KUESIONER PENELITIAN

KUESIONER PENELITIAN FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN KEJADIAN INFEKSI SALURAN PERNAFASAN ATAS (ISPA) PADA BALITA DI KELURAHAN ILIR GUNUNGSITOLI KABUPATEN NIAS TAHUN 2008 No. Pertanyaan Kode Nilai 1 2 3 4 I IDENTITAS RESPONDEN (IBU BALITA) 1. Nama Ibu 2. Umur Ibu... Tahun 3. Pendidikan 3. Tidak sekolah 4. SD 5. SMP 6. SMA 7. Akademi/Perguruan Tinggi 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 4. Pekerjaan 1. Pegawai Negeri Sipil 2. Wiraswasta 3. Karyawan 4. Petani/Nelayan 5. Ibu Rumah Tangga 5. Apakah pekerjaan suami ibu? 6. Berapa pendapatan keluarga ratarata per bulan? Rp. 7. Berapa jumlah tanggungan keluarga... orang II FAKTOR BALITA 1. Nama 2. Jenis kelamin Laki-laki/Perempuan 3. Umur... Bulan 4. Berat Badan... Kg 5. Berat Badan Lahir... Gram 6. Apakah anak ibu mendapat ASI sejak lahir sampai usia 6 bulan tanpa diberi makanan tambahan atau minuman selain ASI 7. Imunisasi apa yang telah didapatkan balita sejak lahir 1. ASI < 6 bulan ditambah makanan tambahan 2. ASI saja 1. Tidak ada 2. BCG... kali 3. DPT...kali 4. Polio...kali 5. Campak...kali 6. Hepatitis B...kali 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 106

III FAKTOR LINGKUNGAN RUMAH 1. Kelembaban Ruangan Dry =... o C; Wet =... o C Δ o C =... % kelembaban =...% 2. Suhu Ruangan... o C;... o C;... o C Rata-rata =... o C 3. Luas Ventilasi Rumah... m x... m =...m 2. 4. Jumlah anggota keluarga yang menetap di rumah... orang 5. Luas lantai rumah... m x... m =...m 2 6. Apakah keluarga ibu terbiasa menggunakan anti nyamuk? 1. Ya 2. Tidak 1. 2. 7. Jika Ya, Obat nyamuk jenis apa yang sering digunakan? 1. Bakar 2. Semprot 1. 2. 8. Ketika ibu menggunakan obat anti nyamuk dimana sering ditempatkan? 9. Jenis bahan bakar apa yang sering digunakan untuk memasak? 10. Apakah ada anggota keluarga yang biasa merokok? 11. Jika Ya, dimana sering dia merokok? IV 1. Apakah dalam dua minggu terakhir ini anak ibu mengalami tanda-tanda klinis seperti batuk dan atau pilek, disertai demam atau tidak? 3. Elektrik 1. Kamar tidur 2. Ruang keluarga 1. Kayu bakar 2. Minyak tanah 1. Ya 2. Tidak 1. Di dalam rumah 2. Di luar rumah STATUS PENYAKIT ISPA PADA BALITA 1. Ya 2. Tidak 3. 1. 2. 1. 2. Pewawancara ( ) 107

ANALISIS UNIVARIAT FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=ISPA umurbalk jnskel statusgizk beratlahrk asi Imunumurbuk pddkn pkrjn pdptnkelk klembabnk suhuk vent kpdtn antnymk bbm mrokok/ntiles= 4/STATISTICS=STDDEV/ORDER= ANALYSIS. Frequency Table Kejadian ISPA Tidak ISPA Frequency Percent Percent Percent 125 79.6 79.6 79.6 32 20.4 20.4 100.0 < 2 bulan 2-11 bulan 12-59 bulan Umur Frequency Percent Percent Percent 12 7.6 7.6 7.6 43 27.4 27.4 35.0 102 65.0 65.0 100.0 Laki-laki Wanita Jenis Kelamin Frequency Percent Percent Percent 82 52.2 52.2 52.2 75 47.8 47.8 100.0 Gizi lebih Gizi Baik Gizi Kurang Gizi Buruk Status Gizi Frequency Percent Percent Percent 5 3.2 3.2 3.2 88 56.1 56.1 59.2 40 25.5 25.5 84.7 24 15.3 15.3 100.0 Baik Tidak Baik Status Gizi Frequency Percent Percent Percent 93 59.2 59.2 59.2 64 40.8 40.8 100.0 >= 2.500 gr < 2.500 gr Berat Badan Bayi Lahir Frequency Percent Percent Percent 143 91.1 91.1 91.1 14 8.9 8.9 100.0 Status ASI Eksklusif ASI Eksklusif Tidak ASI Eksklusif Frequency Percent Percent Percent 37 23.6 23.6 23.6 120 76.4 76.4 100.0 108

Lengkap Tidak Lengkap Status Imunisasi Frequency Percent Percent Percent 95 60.5 60.5 60.5 62 39.5 39.5 100.0 <30 tahun >=30 tahun Umur Ibu Frequency Percent Percent Percent 100 63.7 63.7 63.7 57 36.3 36.3 100.0 Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu Belum sekolah/tamat SD SMP SMA Akademi/PT Frequency Percent Percent Percent 71 45.2 45.2 45.2 32 20.4 20.4 65.6 42 26.8 26.8 92.4 12 7.6 7.6 100.0 Tingkat pendidikan Ibu Rendah Tinggi Frequency Percent Percent Percent 103 65.6 65.6 65.6 54 34.4 34.4 100.0 PNS Wiraswasta Karyawan IRT Petani/Pelayan Pekerjaan Ibu Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 1.9 1.9 1.9 10 6.4 6.4 8.3 5 3.2 3.2 11.5 136 86.6 86.6 98.1 3 1.9 1.9 100.0 Bekerja Tidak bekerja Status pekerjaan Ibu Frequency Percent Percent Percent 21 13.4 13.4 13.4 136 86.6 86.6 100.0 >= Rp 820.000 < Rp 820.000 Pendapatan Keluarga Frequency Percent Percent Percent 90 57.3 57.3 57.3 67 42.7 42.7 100.0 109

Baik Tidak Baik Kelembaban Ruangan Frequency Percent Percent Percent 51 32.5 32.5 32.5 106 67.5 67.5 100.0 Baik Tidak Baik Suhu Ruangan Frequency Percent Percent Percent 104 66.2 66.2 66.2 53 33.8 33.8 100.0 Baik Tidak Baik Ventilasi Rumah Frequency Percent Percent Percent 62 39.5 39.5 39.5 95 60.5 60.5 100.0 Padat Tidak Padat Kepadatan Hunian Rumah Frequency Percent Percent Percent 54 34.4 34.4 34.4 103 65.6 65.6 100.0 Ya Tidak Pemakaian Anti Nyamuk Frequency Percent Percent Percent 32 20.4 20.4 20.4 125 79.6 79.6 100.0 Kayu Bakar Minyak Tanah Bahan Bakar Untuk Masak Frequency Percent Percent Percent 24 15.3 15.3 15.3 133 84.7 84.7 100.0 Ada Tidak Ada Keberadaan Perokok Frequency Percent Percent Percent 112 71.3 71.3 71.3 45 28.7 28.7 100.0 110

ANALISIS BIVARIAT CROSSTABS/TABLES=umurbalk jnskel statusgiz statusgizk beratlahrk asi Imun umurbuk pddkn pkrjn pdptnkelk klembabnk suhuk vent kpdtn antnymk bbm mrokok BY ISPA/FORMAT= AVALUE TABLES/STATISTIC=CHISQ RISK/CELLS= COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL/COUNT ROUND CELL/BARCHART /METHOD=MC CIN(95) SAMPLES(10000). Crosstabs 1. Hubungan Umur Dengan Kejadia ISPA pada Crosstab Umur < 2 bulan 2-11 bulan 12-59 bulan % within Umur % within Umur % within Umur % within Umur ISPA Tidak ISPA 9 3 12 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% 7.2% 9.4% 7.6% 30 13 43 69.8% 30.2% 100.0% 24.0% 40.6% 27.4% 86 16 102 84.3% 15.7% 100.0% 68.8% 50.0% 65.0% Chi-Square Tests N of Cases a. Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided) 4.115 a 2.128 3.953 2.139 2.802 1.094 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.45. 111

2. Hubungan Jenis Kelamin Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki Wanita % within Jenis Kelamin % within Jenis Kelamin % within Jenis Kelamin ISPA Tidak ISPA 61 21 82 74.4% 25.6% 100.0% 48.8% 65.6% 52.2% 38.9% 13.4% 52.2% 64 11 75 85.3% 14.7% 100.0% 51.2% 34.4% 47.8% 40.8% 7.0% 47.8% Continuity Correction a Chi-Square Tests d Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided) 2.891 b 1.089.113.066 2.256 1.133 2.938 1.087.113.066.113.066 2.872 c 1.090.113.066.038 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.29. c. The standardized statistic is -1.695. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. Point Probability 112

3. Hubungan Status Gizi Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Status Gizi Baik Tidak Baik % within Status Gizi ISPA Pada % within Status Gizi ISPA Pada % within Status Gizi ISPA Pada ISPA Tidak ISPA 68 25 93 73.1% 26.9% 100.0% 54.4% 78.1% 59.2% 43.3% 15.9% 59.2% 57 7 64 89.1% 10.9% 100.0% 45.6% 21.9% 40.8% 36.3% 4.5% 40.8% Continuity Correction a Chi-Square Tests d Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided) 5.939 b 1.015.016.011 4.997 1.025 6.323 1.012.016.011.016.011 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.04. c. The standardized statistic is -2.429. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. Point Probability 5.901 c 1.015.016.011.008 113

4. Hubungan Berat Badan Bayi Lahir Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Berat Badan Bayi Lahir >= 2.500 gr < 2.500 gr % within Berat Badan Bayi Lahir % within Berat Badan Bayi Lahir % within Berat Badan Bayi Lahir ISPA Tidak ISPA 112 31 143 78.3% 21.7% 100.0% 89.6% 96.9% 91.1% 71.3% 19.7% 91.1% 13 1 14 92.9% 7.1% 100.0% 10.4% 3.1% 8.9% 8.3%.6% 8.9% Chi-Square Tests d Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Point Probability 1.660 b 1.198.304.175 Continuity Correction a.885 1.347 2.048 1.152.215.175.304.175 1.650 c 1.199.304.175.140 N of Cases b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.85. c. The standardized statistic is -1.284. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. 114

5. Hubungan Status ASI Eksklusif Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Status ASI Eksklusif ASI Eksklusif Tidak ASI Eksklusif % within Status ASI Eksklusif % within Status ASI Eksklusif % within Status ASI Eksklusif ISPA Tidak ISPA 24 13 37 64.9% 35.1% 100.0% 19.2% 40.6% 23.6% 15.3% 8.3% 23.6% 101 19 120 84.2% 15.8% 100.0% 80.8% 59.4% 76.4% 64.3% 12.1% 76.4% Continuity Correction a Chi-Square Tests d Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided) 6.493 b 1.011.018.013 5.358 1.021 5.948 1.015.018.013.018.013 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.54. c. The standardized statistic is -2.540. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. Point Probability 6.451 c 1.011.018.013.009 115

6. Hubungan Status Imunisasi Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Status Imunisasi Lengkap Tidak Lengkap % within Status Imunisasi ISPA Pada % within Status Imunisasi ISPA Pada % within Status Imunisasi ISPA Pada ISPA Tidak ISPA 69 26 95 72.6% 27.4% 100.0% 55.2% 81.3% 60.5% 43.9% 16.6% 60.5% 56 6 62 90.3% 9.7% 100.0% 44.8% 18.8% 39.5% 35.7% 3.8% 39.5% Chi-Square Tests d Continuity Correction a Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided) 7.235 b 1.007.008.005 6.186 1.013 7.843 1.005.008.005.008.005 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.64. c. The standardized statistic is -2.681. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. Point Probability 7.189 c 1.007.008.005.004 116

7. Hubungan Umur Ibu Dengan Kejadian Umur Ibu * Kejadian Crosstabulation Umur Ibu <30 tahun >=30 tahun % within Umur Ibu % within Umur Ibu % within Umur Ibu ISPA Tidak ISPA 80 20 100 80.0% 20.0% 100.0% 64.0% 62.5% 63.7% 51.0% 12.7% 63.7% 45 12 57 78.9% 21.1% 100.0% 36.0% 37.5% 36.3% 28.7% 7.6% 36.3% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided).025 b 1.875 Continuity Correction a.000 1 1.000.025 1.875.025 1.875 N of Cases Exact Sig. (2-sided) b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11. 62. Exact Sig. (1-sided) 1.000.515 117

8. Hubungan Tingkat Pendidikan Ibu Dengan Kejadian Tingkat pendidikan Ibu * Kejadian Crosstabulation Tingkat pendidikan Ibu Rendah Tinggi % within Tingkat pendidikan Ibu % within Tingkat pendidikan Ibu % within Tingkat pendidikan Ibu ISPA Tidak ISPA 86 17 103 83.5% 16.5% 100.0% 68.8% 53.1% 65.6% 54.8% 10.8% 65.6% 39 15 54 72.2% 27.8% 100.0% 31.2% 46.9% 34.4% 24.8% 9.6% 34.4% Continuity Correction a Chi-Square Tests d Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided) 2.774 b 1.096.143.074 2.123 1.145 2.688 1.101.143.074.101.074 Point Probability 2.757 c 1.097.143.074.042 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.01. c. The standardized statistic is 1.660. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. 118

9. Hubungan Status Pekerjaan Ibu Dengan Kejadian Status pekerjaan Ibu * Kejadian Crosstabulation Status pekerjaan Ibu Bekerja Tidak bekerja % within Status pekerjaan Ibu % within Status pekerjaan Ibu % within Status pekerjaan Ibu ISPA Tidak ISPA 18 3 21 85.7% 14.3% 100.0% 14.4% 9.4% 13.4% 11.5% 1.9% 13.4% 107 29 136 78.7% 21.3% 100.0% 85.6% 90.6% 86.6% 68.2% 18.5% 86.6% Chi-Square Tests Continuity Correction N of Cases a Asymp. Sig. Value df (2-sided).555 b 1.456.206 1.650.597 1.440.552 1.458 Exact Sig. (2-sided) b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4. 28. Exact Sig. (1-sided).571.338 119

10. Hubungan Pendapatan Keluarga Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Pendapatan Keluarga >= Rp 820.000 < Rp 820.000 % within Pendapatan Keluarga % within Pendapatan Keluarga % within Pendapatan Keluarga ISPA Tidak ISPA 66 24 90 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% 52.8% 75.0% 57.3% 42.0% 15.3% 57.3% 59 8 67 88.1% 11.9% 100.0% 47.2% 25.0% 42.7% 37.6% 5.1% 42.7% Continuity Correction a Chi-Square Tests d Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided) 5.133 b 1.023.028.018 4.265 1.039 5.383 1.020.028.018.028.018 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.66. c. The standardized statistic is -2.258. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. Point Probability 5.100 c 1.024.028.018.012 120

11. Hubungan Kelembaban Ruangan Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Kelembaban Ruangan Baik Tidak Baik % within Kelembaban Ruangan % within Kelembaban Ruangan % within Kelembaban Ruangan ISPA Tidak ISPA 34 17 51 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% 27.2% 53.1% 32.5% 21.7% 10.8% 32.5% 91 15 106 85.8% 14.2% 100.0% 72.8% 46.9% 67.5% 58.0% 9.6% 67.5% Chi-Square Tests d Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Point Probability 7.808 b 1.005.007.006 Continuity Correction a 6.670 1.010 7.420 1.006.010.006.010.006 7.758 c 1.005.007.006.004 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.39. c. The standardized statistic is -2.785. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. 121

12. Hubungan Suhu Ruangan Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Suhu Ruangan Baik Tidak Baik % within Suhu Ruangan ISPA Pada % within Suhu Ruangan ISPA Pada % within Suhu Ruangan ISPA Pada ISPA Tidak ISPA 79 25 104 76.0% 24.0% 100.0% 63.2% 78.1% 66.2% 50.3% 15.9% 66.2% 46 7 53 86.8% 13.2% 100.0% 36.8% 21.9% 33.8% 29.3% 4.5% 33.8% Chi-Square Tests d Continuity Correction a Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided) 2.538 b 1.111.143.081 1.914 1.166 2.686 1.101.143.081.143.081 Point Probability 2.522 c 1.112.143.081.048 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.80. c. The standardized statistic is -1.588. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. 122

13. Hubungan Ventilasi Rumah Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Ventilasi Rumah Baik Tidak Baik % within Ventilasi Rumah ISPA Pada % within Ventilasi Rumah ISPA Pada % within Ventilasi Rumah ISPA Pada ISPA Tidak ISPA 37 25 62 59.7% 40.3% 100.0% 29.6% 78.1% 39.5% 23.6% 15.9% 39.5% 88 7 95 92.6% 7.4% 100.0% 70.4% 21.9% 60.5% 56.1% 4.5% 60.5% Chi-Square Tests d Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Point Probability 25.106 b 1.000.000.000 Continuity Correction a 23.116 1.000 25.180 1.000.000.000.000.000 24.946 c 1.000.000.000.000 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.64. c. The standardized statistic is -4.995. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. 123

14. Hubungan Kepadatan Hunian Rumah Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Kepadatan Hunian Rumah Padat Tidak Padat % within Kepadatan Hunian Rumah % within Kepadatan Hunian Rumah % within Kepadatan Hunian Rumah ISPA Tidak ISPA 48 6 54 88.9% 11.1% 100.0% 38.4% 18.8% 34.4% 30.6% 3.8% 34.4% 77 26 103 74.8% 25.2% 100.0% 61.6% 81.3% 65.6% 49.0% 16.6% 65.6% Chi-Square Tests d Continuity Correction a Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided) 4.360 b 1.037.039.027 3.532 1.060 4.715 1.030.039.027.039.027 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.01. c. The standardized statistic is 2.081. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. Point Probability 4.332 c 1.037.039.027.018 124

15. Hubungan Pemakaian obat Anti Nyamuk Dengan Kejadian ISPA Pada Crosstab Pemakaian Anti Nyamuk Ya Tidak % within Pemakaian Anti Nyamuk % within Pemakaian Anti Nyamuk % within Pemakaian Anti Nyamuk ISPA Tidak ISPA 27 5 32 84.4% 15.6% 100.0% 21.6% 15.6% 20.4% 17.2% 3.2% 20.4% 98 27 125 78.4% 21.6% 100.0% 78.4% 84.4% 79.6% 62.4% 17.2% 79.6% Chi-Square Tests d Continuity Correction a Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided).560 b 1.454.481.316.253 1.615.589 1.443.481.316.624.316 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.52. c. The standardized statistic is.746. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. Point Probability.557 c 1.455.481.316.156 125

16. Hubungan Bahan Bakar Untuk Masak Dengan Crosstab Bahan Bakar Untuk Masak Kayu Bakar Minyak Tanah % within Bahan Bakar Untuk Masak % within Bahan Bakar Untuk Masak % within Bahan Bakar Untuk Masak ISPA Tidak ISPA 20 4 24 83.3% 16.7% 100.0% 16.0% 12.5% 15.3% 12.7% 2.5% 15.3% 105 28 133 78.9% 21.1% 100.0% 84.0% 87.5% 84.7% 66.9% 17.8% 84.7% Continuity Correction a Chi-Square Tests d Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided).241 b 1.623.786.430.047 1.829.251 1.616.786.430.786.430.239 c 1.625.786.430.202 N of Cases b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.89. c. The standardized statistic is.489. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. Point Probability 126

17. Hubungan Keberadaan Perokok Dengan Kejadian Crosstab Keberadaan Perokok Ada Tidak Ada % within Keberadaan Perokok % within Keberadaan Perokok % within Keberadaan Perokok ISPA Tidak ISPA 87 25 112 77.7% 22.3% 100.0% 69.6% 78.1% 71.3% 55.4% 15.9% 71.3% 38 7 45 84.4% 15.6% 100.0% 30.4% 21.9% 28.7% 24.2% 4.5% 28.7% Chi-Square Tests d Continuity Correction a Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided).906 b 1.341.389.235.537 1.464.943 1.331.389.235.389.235 N of Cases b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.17. c. The standardized statistic is -.949. d. For 2x2 crosstabulation, exact results are provided instead of Monte Carlo results. Point Probability.900 c 1.343.389.235.116 127

ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT Logistic Regression Case Processing Summary Selected Cases Included in Analysis Unweighted Cases a Unselected Cases Missing Cases a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. N Percent 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Tidak ISPA ISPA Internal Value 0 1 Block 0: Beginning Block Classification Table a,b Observed 0 Kejadian ISPA Pada Overall Percentage Tidak ISPA ISPA a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is.500 Predicted Percentage Tidak ISPA ISPA Correct 0 32.0 0 125 100.0 79.6 Variables in the Equation 0 Constant B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 1.363.198 47.302 1.000 3.906 Variables not in the Equation 0 Variables Overall Statistics statusgizk asi Imun pdptnkelk klembabnk vent kpdtn Score df Sig. 5.939 1.015 6.493 1.011 7.235 1.007 5.133 1.023 7.808 1.005 25.106 1.000 4.360 1.037 37.572 7.000 128

Block 1: Method = Forward wise (Conditional) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients 1 2 3 Block Model Block Model Block Model Chi-square df Sig. 25.180 1.000 25.180 1.000 25.180 1.000 6.795 1.009 31.976 2.000 31.976 2.000 5.512 1.019 37.488 3.000 37.488 3.000 1 2 3 Model Summary -2 Log Cox & Snell Nagelkerke likelihood R Square R Square 133.596 a.148.233 126.800 a.184.290 121.288 a.212.334 a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than.001. Classification Table a Observed 1 Kejadian ISPA Pada Overall Percentage 2 Kejadian ISPA Pada Overall Percentage 3 Kejadian ISPA Pada Overall Percentage a. The cut value is.500 Tidak ISPA ISPA Tidak ISPA ISPA Tidak ISPA ISPA Predicted Percentage Tidak ISPA ISPA Correct 0 32.0 0 125 100.0 79.6 18 14 56.3 17 108 86.4 80.3 6 26 18.8 4 121 96.8 80.9 129

Variables in the Equation vent 1 a Constant pdptnkelk 2 b vent Constant 95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper 2.139.470 20.687 1.000 8.494 3.379 21.355.392.259 2.293 1.130 1.480 1.209.487 6.156 1.013 3.349 1.289 8.702 2.258.486 21.593 1.000 9.560 3.689 24.774 -.095.323.086 1.769.910 3 c asi pdptnkelk vent Constant a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: vent. b. Variable(s) entered on step 2: pdptnkelk. c. Variable(s) entered on step 3: asi. 1.165.497 5.504 1.019 3.207 1.211 8.490 1.200.500 5.763 1.016 3.321 1.246 8.849 2.317.502 21.309 1.000 10.150 3.794 27.152 -.942.499 3.569 1.059.390 Model if Term Removed a Variable 1 2 vent pdptnkelk vent Change in Model Log -2 Log Sig. of the Likelihood Likelihood df Change -80.796 27.997 1.000-66.866 6.931 1.008-78.097 29.393 1.000 3 asi -63.454 5.620 1.018 pdptnkelk -63.884 6.480 1.011 vent -75.384 29.481 1.000 a. Based on conditional parameter estimates Variables not in the Equation 1 2 3 Variables Overall Statistics Variables Overall Statistics Variables Overall Statistics statusgizk asi Imun pdptnkelk klembabnk kpdtn statusgizk asi Imun klembabnk kpdtn statusgizk Imun klembabnk kpdtn Score df Sig. 2.835 1.092 6.295 1.012 3.296 1.069 6.486 1.011.423 1.516 2.843 1.092 14.487 6.025 2.866 1.090 5.790 1.016 2.734 1.098.116 1.734 1.340 1.247 8.423 5.134 1.346 1.246 1.492 1.222.018 1.894.469 1.493 2.893 4.576 130

Unweighted Cases Selected Cases Unselected Cases a. UJI INTERAKSI Logistic Regression a Case Processing Summary Included in Analysis Missing Cases If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. N Percent 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Tidak ISPA ISPA Internal Value 0 1 Block 0: Beginning Block Classification Table a,b Observed 0 Kejadian ISPA Pada Overall Percentage Tidak ISPA ISPA a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is.500 Predicted Percentage Tidak ISPA ISPA Correct 0 32.0 0 125 100.0 79.6 Variables in the Equation 0 Constant B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 1.363.198 47.302 1.000 3.906 0 Variables Overall Statistics Variables not in the Equation asi pdptnkelk vent asi by pdptnkelk Block 1: Method = Enter Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Score df Sig. 6.493 1.011 5.133 1.023 25.106 1.000 8.122 1.004 35.573 4.000 1 Block Model Chi-square df Sig. 38.224 4.000 38.224 4.000 38.224 4.000 Model Summary 1-2 Log likelihood 120.552 a Cox & Snell R Square.216 Nagelkerke R Square.340 a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than.001. 131

Classification Table a Observed 1 Kejadian ISPA Pada Overall Percentage a. The cut value is.500 Tidak ISPA ISPA Predicted Percentage Tidak ISPA ISPA Correct 10 22 31.3 6 119 95.2 82.2 Variables in the Equation 1 a asi pdptnkelk vent asi by pdptnkelk Constant 95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper.874.599 2.126 1.145 2.396.740 7.752.611.838.532 1.466 1.842.357 9.513 2.309.497 21.557 1.000 10.063 3.797 26.669.898 1.047.735 1.391 2.454.315 19.095 -.737.547 1.815 1.178.478 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: asi, pdptnkelk, vent, asi * pdptnkelk. Unweighted Cases Selected Cases a Logistic Regression Case Processing Summary Included in Analysis Missing Cases Unselected Cases a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. N Percent 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Original Value Tidak ISPA ISPA Dependent Variable Encoding Internal Value 0 1 Block 0: Beginning Block Classification Table a,b Observed 0 Kejadian ISPA Pada Overall Percentage a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is.500 Tidak ISPA ISPA Predicted Percentage Tidak ISPA ISPA Correct 0 32.0 0 125 100.0 79.6 Variables in the Equation 0 Constant B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 1.363.198 47.302 1.000 3.906 Variables not in the Equation 0 Variables Overall Statistics asi pdptnkelk vent asi by vent Score df Sig. 6.493 1.011 5.133 1.023 25.106 1.000 19.348 1.000 37.254 4.000 132

Block 1: Method = Enter Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients 1 Block Model Chi-square df Sig. 37.526 4.000 37.526 4.000 37.526 4.000 Model Summary 1 a. -2 Log Cox & Snell Nagelkerke likelihood R Square R Square 121.250 a.213.334 Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because parameter estimates changed by less than.001. Classification Table a 1 a. Observed Kejadian ISPA Pada Overall Percentage The cut value is.500 Tidak ISPA ISPA Predicted Percentage Tidak ISPA ISPA Correct 6 26 18.8 4 121 96.8 80.9 Variables in the Equation 1 a asi pdptnkelk vent asi by vent Constant 95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper 1.240.631 3.865 1.049 3.456 1.004 11.900 1.204.502 5.756 1.016 3.334 1.247 8.919 2.447.839 8.502 1.004 11.552 2.230 59.834 -.201 1.033.038 1.846.818.108 6.195 -.999.580 2.965 1.085.368 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: asi, pdptnkelk, vent, asi * vent. Unweighted Cases Selected Cases a Logistic Regression Case Processing Summary Included in Analysis Missing Cases Unselected Cases a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Block 0: Beginning Block Classification Table a,b N Percent 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Observed 0 Kejadian ISPA Pada Overall Percentage a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is.500 Tidak ISPA ISPA Predicted Percentage Tidak ISPA ISPA Correct 0 32.0 0 125 100.0 79.6 133

Variables in the Equation 0 Constant B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 1.363.198 47.302 1.000 3.906 0 Variables Overall Statistics Variables not in the Equation asi pdptnkelk vent pdptnkelk by vent Block 1: Method = Enter Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Score df Sig. 6.493 1.011 5.133 1.023 25.106 1.000 10.577 1.001 37.028 4.000 1 Block Model Chi-square df Sig. 37.620 4.000 37.620 4.000 37.620 4.000 Model Summary 1-2 Log likelihood 121.155 a Cox & Snell R Square.213 Nagelkerke R Square.335 a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because parameter estimates changed by less than.001. Classification Table a Observed 1 Kejadian ISPA Pada Overall Percentage a. The cut value is.500 Tidak ISPA ISPA Predicted Percentage Tidak ISPA ISPA Correct 6 26 18.8 4 121 96.8 80.9 Variables in the Equation 1 a asi pdptnkelk vent pdptnkelk by vent Constant 95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper 1.161.496 5.485 1.019 3.193 1.208 8.437 1.099.572 3.696 1.055 3.001.979 9.198 2.218.568 15.258 1.000 9.191 3.020 27.974.442 1.247.125 1.723 1.555.135 17.911 -.902.510 3.126 1.077.406 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: asi, pdptnkelk, vent, pdptnkelk * vent. 134

GAMBAR Gambar 1. Beberapa responden beserta anak balitanya yang menderita ISPA, sekeluarga tinggal di kamar yang ukurannya 3x4 meter persegi, dengan kondisi rumah yang tidak memenuhi syarat kesehatan. 135

Gambar 2. Responden dan anak Gambar 3. Responden dan anak nya yang menderita ISPA, balitanya yang sudah berusia dimana dinding rumahnya 2 tahun tapi mengalami terbuat dari seng. gangguan jantung, berat badan anaknya 5 kg. Gambar 4. Gambar sebagian kondisi lingkungan rumah responden di wilayah Kelurahan Ilir. 136