10. Gabriella M van Dijk, Cindy Veenhof, Francous Shchellevis, Harry Hulsmans, Jan PJ Bakker, Henk Arwert, et al. Comorbidity, limitations in

Transkripsi

1 64 DAFTAR PUSTAKA 1. Panjaitan, R. Pharmaceutical care untuk pasien penyakit artritis rematik. Jakarta: Direktorat Bina Farmasi Komunitas dan Klinik, Ditjen Bina Kefarmasian dan Alat Kesehatan, Departemen Kesehatan; Andriyasa, K, Tjokorda Raka Putra. Korelasi antara derajat beratnya osteoartritis lutut dan cartilage oligomeric matrix protein serum. J Peny Dalam. 2012: 13(1): M.A., Sabara-Saga. Diet intensif dan aktifitas fisik untuk wanita lansia penderita osteoartritis dengan obesitas. Medula. 2013: 2(1): Nursyarifah, R.S. Hubungan antara obesitas dengan kejadian osteoartritis lutut di RSUP dr. Kariadi Semarang. Semarang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang; Koentjoro, Sara Listyani, J. Adji Suroso, Bantar Suntoko. Hubungan antara indeks massa tubuh (IMT) dengan derajat osteoartritis lutut menurut Kellgren-Lawrence. Semarang: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro; Altman, R.D. Criteria for the classification of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip. Scand J Rheumatology. 1987; (Suppl.65): Soeroso J, Isbagio H, Kalim H, Broto R, Pramudiyo R. Osteoartritis. In: Sudoyo AW, Setiyohadi B, Alwi I, Simadibrata M, Setiati S, editors. Buku ajar ilmu penyakit dalam. 4 th ed. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Ilmu Penyakit Dalam Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; p Firestein Gary S, Ralph C.Budd, Edward D. Harris, Iain B.McInnes, Shaun Ruddy, John S.Sergent. Kelley s textbook of rheumatology 8 th edition volume II. Canada: Saunders Elsevier; Moskowitz, Roland W., David S. Howell, Roy D. Altman, Joseph A. Buckwalter, Victor M. Goldberg. Osteoarthritis 3 rd edition diagnosis and medical / surgical management. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2001.

2 Gabriella M van Dijk, Cindy Veenhof, Francous Shchellevis, Harry Hulsmans, Jan PJ Bakker, Henk Arwert, et al. Comorbidity, limitations in activities and pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008;9: Palmer, Keith T. Occupational activities and osteoarthritis of the knee. British Medical Bulletin. 2012; 102: Kulcu, Duygu Geler, Burcu Yanik, Hakan Atalar, Gulcin Gulsen. Associated factors with pain and disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Turkish Journal of Rheumatology. 2010; 25(2): (Abstrak) 13. Kalim, Handono, Sri Andarini, Faradiana Rasyidi. Hubungan indeks massa tubuh (IMT) dengan derajat nyeri pada penderita osteoartritis lutut. Malang: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya; Reijman, M., H A P Pols, A P Bergink, J M W Hazes, J N Belo, A M Lievense et al. Body mass index associated with onset and progression of osteoarthritis of the knee but not of the hip: The Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007; 66: Koesoemawati, Herni, Huriawati Hartanto, Ivo Novita Salim, Lyana Setiawan, Valleria, Wanny Suparman. Kamus kedokteran Dorland edisi 29. Jakarta: EGC; Marsland, Daniel, Sabrina Kapoor. Crash course rheumatology and orthopaedics 2 nd edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; Price, Sylvia A, Lorraine M. Wilson. Patofisiologi konsep klinis prosesproses penyakit edisi 6. Jakarta: EGC; Sadhana, Udadi. Patologi anatomi 2. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; Adnan HM. Diagnosis arthritis rheumatoid dan perbandingannya arthritisarthritis lain. Kongres Nasional I, Ikatan Reumatologi Indonesia, Semarang, 1983 :

3 Fauci, Anthony S., Dennis L. Kasper, Dan L. Longo, Eugene Braunwald, Stephen L. Hauser, J. Larry Jameson et al. Harrison s principles of general medicine 17 th edition p Maharani, Eka Pratiwi. Faktor-faktor risiko osteoartritis lutut. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; Soejoto, Soetedjo, Sultana MH Faradz, RB Bambang W, Neni Susilaningsih, Ratna D Purnawati et al. Lecture notes histologi I. Semarang: Bagian Histologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; JF, Woessner, Gunja-Smith Z. Role of metalloproteinases in human osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1991; 27: Patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: an important subgroup of knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2007; 46(7): (Abstrak) 25. Wahyuningsih, Nur Aini Sri. Hubungan obesitas dengan osteoartritis lutut pada lansia di Kelurahan Puncangsawit Kecamatan Jebres Surakarta. Surakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta; Ambardini, Rachmah Laksmi. Peran Latihan Fisik dalam Manajemen Terpadu Osteoartritis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. 27. Waddell D.D. Integrating viscosupplementation into a comprehensive osteoarthritis treatment program. Medscape Multispecialty; Cooper C et al. in: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS, eds, Osteoarthritis. Oxford, NY. Oxford University Press; 1998, page Marc C. Hochberg et al. Recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care & Research. 2012; 64(4): Syarif, Amir, Ari Estuningtyas, Arini Setiawati, H. Armen Muchtar, Azalla Arif, Bahroelim Bahry et al. Farmakologi dan terapi edisi 5. Jakarta: Departemen Farmakologi dan Terapeutik Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2007.

4 Dieppe, Paul A., Lohmander L. Stefan. Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis. The Lancet. 2005; 365 : Lequesne MG. The algofunctional indices for hip and knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997; 24(4): Basaran, S., Rengin Guzel, Gulsah Seydaoglu, Fusun Guler-Uysal. Validity, reliability, and comparison of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and Lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 29: Murphy L, Bolen J, Helmick CG, Brady TJ. Comorbidities are very common among people with arthritis. Poster th National Conference on Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, CDC. Feb Sabah J-M AL Rubiae, Ali AL-Qazaz. The frequency of comorbidities associated with knee osteoarthritis in men and women in Babylon and their impact on pain. Medical Journla of Babylon. 2014; 8: Leite, Alice Abath, Aline Jurema Gesteira Costa et al. co morbidities in patients with osteoarthritis: frequency and impact on pain and physical function. Rev Bras Reumatol 2011;51(2): Schmitt, Laura C et al. Instability, laxity, and physical function in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. Dec 2008; 88(12): Kim KW, Han JW, Cho HJ, Chang CB, Park JH, Lee JJ et al. Association between comorbid depression and osteoarthritis symptom severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg AM Mar 16;93(6): (Abstrak) 39. Mansournia MA et al. Effect of physical activity on functional performance and knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis : analysis with marginal structural models. Epidemiology Jul;23(4): Bosomworth, N.J. Exercise and knee osteoarthritis: benefit or hazard? CFP (Canadian Family Physician) Sept:55(9): (Full text) 41. Niu J, Zhang YQ, Torner J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P, et al. Is obesity a risk factor for progressive radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum Mar 15;61(3): (Abstrak)

5 Graverand MPHL, Brandt K, Mazzuca SA, Raunig D, Vignon E. Progressive increase in body mass index is not associated with a progressive increase in joint space narrowing in obese women with osteoarthritis of the knee. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2009;68: (Abstrak) 43. N. Belo J, Berger MY, Reijman M, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Prognostic factors of progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Rheum Feb 15;57(1):13-26.(Abstrak) 44. Manninen, P., H. Riihimäki, M. Heliövaara, O. Suomalainen. Physical exercise and risk of severe knee osteoarthritis requiring arthroplasty. Oxford Journals. Rheumatology (2001) 40 (4):

6 Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearance 69

7 Lampiran 2. Ijin penelitian 70

8 71

9 72 Lampiran 3. Sampel Informed consent JUDUL PENELITIAN : Hubungan antara Faktor Risiko Osteoartritis Lutut dengan Nyeri, Disabilitas, dan Berat Ringannya Osteoartritis INSTANSI PELAKSANA : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang PENELITI : Maya Yanuarty (CP : ) Bapak/Ibu Yth : Persetujuan Setelah Penjelasan (INFORMED CONSENT) Peneliti tersebut di atas adalah Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro yang bermaksud ingin melibatkan Bapak/Ibu untuk menjadi responden dalam penelitian ini dengan tujuan mengetahui hubungan antara faktor risiko osteoartritis lutut dengan nyeri, disabilitas, dan berat ringannya osteoartritis. Osteoartritis sendiri merupakan peradangan pada sendi yang menyebabkan timbulnya rasa nyeri dan kaku pada sendi yang terkena. Penelitian ini bermanfaat dalam bidang akademik yaitu sebagai sumbangan ilmu pengetahuan. Keuntungan yang dapat diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah Bapak/Ibu dapat mengetahui faktor risiko osteoartritis lutut yang Bapak/Ibu miliki yang berkaitan dengan nyeri dan kaku sendi, apabila Bapak/Ibu menghubungi peneliti dalam waktu minimal 3 bulan setelah penelitian. Penelitian ini juga dapat bermanfaat dalam bidang pelayanan kesehatan, yaitu sebagai pertimbangan penerapan terapi dan edukasi lebih lanjut pada pasien osteoartritis lutut selanjutnya. Peneliti akan melakukan wawancara, pengukuran tinggi dan berat badan kepada Bapak/Ibu, dan mengumpulkan data yang ada di rekam medis tentang berat ringannya osteoartritis lutut. Peneliti menjamin kerahasiaan identitas dan informasi yang diberikan. Informasi tersebut hanya digunakan untuk kepentingan penelitian serta pengembangan ilmu kedokteran. Apabila dalam perjalanan nantinya, Bapak/Ibu menghendaki mengundurkan diri, maka peneliti menghormati keinginan tersebut. Pada akhir wawancara, peneliti akan memberikan sebuah souvenir / bingkisan sebagai ungkapan terima kasih atas kerjasama Bapak/Ibu.

10 73

11 74 Lampiran 4. Spreadsheet data No Nama Usia Sex BB TB IMT Kriteria IMT Komorbid 1 K 59 P Obesitas derajat P 55 P Normal <3 3 W 61 P Obesitas derajat 1 > 3 4 S 66 P Obesitas derajat 2 > 3 5 M 58 L Normal > 3 6 M 69 P Obesitas derajat 1 <3 7 MD 68 L Obesitas derajat 1 > 3 8 P 57 P Overweight > 3 9 S 51 L Obesitas derajat 2 <3 10 EY 54 P Obesitas derajat 1 > 3 11 Z 58 P Underweight 0 12 W 67 L Normal <3 13 PN 61 P Overweight <3 14 SS 65 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 15 JH 57 P Obesitas derajat 1 > 3 16 S 74 P Normal <3 17 SH 74 L Obesitas derajat 1 <3 18 SW 52 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 19 I 62 P Overweight <3 20 ES 56 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 21 S 58 P Obesitas derajat 1 > 3 22 S 60 P Obesitas derajat 1 <3 23 NM 52 P Obesitas derajat 2 > 3 24 S 66 L Normal <3 25 SR 60 P Overweight 0 26 S 66 P Overweight > 3 27 EI 57 P Obesitas derajat 1 <3 28 S 73 P Underweight > 3 29 SM 51 P Obesitas derajat 1 <3 30 MA 65 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 31 M 52 P Obesitas derajat 2 > 3 32 S 68 P Obesitas derajat 1 > 3 33 TNS 58 P Obesitas derajat 2 > 3

12 75 No Aktivitas Fisik Riwayat Fisioterapi Nyeri Disabilitas Kriteria skor WOMAC Grade OA 1 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 2 2 No weight bearing ya Berat Berat Berat Grade 1 3 No weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4 4 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 3 5 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 1 6 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 4 7 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Sedang Grade 3 8 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 3 9 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Sedang Grade 4 10 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4 11 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1 12 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2 13 No weight bearing ya Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 3 14 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Sedang Grade 4 15 No weight bearing ya Berat Sedang Sedang Grade 1 16 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2 17 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 3 18 Weight bearing tidak Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 3 19 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2 20 No weight bearing ya Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 2 21 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Ringan Grade 2 22 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2 23 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Sedang Grade 1 24 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 3 25 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2 26 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 3 27 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 3 28 No weight bearing tidak Berat Sedang Sedang Grade 3 29 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 2 30 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2 31 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 1 32 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1 33 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Sedang Grade 1

13 76 No Nama Usia Sex BB TB IMT Kriteria IMT Komorbid 34 AEL 54 P Obesitas derajat 2 > 3 35 S 76 L Underweight > 3 36 AR 51 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 37 S 74 L Obesitas derajat 1 > 3 38 R 55 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 39 KM 64 L Obesitas derajat 1 > 3 40 MYS 56 P Obesitas derajat 1 > 3 41 SD 57 P Overweight > 3 42 W 68 P Overweight <3 43 A 68 L Overweight > 3 44 S 53 L Overweight 0 45 R 69 P Overweight <3 46 R 51 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 47 R 72 L Obesitas derajat 1 <3 48 IS 64 P Obesitas derajat TMK 51 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 50 M 64 P Obesitas derajat 1 <3 51 S 53 L Obesitas derajat 1 <3 52 N 51 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 53 SBW 60 P Obesitas derajat 1 <3 54 R 55 P Obesitas derajat 2 > 3 55 R 51 P Obesitas derajat 1 <3 56 SM 59 P Obesitas derajat 1 <3 57 M 55 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 58 K 66 P Obesitas derajat 1 <3 59 S 64 L Obesitas derajat 2 > 3 60 I 67 P Obesitas derajat 1 <3 61 RO 56 P Normal <3 62 MK 74 L Normal 0 63 M 64 P Overweight <3 64 SN 70 P Obesitas derajat 2 <3 65 MSH 60 P Normal <3

14 77 No Aktivitas Fisik Riwayat Fisioterapi Nyeri Disabilitas Kriteria skor WOMAC Grade OA 34 No weight bearing ya Berat Sedang Sedang Grade 2 35 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Ringan Grade 2 36 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Sedang Grade 4 37 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Sedang Grade 2 38 No weight bearing ya Berat Sedang Sedang Grade 4 39 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2 40 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2 41 Weight bearing tidak Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2 42 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Berat Grade 1 43 No weight bearing ya Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 3 44 No weight bearing ya Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 1 45 No weight bearing tidak Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1 46 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 3 47 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Sedang Grade 3 48 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4 49 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4 50 No weight bearing tidak Ringan Sedang Ringan Grade 3 51 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4 52 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1 53 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1 54 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 1 55 Weight bearing tidak Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1 56 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 2 57 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4 58 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2 59 No weight bearing ya Berat Berat Berat Grade 4 60 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 4 61 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 3 62 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Berat Grade 3 63 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Ringan Grade 2 64 No weight bearing tidak Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 4 65 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1

15 78 Lampiran 5. Output analisis data Frequencies Jenis Kelamin Valid pria wanita Total Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Usia Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Total Statistics Usia N Valid 65 Missing 0 Mode 51 Minimum 51 Maximum 76 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic Df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Usia a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

16 79 Valid ya tidak Total Riwayat Fisioterapi Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Kriteria IMT Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Underweight Normal Overweight Obesitas derajat Obesitas derajat Total Penyakit Komorbid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak ada Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid Total Valid Aktivitas Fisik Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Weight bearing No weight bearing Total Nyeri Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Ringan Sedang Berat Total

17 80 Disabilitas Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Ringan Sedang Berat Total Grade OA Lutut Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Grade Grade Grade Grade Total Kriteria IMT * Nyeri Kriteria IMT * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Ringan Sedang Berat Total Kriteria IMT Underweight Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 6.3%.0% 16.7% 4.6% % of Total 3.1%.0% 1.5% 4.6% Normal Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 15.6% 7.4% 16.7% 12.3% % of Total 7.7% 3.1% 1.5% 12.3% Overweight Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 15.6% 22.2%.0% 16.9% % of Total 7.7% 9.2%.0% 16.9% Obesitas derajat 1 Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 46.9% 22.2% 16.7% 33.8% % of Total 23.1% 9.2% 1.5% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 2 Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 15.6% 48.1% 50.0% 32.3% % of Total 7.7% 20.0% 4.6% 32.3% Total Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0%

18 81 Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.28. Kriteria IMT * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Ringan Sedang / Berat Total Kriteria IMT Underweight / Normal Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 21.9% 12.1% 16.9% % of Total 10.8% 6.2% 16.9% Overweight Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 15.6% 18.2% 16.9% % of Total 7.7% 9.2% 16.9% Obesitas derajat 1 Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 46.9% 21.2% 33.8% % of Total 23.1% 10.8% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 2 Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 15.6% 48.5% 32.3% % of Total 7.7% 24.6% 32.3% Total Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 50.8% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.42.

19 82 Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Ringan Sedang Berat Total Penyakit Tidak ada Count Komorbid Expected Count % within 6.3% 14.8%.0% 9.2% Nyeri % of Total 3.1% 6.2%.0% 9.2% Memiliki 1-3 penyakit Count komorbid Expected Count % within 62.5% 51.9% 33.3% 55.4% Nyeri % of Total 30.8% 21.5% 3.1% 55.4% Memiliki > 3 penyakit Count komorbid Expected Count % within 31.3% 33.3% 66.7% 35.4% Nyeri % of Total 15.4% 13.8% 6.2% 35.4% Total Count Expected Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Nyeri % of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.55. Penyakit Komorbid Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Sedang / Ringan Berat Total Tidak ada / Memiliki 1-3 Count penyakit komorbid Expected Count % within Nyeri 37.5% 51.5% 44.6% % of Total 18.5% 26.2% 44.6% Memiliki > 3 penyakit Count komorbid Expected Count % within Nyeri 62.5% 48.5% 55.4% % of Total 30.8% 24.6% 55.4%

20 dimension1 83 Total Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 50.8% 100.0% Asymp. Sig. Value Df (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Continuity Correction b Likelihood Ratio Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Ringan Sedang Berat Total Aktivitas Fisik Weight Count bearing Expected Count % within Nyeri 9.4% 22.2%.0% 13.8% % of Total 4.6% 9.2%.0% 13.8% No Count Weight Expected Count bearing % within Nyeri 90.6% 77.8% 100.0% 86.2% % of Total 44.6% 32.3% 9.2% 86.2% Total Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.83. Nyeri Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik N Weight bearing 9 No weight bearing 56 Total 65

21 dimension1 84 Test Statistics a Nyeri Most Extreme Differences Absolute.185 Positive.185 Negative Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z.514 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed).954 a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri Crosstabulation Nyeri Ringan Sedang Berat Total Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 84.4% 70.4% 83.3% 78.5% % of Total 41.5% 29.2% 7.7% 78.5% tidak Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 15.6% 29.6% 16.7% 21.5% % of Total 7.7% 12.3% 1.5% 21.5% Total Count Expected Count % within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is Nyeri Frequencies Riwayat Fisioterapi N ya 51 tidak 14 Total 65 Test Statistics a Nyeri Most Extreme Differences Absolute.172 Positive.172 Negative Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z.571 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed).900 a. Grouping Variable: Riwayat Fisioterapi

22 85 Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Ringan Sedang Berat Total Kriteria Underweight Count IMT Expected Count % within Disabilitas 3.3% 7.4%.0% 4.6% % of Total 1.5% 3.1%.0% 4.6% Normal Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 16.7% 3.7% 25.0% 12.3% % of Total 7.7% 1.5% 3.1% 12.3% Overweight Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 23.3% 11.1% 12.5% 16.9% % of Total 10.8% 4.6% 1.5% 16.9% Obesitas derajat 1 Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 40.0% 33.3% 12.5% 33.8% % of Total 18.5% 13.8% 1.5% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 2 Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 16.7% 44.4% 50.0% 32.3% % of Total 7.7% 18.5% 6.2% 32.3% Total Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.37. Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Sedang / Ringan Berat Total Kriteria IMT Underweight / Normal Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 20.0% 14.3% 16.9% % of Total 9.2% 7.7% 16.9% Overweight Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 23.3% 11.4% 16.9% % of Total 10.8% 6.2% 16.9%

23 86 Obesitas derajat 1 Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 40.0% 28.6% 33.8% % of Total 18.5% 15.4% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 2 Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 16.7% 45.7% 32.3% % of Total 7.7% 24.6% 32.3% Total Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 53.8% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Ringan Sedang Berat Total Penyakit Tidak ada Count Komorbid Expected Count % within 10.0% 7.4% 12.5% 9.2% Disabilitas % of Total 4.6% 3.1% 1.5% 9.2% Memiliki 1-3 penyakit Count komorbid Expected Count % within 73.3% 29.6% 75.0% 55.4% Disabilitas % of Total 33.8% 12.3% 9.2% 55.4% Memiliki > 3 penyakit Count komorbid Expected Count % within 16.7% 63.0% 12.5% 35.4% Disabilitas % of Total 7.7% 26.2% 1.5% 35.4% Total Count Expected Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Disabilitas % of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0%

24 87 Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.74. Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Sedang / Ringan Berat Total Penyakit Tidak ada / Memiliki 1- Count Komorbid 3 penyakit komorbid Expected Count % within 40.0% 48.6% 44.6% Disabilitas % of Total 18.5% 26.2% 44.6% Memiliki > 3 penyakit Count komorbid Expected Count % within 60.0% 51.4% 55.4% Disabilitas % of Total 27.7% 27.7% 55.4% Total Count Expected Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Disabilitas % of Total 46.2% 53.8% 100.0% Asymp. Sig. Value df (2- Pearson Chi-Square.480 a Continuity Correction b Likelihood Ratio Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Aktivitas Fisik * Disabilitas Aktivitas Fisik Weight bearing Aktivitas Fisik * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Ringan Sedang Berat Total Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 13.3% 18.5%.0% 13.8% % of Total 6.2% 7.7%.0% 13.8%

25 dimension1 88 No weight bearing Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 86.7% 81.5% 100.0% 86.2% % of Total 40.0% 33.8% 12.3% 86.2% Total Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is Disabilitas Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik N Weight bearing 9 No weight bearing 56 Total 65 Test Statistics a Disabilitas Most Extreme Differences Absolute.143 Positive.020 Negative Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z.398 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed).997 a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik Riwayat Fisioterapi * Disabilitas Riwayat Fisioterapi * Disabilitas Crosstabulation Disabilitas Ringan Sedang Berat Total Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 80.0% 70.4% 100.0% 78.5% % of Total 36.9% 29.2% 12.3% 78.5% tidak Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 20.0% 29.6%.0% 21.5% % of Total 9.2% 12.3%.0% 21.5% Total Count Expected Count % within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0%

26 89 Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is Kriteria IMT * Nyeri dan Disabilitas Kriteria IMT Kriteria IMT * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Ringan Sedang Berat Total Underweight Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 5.9% 3.7%.0% 4.6% % of Total 3.1% 1.5%.0% 4.6% Normal Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 14.7% 3.7% 50.0% 12.3% % of Total 7.7% 1.5% 3.1% 12.3% Overweight Count Obesitas derajat 1 Obesitas derajat 2 Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 23.5% 7.4% 25.0% 16.9% % of Total 12.3% 3.1% 1.5% 16.9% Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 41.2% 29.6%.0% 33.8% % of Total 21.5% 12.3%.0% 33.8% Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 14.7% 55.6% 25.0% 32.3% % of Total 7.7% 23.1% 1.5% 32.3% Total Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0%

27 90 Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.18. Kriteria IMT Underweight / Normal Kriteria IMT * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Ringan Sedang/Berat Total Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 20.6% 12.9% 16.9% % of Total 10.8% 6.2% 16.9% Overweight Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 23.5% 9.7% 16.9% % of Total 12.3% 4.6% 16.9% Obesitas derajat 1 Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 41.2% 25.8% 33.8% % of Total 21.5% 12.3% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 2 Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 14.7% 51.6% 32.3% % of Total 7.7% 24.6% 32.3% Total Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 52.3% 47.7% 100.0% Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.25.

28 91 Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri dan Disabilitas Penyakit Komorbid * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Ringan Sedang Berat Total Penyakit Tidak ada Count Komorbid Expected Count % within Kriteria 8.8% 7.4% 25.0% 9.2% Skor WOMAC % of Total 4.6% 3.1% 1.5% 9.2% Memiliki 1-3 Count penyakit komorbid Expected Count % within Kriteria 70.6% 37.0% 50.0% 55.4% Skor WOMAC % of Total 36.9% 15.4% 3.1% 55.4% Memiliki > 3 Count penyakit komorbid Expected Count % within Kriteria 20.6% 55.6% 25.0% 35.4% Skor WOMAC % of Total 10.8% 23.1% 1.5% 35.4% Total Count Expected Count % within Kriteria 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Skor WOMAC % of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.37.

29 92 Penyakit Komorbid * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Sedang / Ringan Berat Total Penyakit Tidak ada / Memiliki Count Komorbid 1-3 penyakit komorbid Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor 41.2% 48.4% 44.6% WOMAC % of Total 21.5% 23.1% 44.6% Memiliki > 3 penyakit Count komorbid Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor 58.8% 51.6% 55.4% WOMAC % of Total 30.8% 24.6% 55.4% Total Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% WOMAC % of Total 52.3% 47.7% 100.0% Asymp. Sig. Value df (2- Pearson Chi-Square.341 a Continuity Correction b Likelihood Ratio Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

30 dimension1 93 Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri dan Disabilitas Aktivitas Fisik * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Ringan Sedang Berat Total Aktivitas Fisik Weight Count bearing Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor 11.8% 18.5%.0% 13.8% WOMAC % of Total 6.2% 7.7%.0% 13.8% No Count weight Expected Count bearing % within Kriteria Skor 88.2% 81.5% 100.0% 86.2% WOMAC % of Total 46.2% 33.8% 6.2% 86.2% Total Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% WOMAC % of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.55. Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik N Kriteria Skor WOMAC Weight bearing 9 No Weight bearing 56 Total 65 Test Statistics a Kriteria Skor WOMAC Most Extreme Differences Absolute.091 Positive.091 Negative Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z.254 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik

31 dimension1 94 Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri dan Disabilitas Riwayat Fisioterapi * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation Kriteria Skor WOMAC Ringan Sedang Berat Total Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 79.4% 74.1% 100.0% 78.5% % of Total 41.5% 30.8% 6.2% 78.5% tidak Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 20.6% 25.9%.0% 21.5% % of Total 10.8% 10.8%.0% 21.5% Total Count Expected Count % within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0% Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases Asymp. Sig. Value df ( a a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.86. Frequencies Fisioterapi N Kriteria Skor WOMAC ya 51 tidak 14 Total Test Statistics a Kriteria Skor WOMAC Most Extreme Differences Absolute.078 Positive.029 Negative Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z.260 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Fisioterapi

32 95 Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Lutut Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Lutut Crosstabulation Grade OA Lutut Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Total Kriteria Underweight Count IMT Expected Count % within Grade OA.0% 6.3% 5.3% 6.3% 4.6% Lutut % of Total.0% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 4.6% Normal Count Expected Count % within Grade OA.0% 18.8% 10.5% 18.8% 12.3% Lutut % of Total.0% 4.6% 3.1% 4.6% 12.3% Overweight Count Expected Count % within Grade OA.0% 25.0% 21.1% 18.8% 16.9% Lutut % of Total.0% 6.2% 6.2% 4.6% 16.9% Obesitas Count derajat 1 Expected Count % within Grade OA 35.7% 31.3% 42.1% 25.0% 33.8% Lutut % of Total 7.7% 7.7% 12.3% 6.2% 33.8% Obesitas Count derajat 2 Expected Count % within Grade OA 64.3% 18.8% 21.1% 31.3% 32.3% Lutut % of Total 13.8% 4.6% 6.2% 7.7% 32.3% Total Count Expected Count % within Grade OA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Lutut % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 14 cells (70.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.65.

33 96 Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Grade 3/4 Grade 2 Grade 1 Total Kriteria Underweight / Normal / Count IMT Overweight Expected Count % within Grade 26.7% 36.8% 43.8% 33.8% OA % of Total 12.3% 10.8% 10.8% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 1 Count Expected Count % within Grade 33.3% 42.1% 25.0% 33.8% OA % of Total 15.4% 12.3% 6.2% 33.8% Obesitas derajat 2 Count Expected Count % within Grade 40.0% 21.1% 31.3% 32.3% OA % of Total 18.5% 6.2% 7.7% 32.3% Total Count Expected Count % within Grade 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% OA % of Total 46.2% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.17.

34 97 Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Lutut Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Total Penyakit Tidak ada Count Komorbid Expected Count % within 7.1% 6.3% 10.5% 12.5% 9.2% Grade OA % of Total 1.5% 1.5% 3.1% 3.1% 9.2% Memiliki 1-3 Count penyakit komorbid Expected Count % within 71.4% 56.3% 52.6% 43.8% 55.4% Grade OA % of Total 15.4% 13.8% 15.4% 10.8% 55.4% Memiliki > 3 Count penyakit komorbid Expected Count % within 21.4% 37.5% 36.8% 43.8% 35.4% Grade OA % of Total 4.6% 9.2% 10.8% 10.8% 35.4% Total Count Expected Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Grade OA % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 5 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is Penyakit Komorbid Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Total Tidak ada / Count Memiliki 1-3 Expected penyakit komorbid Count % within 71.4% 31.3% 26.3% 56.3% 44.6% Grade OA % of Total 15.4% 7.7% 7.7% 13.8% 44.6%

35 98 Memiliki > 3 Count penyakit komorbid Expected Count % within 28.6% 68.8% 73.7% 43.8% 55.4% Grade OA % of Total 6.2% 16.9% 21.5% 10.8% 55.4% Total Count Expected Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Grade OA % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is Aktivitas Fisik * Grade OA Lutut Aktivitas Fisik * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Total Aktivitas Weight Count Fisik bearing Expected Count % within Grade 14.3% 12.5% 15.8% 12.5% 13.8% OA % of Total 3.1% 3.1% 4.6% 3.1% 13.8% No Count weight Expected Count bearing % within Grade 85.7% 87.5% 84.2% 87.5% 86.2% OA % of Total 18.5% 21.5% 24.6% 21.5% 86.2% Total Count Expected Count % within Grade 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% OA % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square.111 a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.94.

36 dimension1 dimension1 99 Grade OA Frequencies Aktivitas Fisik N Weight bearing 9 No weight bearing 56 Total 65 Test Statistics a Grade OA Most Extreme Differences Absolute.028 Positive.020 Negative Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z.077 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik Riwayat Fisioterapi * Grade OA Lutut Riwayat Fisioterapi * Grade OA Crosstabulation Grade OA Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Total Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count Expected Count % within Grade OA 71.4% 75.0% 84.2% 81.3% 78.5% % of Total 15.4% 18.5% 24.6% 20.0% 78.5% tidak Count Expected Count % within Grade OA 28.6% 25.0% 15.8% 18.8% 21.5% % of Total 6.2% 6.2% 4.6% 4.6% 21.5% Total Count Expected Count % within Grade OA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0% Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square.968 a Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is Grade OA Lutut Frequencies Fisioterapi N ya 51 tidak 14 Total 65

37 100 Test Statistics a Grade OA Lutut Most Extreme Differences Absolute.140 Positive.000 Negative Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z.464 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed).982 a. Grouping Variable: Fisioterapi

38 101 Lampiran 6. Kuesioner penelitian KUESIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN ANTARA FAKTOR RISIKO OSTEOARTRITIS LUTUT DENGAN NYERI, DISABILITAS, DAN BERAT RINGANNYA OSTEOARTRITIS Tanggal diisi :. /. /. DATA UMUM DATA IDENTITAS PASIEN 1 No. ID Pasien :. 2 Nama Pasien :. 3 Alamat :.. RT. RW. Desa/Kel. Kec.... Kota 4 Jenis Kelamin : 1. Pria 2. Wanita 5 Usia :.. tahun 6 Tinggi Badan :... cm Berat Badan : kg 7 Status pernikahan : 1. Menikah 2. Belum menikah 3. Duda / Janda 8 Nomer telepon yang dapat dihubungi :.. KODE

39 102 Kuesioner WOMAC untuk pengukuran nyeri dan disabilitas pasien OA lutut 1. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri pada saat berjalan? 2. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri pada saat naik tangga? 3. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri pada malam hari? 4. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri pada saat beristirahat? 5. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri pada sendi-sendi? 6. Apakah Anda merasakan kekakuan sendi pada pagi hari? 7. Apakah Anda merasakan kekakuan sendi pada sore/malam hari? 8. Apakah Anda merasakan keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat menuruni tangga? 9. Apakah Anda merasakan keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat menaiki tangga? 10. Apakah Anda merasakan keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,...

40 103 saat berdiri dari duduk? 11. Apakah Anda merasakan Tidak Ya,... keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat berdiri? 12. Apakah Anda merasakan Tidak Ya,... keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada saat membungkuk ke lantai? 13. Apakah Anda merasakan Tidak Ya,... keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat berjalan di permukaan datar? 14. Apakah Anda merasakan Tidak Ya,... keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada saat masuk / keluar dari mobil? 15. Apakah Anda merasakan Tidak Ya,... keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat berbelanja? 16. Apakah Anda merasakan Tidak Ya,... keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat memakai kaos kaki? 17. Apakah Anda merasakan Tidak Ya,... keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat berbaring di tempat tidur? 18. Apakah Anda merasakan Tidak Ya,... keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat melepas kaos kaki? 19. Apakah Anda merasakan Tidak Ya,... keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada saat bangun dari tempat tidur?

41 Apakah Anda merasakan keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat mandi? 21. Apakah Anda merasakan keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat duduk? 22. Apakah Anda merasakan keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat ke toilet? 23. Apakah Anda merasakan keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada saat melakukan pekerjaan rumah tangga yang berat? 24. Apakah Anda merasakan keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada saat melakukan pekerjaan rumah tangga yang ringan? Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Tidak Ya,... Keterangan : Apabila jawaban ya, maka sebagai berikut. - Sedikit apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor lebih dari 0 hingga kurang dari 3. - Sedang apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor 3 hingga kurang dari 7. - Sangat apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor 7 hingga kurang dari 9. - Amat sangat apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor 9 hingga 10.

42 Lampiran 7. Dokumentasi penelitian 105

43 106 Lampiran 8. Biodata mahasiswa Identitas Nama : Maya Yanuarty NIM : Tempat/tanggal lahir : Pekalongan, 20 Januari 1993 Jenis kelamin : Perempuan Alamat : Jl. Kemakmuran no.1j, Pekalongan Nomor Telepon : - Nomor HP : maya_yanuarty@yahoo.com Riwayat Pendidikan Formal 1. SD : SD Pius Pekalongan Lulus tahun : SMP : SMP Pius Pekalongan Lulus tahun : SMA : SMA 1 Pekalongan Lulus tahun : FK UNDIP Masuk tahun : 2010 Keanggotaan Organisasi 1. OSIS SMA 1 Pekalongan Tahun 2008 s/d HIMA KU UNDIP Tahun 2010 s/d PSM FK UNDIP Tahun 2011 s/d PRMK FK UNDIP Tahun 2011 s/d OMK Banyumanik Tahun 2013 s/d sekarang Pengalaman penelitian - Pengalaman publikasi tulisan ilmiah - Pengalaman presentasi karya ilmiah - Pengalaman mengikuti lomba karya ilmiah -