761.000/bulan / >= Rp. 761.000/bulan) Tidak N of Cases 95% Confidence Interval Value Lower Upper.551.187 1.4.754.463 1.229 1.369.749 2.502
Logistic Regression Unweighted Cases a Selected Cases Unselected Cases Case Processing Summary Included in Analysis Missing Cases N Percent 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Tidak Internal Value 0 Block 0: Beginning Block 1 Classification Table a,b Predicted Step 0 Observed Overall Percentage a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is.500 Tidak Percentage Tidak Correct 0 31.0 0 31 100.0 50.0 Variables in the Equation Step 0 Constant B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B).000.254.000 1 1.000 1.000 Variables not in the Equation Step 0 Variables Overall Statistics KRJA_IBU DIDK.AYH DIDK.IBU PROTEIN ENERGI YODIUM Score df Sig. 1.0 1.203.051 1.820 6.665 1.010 6.798 1.009 7.828 1.005 7.045 1.008 18.459 6.005
Step 1 a KRJA_IBU KERJ.AYH DDIK.IBU PROTEIN IODIUM ENERGY Constant Variables in the Equation 95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper.527.674.612 1.434 1.694.452 6.349 1.704.760 5.031 1.025 5.494 1.240 24.348.677.719.886 1.347 1.969.481 8.064 1.574.742 4.498 1.034 4.825 1.127 20.663 2.491 1.026 5.894 1.015 12.069 1.616 90.144.485.793.375 1.541 1.4.344 7.681-5.122 1.420 13.014 1.000.006 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: KRJA_IBU, KERJ.AYH, DDIK.IBU, PROTEIN, IODIUM, ENERGY. Block 1: Method = Forward Stepwise (Conditional) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Step 1 Step 2 Step Block Model Step Block Model Chi-square df Sig. 8.177 1.004 8.177 1.004 8.177 1.004 7.979 1.005 16.155 2.000 16.155 2.000 Model Summary Step 1 2-2 Log Cox & Snell Nagelkerke likelihood R Square R Square 77.774.124.165 69.795.229.306 Classification Table a Predicted Observed Step 1 Overall Percentage Step 2 Overall Percentage a. The cut value is.500 Tidak Tidak Percentage Tidak Correct 14 17 45.2 4 27 87.1 66.1 25 6 80.6 10 21 67.7 74.2
Variables in the Equation Step IODIUM 1 a Constant Step PROTEIN 2 b IODIUM Constant 95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper 1.715.646 7.052 1.008 5.559 1.567 19.717-1.253.567 4.883 1.027.286 1.655.617 7.196 1.007 5.235 1.5 17.545 1.948.698 7.786 1.005 7.016 1.786 27.564-2.443.777 9.878 1.002.087 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: IODIUM. b. Variable(s) entered on step 2: PROTEIN. Model if Term Removed a Variable Step 1 Step 2 ENERGI PROTEIN ENERGI Change in Model Log -2 Log Sig. of the Likelihood Likelihood df Change -43.012 8.249 1.004-38.944 8.092 1.004-39.570 9.345 1.002 a. Based on conditional parameter estimates Variables not in the Equation Step 1 Step 2 Variables Overall Statistics Variables Overall Statistics KRJA_IBU DIDK.AYH DIDK.IBU PROTEIN YODIUM KRJA_IBU DIDK.AYH DIDK.IBU YODIUM Score df Sig. 1.064 1.302.235 1.8 4.743 1.029 7.743 1.005 1.953 1.1 12.405 5.030 1.059 1.303.474 1.491 2.092 1.148 1.272 1.259 4.976 4.290