DAFTAR PUSTAKA.

Transkripsi

1 DAFTAR PUSTAKA Bachkar, Khalid; Won, Koo and Szmerekovsky, Joseph An Analytical Hierarchy Process framework to Mitigate the Security Risk in the Global Container Supply Chain. The Journal of Management and Engineering Integration Vol. 6, No. 1 Bai, Xuije Credibility-Based Biobjective Fuzzy Optimization for Supplier Selection Problem with Disruption. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 2015 Bello, Marlene J. Suarez A Case Study Approach to The Supplier Selection Process. didownload tanggal 11 Mei Fatmawati, Medelina Shinta Penggunaan Metode AHP dalam Mengukur Kualitas Jasa Lembaga Amil Zakat di Surakarta. Skripsi Sarjana Yang Tidak Dipublikasikan. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta. Haque, Mahbubul; Syahriyar, Ahmed A Conceptual Framework of Supplier Selection and Order Allocation: an Integrated of AHP and LP Modeling. Journal of Global Business Issues; Fall 2014; 8,2; ABI/INFORM research pg.1 Heizer, Jay dan Barry Render Manajemen Operasi. Edisi Ketujuh. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Hu, Lei AHP Method for Supplier Evaluation Index System Modeling and Evaluation Research. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols (2012) pp Jha, Goutam Kumar Supplier in Manufacturing Environment Using Range of Value Method i-manager s Journal on Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 3. No.3 - July 2013 Jin, Hui Suppliers Selection of Auto Parts Enterprise Based on Fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications(JDCTA).Volume7,Number3,February 2013 Kaur, Prabjot Selection of Vendor Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analitycal. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Operations Research Volume 2014, Article ID , 10 pages

2 Li, Lisha Research on Airline Operational Control Model Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols (2014) pp Ning, Zhang Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method for civil aviation airport security information management. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols (2015) pp Nydick, Robert L and Ronal Paul Hill Using the Analitic Hierarchy Process to Structure the Supplier Selection Procedure. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 28 (2) Ryan Taufik, Yeni Sumantri Penerapan Pemilihan Supplier Bahan Baku Readymix Berdasarkan Integrasi Metode AHP dan Topsis. Didownload tanggal 10 Februari Saaty, Thomas L Multi Criteria Decision Methode : The Analitycal Hierarchy Process. University of Pittsburgh. Sachdey, Haras J The Challenges of Obtaining a Competitive Advantage for Processed Material Suppliers: A Conceptual Study. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness vol. 7(1) 2013 Sekaran, Uma Research Methods For Business: Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis.Salemba Empat: Jakarta. Stock, James. R And Douglas Lambert Strategic Logistic Management. 4 th Edition. New York : McGraw-Hill. Subakti, Irfan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November. Surabaya. Sugiyono Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Edisi Revisi. Bandung : Alfabeta. Supriyono, Wisnu Arya Wardana, dan Sudaryo Sistem Pemilihan Pejabat Struktural dengan Metode AHP. Seminar Nasional III. STTN-BATAN. pdf didownload tanggal 12 November Surjasa, Dadang, Pudji Astuti, dan Hario Nugroho. Usulan Supplier Selection Dengan Analytical Hierarchy Process Dan Penerapan Sistem Informasi Dengan konsep Vendor Managed Inventory Pada PT ABC. didownload tanggal 12 November Tahriri, Farzad, dkk A Review of Supplier Selection Methods In Manufacturing Industries. Suranaree J. Sci. Technol. Vol. 15 No. 3; July - September 2008.

3 Teknomo, Kardi Analytic Hierarchy Process (On-Line). Available : tutoria/ahp/ Universitas Sebelas Maret Buku Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi. Surakarta : Fakultas Ekonomi UNS. Watjatrakul, Boonlert Vendor selection strtegy for IT outsourcing: the weigthed-criteria evaluation technique. Journal of Entreprise Information Management Vo. 27 No. 2, 2014 pp Weber, Charles A., John R. Current and W.C. Benton Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods. European Journal of Operations Research 50 (1991) Zhu, Shi Sheng An Improved AHP Model Applied in Supply Chain Management. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols (2011) pp

4 Lampiran 1. REKAP HASIL KUISIONER KRITERIA SUPPLIER Kriteria Harga Vs Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan Pengiriman Kriteria Kualitas Vs Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot Harga Layanan Ketepatan Pengiriman Kriteria Layanan Vs Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot Harga Kualitas Ketepatan Pengiriman Kriteria Pengiriman Vs Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot Harga Kualitas Layanan

5 Lampiran 2. NORMALISASI MATRIK DAN PRIORITAS KRITERIA BOBOT PENILAIAN KRITERIA Kriteria Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan Pengiriman Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan Pengiriman Jumlah NORMALISASI BOBOT PENILAIAN KRITERIA Kriteria Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan Pengiriman Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan Pengiriman RATA-RATA PENILAIAN KRITERIA Kriteria Rata-rata Prioritas Harga II Kualitas I Layanan IV Ketepatan Pengiriman III

6 Lampiran 3. REKAP HASIL KUISIONER SUBKRITERIA SUPPLIER Kriteria Harga Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot H1 vs H H2 vs H Kriteria Kualitas Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot K1 vs K K1 vsk K2 vs K K2 vs K K3 vs K K3 vs K Kriteria Layanan Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot L1 vs L L1 vs L L2 vs L L2 vs L L3 vs L L3 vs L Kriteria Ketepatan Pengiriman Jumlah Responden Total Responden Rata-rata Responden Total Bobot Rata-rata Bobot D1 vs D D2 vs D

7 Lampiran 4. NORMALISASI MATRIK DAN PRIORITAS SUBKRITERIA BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA HARGA Kriteria H1 H2 H H Jumlah NORMALISASI BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA HARGA Kriteria H1 H2 H H RATA-RATA PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA HARGA Kriteria Rata-rata Prioritas H I H II BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA LAYANAN Kriteria L1 L2 L3 L L L Jumlah NORMALISASI BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA LAYANAN Kriteria L1 L2 L3 L L L RATA-RATA PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA LAYANAN Kriteria Rata Prioritas L III L II L I BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA KUALITAS Kriteria K1 K2 K3 K K K Jumlah NORMALISASI BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA KUALITAS Kriteria K1 K2 K3 K K K RATA-RATA PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA KUALITAS Kriteria Rata Prioritas K I K II K III BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA PENGIRIMAN Kriteria D1 D2 D D Jumlah BOBOT PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA PENGIRIMAN Kriteria H1 H2 D D RATA-RATA PENILAIAN SUBKRITERIA PENGIRIMAN Kriteria Rata-rata Prioritas D I D II

8 CR Value = OK Pairwise comparisons Item Number Item Number Kriteria Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan pengiriman 1 Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan pengiriman Sum STANDARDIZED MATRIX Lampiran 5. CONSISTENSI RATIO KRITERIA Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan pengiriman Weight 1 Harga % 2 Kualitas % 3 Layanan % 4 Ketepatan pengiriman % CI and CR worksheet Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan pengiriman SUM SUM/Weig 1 Harga Kualitas Layanan Ketepatan pengiriman count 4.00 lambda max CI CR constant 0.9

9 Lampiran 6. CONSISTENSI RATIO SUBKRITERIA HARGA CR Value = OK Pairwise comparisons Item Number Item Number Kriteria H1 H2 1 H H Sum STANDARDIZED MATRIX H1 H2 Weight 1 H % 2 H % 3 CI and CR worksheet H1 H2 SUM SUM/Weight 1 H H count 2.00 lambda max CI CR 0.00 constant 0

10 Lampiran 7. CONSISTENSI RATIO SUBKRITERIA KUALITAS CR Value = OK Pairwise comparisons Item Number Item Number Kriteria K1 K2 K3 1 K K K Sum STANDARDIZED MATRIX K1 K2 K3 Weight 1 K % 2 K % 3 K % CI and CR worksheet K1 K2 K3 SUM SUM/Weight 1 K K K count 3.00 lambda max CI CR constant 0.58

11 Lampiran 8. CONSISTENSI RATIO SUBKRITERIA LAYANAN CR Value = OK Pairwise comparisons Item Number Item Number Kriteria L1 L2 L3 1 L L L Sum STANDARDIZED MATRIX L1 L2 L3 Weight 1 L % 2 L % 3 L % CI and CR worksheet L1 L2 L3 SUM SUM/Weight 1 L L L count 3.00 lambda max CI CR constant 0.58

12 CR Value = OK Pairwise comparisons Lampiran 9. CONSISTENSI RATIO SUBKRITERIA KETEPATAN PENGIRIMAN Item Number Item Number Kriteria D1 D2 1 D D Sum STANDARDIZED MATRIX D1 D2 Weight 1 D % 2 D % 3 CI and CR worksheet D1 D2 SUM SUM/Weig 1 D D count 2.00 lambda max CI CR 0.00 constant 0