ASEAN UNIVERSITY NETWORK (AUN)

Ukuran: px

Mulai penontonan dengan halaman:

Download "ASEAN UNIVERSITY NETWORK (AUN)"

Budi Sanjaya
6 tahun lalu
Tontonan:

1 ASEAN UNIVERSITY NETWORK (AUN) J.P. GENTUR SUTAPA KANTOR JAMINAN MUTU UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA 0 STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT MATURE EFFORT ORGANIZED EFFORT INFORMAL EFFORT NO EFFORT

2 AUN THINK BIG START SMALL DEVELOPING ASSESMENT INDICATORS STRATEGIC PLAN(S) QUALITY ASSURANCE PATHS WHICH REPRESENT THE STRATEGIC PLAN OPTIONS Desired End Point Position GAP Current Position TIME /0/0 J.P GENTUR SUTAPA

3 QUALITY. QUALITY OF IQA SYSTEM. QUALITY OF PROGRAMM AU N Q u a lity A s s u r ance: Development (I). (Source : Nantana, 0)

4 AU N Q u a lity A s s u r ance: Development (II). (Source : Nantana, 0) Currently, undergraduate programmes were assessed by AUN Assessors IMPLEMENTATION OF Q A DEVELOPMENT MODELS AUN-QA Models Strategic (QA at Institutional Level) Systemic (Internal QA System) Tactical (QA at Programme Level)

5 EVALUASI DIRI 5

=document available and evidence that they are used 5=clear evidence on the

6 GRADING = NOTHING, no ducument, no plans, no evidence present = THIS SUBJECT is in planning stage = document available but no clear evidence that they are used =document available and evidence that they are used 5=clear evidence on the efficiency of the aspects 6= example of good practices 7= Word class / excellent 6

7 AUN QA CRITERIA FOR INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE. POLICY AND PROCEDURE OF IQA. MONITORING SYSTEM. PERIODIC RIEVEW OF THE CORE ACTIVITIES. Q A OF THE STUDENT ASSESMENT 5. QA OF THE STAFF 6. QA OF THE FACILITIES 7. QA OF THE STUDENT SUPPORT 8. SELF ASSESMENT 9. INTERNAL AUDIT 0. INFORMATION SYSTEM. PUBLIC INFORMATION. QUALITY HANDBOOK Assesment of the quality of a programm = absolutely inadequate, immediete improvement must be made = inadequate, improvement necessery = in adequate, bu will minor improvement will make it adequate = adequate as expected 5= better than adequate 6= example of good practices 7= Word class / excellent 7

Source: Johnson, NUS 0 SAR FOR PROGRAMM LEVEL Part : Introduction Content page Executive summary Organisation of the self-assessment Brief description of the university, faculty and department Part :

8 Source: Johnson, NUS 0 SAR FOR PROGRAMM LEVEL Part : Introduction Content page Executive summary Organisation of the self-assessment Brief description of the university, faculty and department Part : AUN-QA Criteria Requirements Write-up on how the university, faculty or department addresses the requirements of the AUN-QA criteria (use checklist as a reference) Part : Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis Summary of strengths Summary of Weaknesses Completed checklist Improvement plan Part : Appendices Glossary Supporting documents and evidences 8

9 AUN-QA criterias for programme level. Expected learning outcomes. Programme specification. Programme structure and content. Teaching and learning strategy 5. Student assessment 6. Academic staff quality 7. Support staff quality 8. Student quality 9. Student advice and support 0. Facilities and infrastructure. Quality assurance of teaching and learning process. Staff development activities. Stakeholders feedback. Output 5. Stakeholders satisfaction AUN-QA Criterion Checklist Programme Structure and Content. The programme content shows a good balance between generic and specialised skills and Knowledge. The programme reflects the vision and mission of the university. The contribution made by each course to achieving the learning outcomes is clear. The programme is coherent and all subjects and courses have been integrated.5 The programme shows breadth and depth.6 The programme clearly shows the basic courses, intermediate courses, specialised courses and the final project, thesis or dissertation.7 The programme content is up-to-date 9

10 Analysis of Programme Assessment By Zhou Qi, et al., 0 (NUS) Diagnostic questions - Do the contents reflect the mission and vision of the university? - Do the contents of the undergraduate programme reflect the expected outcomes and can they be considered capable of achieving the expected outcomes? - Are the courses in the programme clearly related? Is the programme coherent? - Has a proper balance been struck between specific and general courses? - Is the programme content up-to-date? 0

11 - Why was this programme structure chosen? - Has the educational programme been changed structurally over recent years? If so, why? - Do the courses demonstrate growing complexity over the years? - Were any requirements specified on the internal coherence of the courses? Who set these requirements? - Does the first year of the programme provide sufficient insight into the remaining parts of the programme? - Is the connection between basic programme and specialisation correct? - Is the organisation of the various specialised courses satisfactory? - Is the relation between basic courses, intermediate courses and specialised courses in the compulsory programme and the optional sections satisfactory? - Are bottlenecks experienced within the programme? - What organisational form does the university use (term, semester, modular, problem oriented)? What do those involved think of this?

12 PRAKTEK KEIZEN. MENGANALISIS SETIAP BAGIAN PROSES SAMPAI DETAIL. BAGAIMANA SETIAP BAGIAN PROSES DAPAT DITINGKATKAN. MELIHAT BAGAIMANA KARYAWAN, PERALATAN, DAN BAHAN DAPAT DITINGKATKAN. MELIHAT CARA MENGHEMAT WAKTU DAN MENGURANGI LIMBAH /0/0 J.P GENTUR SUTAPA TAHAPAN PEMBENTUKAN BUDAYA MUTU Tahap I Tahap II Tahap III Dorongan Eksternal Dorongan Eksternal Dorongan Eksternal Motivasi Internal Internally Driven Motivasi Internal Internally Driven Motivasi Internal Internally Driven Ing Ngarso Sung Tulodho Ing Madya Mangun Karso Tut Wuri Handayani

13 7 Prinsip yang berkaitan dengan sikap. Memperhatikan proses secara rinci. Melihat kemungkinan pengembangan kedepan. Menerima kritikan-nasehat dari siapapun. Bersedia mengambil tanggung jawab 5. Bangga dengan institusi pekerjaannya 6. Bersedia kerjasama 7. Selalu mencari pemecahan baru dan menjadi lebih baik /0/0 J.P GENTUR SUTAPA 5 MODEL KINERJA PROGRAM STUDI / IDEAL PPM Lulusan Visi, Misi SDM Sistem Jaminan Mutu Kurikulum Sistem Informasi Suasana Akademik Pengelolaan Program Data Terkait dengan : 0 Proses 9 Pembelajaran 7 8 Tata Pamong 6 Pendanaan. Level PP 9/005 ttg SNP. Level melampaui PP 9/005. Level ASEAN. Level Internasional Kemahasiswaan 5 Sarana Prasarana

14 Sistem Jaminan Mutu MODEL KINERJA PROGRAM STUDI () REALITA Lulusan PPM Visi, Misi SDM Kurikulum Sistem Informasi Suasana Akademik Pengelolaan 0 Program Data Terkait dengan : Proses 9 Pembelajaran 7 8 Tata Pamong 6 Pendanaan. Level PP 9/005 ttg SNP. Level melampaui PP 9/005. Level ASEAN. Level Internasional Kemahasiswaan 5 Sarana Prasarana Sistem Jaminan Mutu MODEL KINERJA PROGRAM STUDI REALITA SECARA GRAFIS Lulusan PPM Visi, Misi SDM Kurikulum Sistem Informasi Suasana Akademik Pengelolaan 0 Program Data Terkait dengan : Proses 9 Pembelajaran 7 8 Tata Pamong 6 Pendanaan. Level PP 9/005 ttg SNP. Level melampaui PP 9/005. Level ASEAN. Level Internasional Kemahasiswaan 5 Sarana Prasarana

MODEL KINERJA PROGRAM STUDI () KONDISI OPTIMAL (BULAN PURNAMA} Lulusan PPM Visi, Misi Sistem Jaminan Mutu SDM Kurikulum Sistem Informasi Suasana Akademik Pengelolaan Program Data Terkait

15 MODEL KINERJA PROGRAM STUDI () KONDISI OPTIMAL (BULAN PURNAMA} Lulusan PPM Visi, Misi Sistem Jaminan Mutu SDM Kurikulum Sistem Informasi Suasana Akademik Pengelolaan Program Data Terkait dengan : 0 Proses 9 Pembelajaran 7 8 Tata Pamong 6 Pendanaan. Level PP 9/005 ttg SNP. Level melampaui PP 9/005. Level ASEAN. Level Internasional Kemahasiswaan 5 Sarana Prasarana KRISTALISASI 5

16 /0/0 J.P GENTUR SUTAPA /0/0 J.P GENTUR SUTAPA 6

17 TERIMAKASIH Atas segala perhatian dan kesabarannya J.P. GENTUR SUTAPA /0/0 J.P GENTUR SUTAPA 7

dokumen-dokumen yang mirip

LAMPIRAN 2-ESTIMASI DAFTAR PERTANYAAN WAWANCARA DALAM ASESMEN ASEAN UNIVERSITY NETWORK (AUN) PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN DOKTER FKUI 2-4 Desember 2014

LAMPIRAN 2-ESTIMASI DAFTAR PERTANYAAN WAWANCARA DALAM ASESMEN ASEAN UNIVERSITY NETWORK (AUN) PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN DOKTER FKUI 2-4 Desember 2014 LAMPIRAN -ESTIMASI DAFTAR PERTANYAAN WAWANCARA DALAM ASESMEN ASEAN UNIVERSITY NETWORK (AUN) PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN DOKTER FKUI - Desember 0 pengajar I Kriteria - Expected Learning Outcomes (ELO) Bagaimana