LAMPIRAN
LAMPIRAN 1 Tabel Ranking Severity Ranking Effect Criteria : Severity of Effect 10 Hazardous Hazardous effect without warnin. Safety related. Regulatory non-complaint. 9 Serious Potential hazzardous effect. Able to stop without wishap. Regulatory compliance in jeopardy. 8 Extreme Item operable but safe. Costumer very dissatisfied. 7 Major Performance severely affected but functional and safe. Costumer dissatisfied. 6 Significat Performance degraded but operable and safe. Non vital part inoperable. Costumer experience discomfort 5 Moderate Performance moderely affected. Fault on non vital part need repair. Costumer experience some dissatisfactin. 4 Minor Minor effect on performnace. Fault does not require repair. Non vital fault always noticed. 3 Slight Slight effect on performance. Non vital fault notice most of the time. Costumer is slight annoyed. 2 Very Slight Very slight effect on performance. Non-vital fault may be noticed. Costumer is not annoyed. 1 None No effect
LAMPIRAN 2 Tabel Ranking Occurrence Ranking Possible Failure Rates Probability of Failure 10 1 in 2 Almost certain 9 1 in 3 Very high 8 1 in 8 High 7 1 in 20 Moderately high 6 1 in 80 Medium 5 1 in 400 Low 4 1 in 2.000 slight 3 1 in 15.000 Very slight 2 1 in 150.000 Remote 1 1 in 1.500.000 Almost imposibble
LAMPIRAN 3 Tabel Ranking Detectability Ranking Detection Criteria : Likelihood of Detection by Design Control 10 Absolute No design control or design control will not detect Uncertainty potential causes. 9 Very Remote Very remote chance design will detect potential causes. 8 Remote Remote chance design will detect potential causes. 7 Very Low Very low chance design will detect potential causes. 6 Low Low chance design will detect potential causes. 5 Moderate Moderate chance design will detect potential causes. 4 Moderately Moderately high chance design will detect potential High causes. 3 High High chance design will detect potential causes. 2 Very high Very high chance design will detect potential causes. 1 Almost Almost certain That the design control will detect Certain potential causes.
LAMPIRAN 4 Simbol simbol yang digunakan dalam Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) Top Event atau Intermediate Event (masalah utama yang terjadi) Basic Event (Kejadian Paling Dasar) OR Gate AND Gate Undeveloped Event Transfer Gate
SURAT KETERANGAN PERUSAHAAN Dalam surat ini menyatakan bahwa mahasiswa Universitas Kristen Maranatha yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini : Nama : Tresna Egy Suwandi NRP : 0823069 Jurusan / Fakultas : Teknik Industri / Teknik Bahwa benar telah melakukan penelitian untuk keperluan Tugas Akhir di PT. Setiatex. Demikian surat keterangan ini dibuat untuk keperluan kelengkapan akademik dalam mencapai gelar Sarjana Strata Satu (S1) pada jurusan Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Bandung melalui laporan tugas akhir mahasiswa tersebut Bandung, 29 Juni 2012 PT Setiatex
KOMENTAR DAN SARAN SIDANG Nama : Tresna Egy Suwandi NRP : 0823069 Nama Dosen Pembimbing : Rudijanto Muis, S.T., M.T. Nama Dosen Penguji : 1. Ir. Christina Wirawan, M.T. 2. Christina, S.T., M.T. 3. Ir. Rudy Wawolumaja, M.Sc. Komentar dan Saran : Perhatikan Pengetikan sesuai EYD. Usulan lebih diperjelas dan kongkrit. Perjelas dan perbaiki butir butir perumusan penelitian. Perjelas dan perbaiki butir butir tujuan penelitian. Cek kembali FTA secara logis.
DATA PENULIS Nama : Tresna Egy Suwandi NRP : 0823069 Alamat : Jalan Mutiara-Sampora No. 23 Kp. Sekeawi Desa Sukamenak Kec. Margahayu Kab. Bandung Tempat Tanggal Lahir : Bandung, 04 Agustus 1990 Alamat email : egy.kuman@yahoo.com / tresnaegysuwandi@rocketmail.com / tresnaegysuwandi@gmail.com Pendidikan : Sekolah Dasar Negeri Sukamenak V (1996 2002) Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 38 Bandung (2002 2005) Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 11 Bandung (2005 2008) Universitas Kristen Maranatha (2008 2012) Tanggal Sidang : 01 Agustus 2012 Nilai Sidang : A (3,46)