LAMPIRA 1 HASIL UJI VALIDITAS DA RELIABILITAS CERQ 1. 1 Validitas Item dan Reliabilitas Dimensi Self Blame 1. 1. 1 Validitas Item Dimensi Self Blame Mean if if Item reg2 8,81 3,32,41,513 reg 8,35 2,99,297,588 reg1 7,85 2,97,235,48 reg28 8,75 2,4,4,31 1. 1. 2 Reliabilitas Dimensi Self Blame of Items,597 4 1. 2 Validitas Item dan Reliabilitas Dimensi Acceptance 1. 2. 1 Validitas Item Dimensi Acceptance Mean if if Item reg4 8,14 2,431,538,394 reg 7,7 3,14,321,92 reg23 7,81 2,497,478,481 1. 2. 2 Reliabilitas Dimensi Acceptance of Items,33 3
1. 3 Validitas Item dan Reliabilitas Dimensi Rumination 1. 3. 1 Validitas Item Dimensi Rumination Mean if if Item reg8,39 2,29,435,4 reg3 5,9 2,343,411,9 reg32,4 1,821,2,381 1. 3. 2 Reliabilitas Dimensi Rumination,72 3 of Items 1. 4 Validitas Item dan Reliabilitas Dimensi Positive Refocusing 1. 4. 1 Validitas Item Dimensi Positive Refocusing Mean if if Item reg3,51,873,447,734 reg13,74,,54,19 reg,4,882,488,7 reg2,78 5,781,574,5 1. 4. 2 Reliabilitas Dimensi Positive Refocusing of Items,744 4
1. 5 Validitas Item dan Reliabilitas Dimensi Refocus on Planning 1. 5. 1 Validitas Item Dimensi Refocus on Planning Mean if if Item reg14,3 3,14,42,81 reg17,43 3,291,5,55 reg19,94 3,321,42,9 reg3,43 3,573,5,37 1. 5. 2 Reliabilitas Dimensi Refocus on Planning of Items,75 4 1. Validitas Item dan Reliabilitas Dimensi Positive Reappraisal 1.. 1 Validitas Item Dimensi Positive Reappraisal Mean if if Item reg5,32 4,558,,8 reg,39 4,7,18,7 reg22,5 4,371,577,72 reg24,1 5,7,47,754 1.. 2 Reliabilitas Dimensi Positive Reappraisal of Items,73 4
1. 7 Validitas Item dan Reliabilitas Dimensi Putting into Perspective 1. 7. 1 Validitas Item Dimensi Putting into Perspective Mean if if Item reg1 8,92 3,514,393,45 reg2 8, 3,878,3,53 reg33 9,29 3,9,33,532 reg34 9,7 4,2,4,457 1. 7. 2 Reliabilitas Dimensi Putting into Perspective of Items,5 4 1. 8 Validitas Item dan Reliabilitas Dimensi Catastrophizing 1. 8. 1 Validitas Item Dimensi Catastrophizing Mean if if Item reg9 7,49 4,338,481,54 reg21 7,58 4,359,393,2 reg29 7,8 4,5,525,531 reg31 7,57 4,8,37,38 1. 8. 2 Reliabilitas Dimensi Catastrophizing of Items,59 4
1. 9 Validitas Item dan Reliabilitas Dimensi Blaming Others 1. 9. 1 Validitas Item Dimensi Blaming Others Mean if if Item reg7 7,3 3,48,14,578 reg18,9 3,28,2,548 reg27 7,7 3,277,475, reg35 7,19 4,131,282,77 1. 9. 2 Reliabilitas Dimensi Blaming Others of Items,79 4
LAMPIRA 2 HASIL UJI VALIDITAS DA RELIABILITAS DRS-SHORT FORM 2. 1 Validitas Item dan Reliabilitas DRS-short form 2. 1. 1 Validitas DRS-short form Mean if if Item hard1 2,417 11,83,282,2 hard2 2,5 9,829,481,2 hard5 2,3333 9,972,371,45 hard 19,528,52,431,43 hard8 2,1944,384,342,51 hard9 2,5278,45,39,44 hard13 2,3333,282,34,5 hard 2,2917,717,372,49 hard4n 2,2778,2,237,75 hard11n 21,1111,35,25,78 hard14n 21,,3,247,71 2. 1. 2 Reliabilitas DRS-short form of Items,75 11
LAMPIRA 3 DATA DESKRIPTIF PARTISIPA kategusia Cumulative Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 2-25 2 2,8 2,8 2,8 2-3 19 2,4 2,4 29,2 31-35 25 34,7 34,7 3,9 3-4 2 3,1 3,1, Total 72,, kategpkrjan Valid pegawai negeri pegawai swasta Total Cumulative Percent Valid Percent Percent 3 5, 5, 5, 3 5, 5,, 72,, Valid 1-5 tahun - tahun 11- tahun 1 tahun keatas Total kateglamakrj Cumulative Percent Valid Percent Percent 2 27,8 27,8 27,8 24 33,3 33,3 1,1 14 19,4 19,4 8, 14 19,4 19,4, 72,, Valid 1-5 tahun - tahun 11- tahun 1 tahun keatas Total kategusiapnikahan Cumulative Percent Valid Percent Percent 2 3,1 3,1 3,1 23 31,9 31,9 8,1 1,7 1,7 84,7 11,3,3, 72,,
Valid pegawai negeri pegawai swasta wiraswasta Total kategpkrjsuami Cumulative Percent Valid Percent Percent 3 41,7 41,7 41,7 3 5, 5, 91,7 8,3 8,3, 72,, kategjmlhanak Cumulative Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 1 35 48, 48, 48, 2 25 34,7 34,7 83,3 3 13,9 13,9 97,2 lebih dari 3 2 2,8 2,8, Total 72,, Mempunyai balita atau tidak Cumulative Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid ya 49 8,1 8,1 8,1 tidak 23 31,9 31,9, Total 72,, pengeluaran Cumulative Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid < 1 juta 1 1,4 1,4 1,4 1-2 juta 21 29,2 29,2 3, 2-3 juta 14 19,4 19,4 5, 3-4 juta 13,9 13,9 3,9 4-5 juta 1 22,2 22,2 8,1 diatas 5 juta 13,9 13,9, Total 72,,
LAMPIRA 4 GAMBARA UMUM STRATEGI REGULASI EMOSI SECARA KOGITIF DA HARDIESS PARTISIPA 4. 1 Gambaran Umum Strategi Regulasi Emosi Secara Kognitif Partisipan Statistics Mean Median Std. Deviation Range Minimum Maximum Valid Missing self_blameacceptancerumination positive_ refocusing refocusing_ on_planning positive_ reappraisal putting_into_ catastrop perspective hizing blaming_ others 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 11,25 11,81 9,35 14,22 1,72 1,4 11,9,17 9,42,, 9, 14, 17, 1,5,,, 2,1 2,243 2,3 3,234 2,33 2,813 2,44 2,48 2,39 9 11 13 9 11 13 11 5 4 5 7 11 9 5 4 4 14 2 2 2 18 1 4. 2 Gambaran Umum Hardiness Partisipan Statistics hardiness Valid 72 Missing Mean 22,39 Median 23, Std. Deviation 3,495 Range 2 Minimum 13 Maximum 33
LAMPIRA 5 HASIL UJI ORMALITAS PEYEBARA SKOR DIMESI REGULASI EMOSI SECARA KOGITIF DA SKOR HARDIESS PARTISIPA 5. 1 Uji ormalitas Penyebaran Skor Dimensi Regulasi Emosi Secara Kognitif Tests of ormality Kolmogorov-Smirnov(a) Statistic df Sig. self_blame,18 72, acceptance,132 72,3 rumination, 72, positive_refocusing,3 72,57 refocusing_on_planning,13 72,4 positive_reappraisal,5 72,7 putting_into_perspective,118 72,14 catastrophizing,114 72,22 blaming_others,194 72, self_blame 2 5 4 8 14 1 Mean = 11.25 Std. Dev. = 2.1 = 72 self_blame
acceptance 9 3 2 4 8 acceptance 14 1 Mean = 11.81 Std. Dev. = 2.243 = 72 rumination 2 5 4 8 14 1 Mean = 9.35 Std. Dev. = 2.3 = 72 rumination
positive_refocusing 14 8 4 2 9 18 21 Mean = 14.22 Std. Dev. = 3.234 = 72 positive_refocusing refocusing_on_planning 14 8 4 2 14 1 18 refocusing_on_planning 2 22 Mean = 1.72 Std. Dev. = 2.33 = 72
positive_reappraisal 14 8 4 2 8 14 1 18 2 22 Mean = 1.4 Std. Dev. = 2.813 = 72 positive_reappraisal putting_into_perspective 9 3 5 2 Mean = 11.9 Std. Dev. = 2.44 = 72 putting_into_perspective
catastrophizing 9 3 2.5 5 7.5.5 17.5 Mean =.17 Std. Dev. = 2.48 = 72 catastrophizing blaming_others 2 5 2 4 8 14 1 Mean = 9.42 Std. Dev. = 2.39 = 72 blaming_others
5. 2 Uji ormalitas Penyebaran Skor Hardiness Tests of ormality Kolmogorov-Smirnov(a) Statistic df Sig. hardiness,3 72,9 Histogram 2 5 2 hardiness 25 3 35 Mean = 22.39 Std. Dev. = 3.495 = 72
LAMPIRA HASIL PEGHITUGA KORELASI ATARA DIMESI REGULASI EMOSI SECARA KOGITIF DEGA HARDIESS s hardiness self_blame acceptance rumination Spearman's rho hardiness Coefficie self_blame Coefficie acceptance Coefficie rumination Coefficie positive_refocusing Coefficie refocusing_on_plannin Coefficie positive_reappraisal Coefficie putting_into_perspectiv Coefficie catastrophizing Coefficie blaming_others Coefficie *. is significant at the.5 level (2-tailed). **. is significant at the.1 level (2-tailed). positive_ refocusing refocusing_ on_planning positive_ reappraisal putting_into_ perspective catastrop hizing blaming_ others 1,,21,74 -,132,8,111,24*,54 -,252*,17.,82,538,271,35,353,37,55,32,888,21 1,,221,228,21,85,77,18,397**,143,82.,3,54,9,48,521,119,1,232,74,221 1, -,21,2,298*,57**,27 -,1 -,133,538,3.,83,74,11,,82,27,24 -,132,228 -,21 1, -,52,88 -,42,284*,443** -,39,271,54,83.,5,4,727,1,,745,8,21,2 -,52 1,,331**,2,343**,193,2,35,9,74,5.,4,82,3,5,74,111,85,298*,88,331** 1,,472**,19,,13,353,48,11,4,4.,,111,3,91,24*,77,57** -,42,2,472** 1,,299* -,189 -,21,37,521,,727,82,.,11,1,8,54,18,27,284*,343**,19,299* 1,,1 -,7,55,119,82,1,3,111,11.,398,575 -,252*,397** -,1,443**,193, -,189,1 1,,384**,32,1,27,,5,3,1,398.,1,17,143 -,133 -,39,2,13 -,21 -,7,384** 1,,888,232,24,745,74,91,8,575,1.
LAMPIRA 7 HASIL PEGHITUGA PERBEDAA MEA RAK DA MEA ATAR KELOMPOK PADA KATEGORI USIA AAK YAG DIMILIKI 7. 1 Hasil Penghitungan Berdasarkan Mann-Whitney U Test Untuk Kategori Usia Anak yang Dimiliki Test Statistics(a) self_bla me acceptanc e ruminatio n refocus_o n_plannin g positive_re appraisal putting_in to_perspe ctive catastrop hizing blaming_o thers hardiness Mann-Whitney U 541, 395,5 52, 544, 532,5 488, 553,5 45, 557,5 Wilcoxon W 817, 12,5 1787, 179, 1757,5 74, 1778,5 13, 1782,5 Z -,274-2,57 -,18 -,239 -,378 -,919 -,2-1,931 -,74 Asymp. Sig. (2- tailed),784,4,985,811,75,358,93,54,941 a Grouping Variable: balita positive_refocusin 7. 2 Hasil Penghitungan berdasarkan T-Test Untuk Kategori Usia Anak yang Dimiliki Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Sig. Independent Samples Test t df t-test for Equality of Means Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Std. Error Difference Difference Lower Upper,25, -,37 7,52 -,488,7-2, 1,39 -,39 9,914,525 -,488,74-2,11 1,35
LAMPIRA 8 HASIL PEGHITUGA PERBEDAA MEA RAK DA MEA ATAR KELOMPOK PADA KATEGORI JUMLAH AAK YAG DIMILIKI Chi-Square df Asymp. Sig. 8. 1 Hasil Penghitungan Berdasarkan Kruskal-Wallis Test Untuk Kategori Jumlah Anak yang Dimiliki Test Statistics a,b refocusing_ positive_ putting_into_ catastrop blaming_ hardiness self_blame acceptance rumination on_planning reappraisal perspective hizing others,2,927 1,957,728 3,9,745 2,899,7 8,224 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3,97,819,581,87,299,82,47,995,42 a. Kruskal Wallis Test b. Grouping Variable: kategjmlhanak 8. 2 Hasil Penghitungan Berdasarkan Anova Untuk Kategori Jumlah Anak yang Dimiliki positive_refocusing AOVA Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 42,299 3 14, 1,39,2 Within Groups 7,14 8,29 Total 742,444 71