Lampiran 1 : FORMAT UJI ORGANOLEPTIK SKALA HEDONIK

Lampiran 1 : FORMAT UJI ORGANOLEPTIK SKALA HEDONIK Nama Panelis :... Umur :... Pekerjaan :... Alamat :...... Tanggal :... Produk : Cookies Petunjuk Pengisian Ujilah sampel dibawah ini dengan baik sesuai dengan nomor kode sampel, dan nyatakanlah pendapat Anda tentang apa yang dirasakan oleh alat indera. Kemudian beri skala kode dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut : Untuk uji organoleptik rasa memakai skala hedonik : Sangat enak : 5 Cukup enak : 3 Enak : 4 Kurang enak : 2 Tidak Enak : 1 Untuk uji organoleptik warna memakai skala hedonik : Sangat suka : 5 Cukup suka : 3 Suka : 4 Kurang suka : 2 Tidak suka : 1 Untuk uji organoleptik aroma memakai skala hedonik : Sangat harum : 5 Cukup harum : 3 Harum : 4 Kurang harum : 2 103

104 Tidak harum : 1 Untuk uji organoleptik tekstur atau kerenyahan memakai skala hedonik : Sangat renyah : 5 Cukup renyah : 3 Renyah : 4 Kurang renyah : 2 Tidak renyah : 1 Berilah skala kode pada tabel dibawah ini sesuai kode sampel yang Anda konsumsi dengan baik : Kode Sampel C1 Uji Organoleptik Rasa Aroma Warna Tekstur C2 C3 C4 Panelis,..

103 LAMPIRAN 2 TABEL : REKAPITULASI HASIL ANALISIS UJI HEDONIK COOKIES N O Nama Panelis Umur L/P UJI ORGANOLEPTIK (UJI HEDONIK) Warna Aroma Rasa Tekstur C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3 C4 REMAJA ( 13 20 tahun ) 1. Dwi 18 P 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 2. Kevin 18 L 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3. Andri 15 L 4 5 4 3 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 3 4 4 4 4 4. Intan 19 P 3 4 3 3 4 5 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 5. Michael 19 L 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 6. Nuraini 15 P 5 4 4 3 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 7. Weni 15 P 4 4 3 3 4 5 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 8. Ferdi 18 L 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 9. Rian 16 L 4 5 4 2 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 10. Glenn 18 L 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 11. Taufik 19 L 5 4 4 3 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 12. Yanriko 19 L 4 4 3 3 4 5 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 4 3 4 13. Wenty 18 P 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 14. Yohana 18 P 4 4 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 15. Intan 15 P 2 4 4 3 4 5 2 4 3 5 2 2 4 4 4 4 DEWASA ( 21 45 tahun ) 16. Dian 23 L 3 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 5 2 1 4 4 4 4 17. Trisna 22 P 2 4 4 3 4 5 3 4 3 5 2 1 4 4 4 3 18. Yantie 35 P 4 4 3 3 4 5 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 19. Putri 21 P 5 4 4 3 4 5 2 4 3 5 2 2 4 4 4 4

104 20. Melisa 22 P 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 5 4 4 21. Herwita 40 P 5 4 3 3 4 5 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 22. Indra 41 L 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 23. Rikardo 21 L 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 5 4 4 24. Budi 22 L 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 2 2 4 4 4 4 25. William 22 L 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 5 3 2 4 4 4 4 26. Bella 21 P 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 5 4 4 27. Marini 22 P 4 4 4 3 4 5 3 4 3 5 2 2 4 4 4 4 28. Resa 22 P 4 4 4 3 4 5 3 4 3 5 2 3 4 4 4 3 29. Tina P. 47 P 4 4 3 3 4 5 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 30. Zulfan 45 L 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 5 2 2 4 4 4 4 X i 120 126 113 102 121 137 110 114 115 145 102 85 126 124 121 120 4.00 4.20 3.77 3.40 4.03 4.57 3.67 3.80 3.83 4.83 3.40 2.83 4.20 4.13 4.03 4.00

105 LAMPIRAN 3 General Linear Model Indikator Warna Descriptive Statistics Std. Deviation Warna C1 4.00.743 30 Warna C2 4.20.407 30 Warna C3 3.77.504 30 WarnaC4 3.40.621 30 N Multivariate Tests b Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. warna Pillai's Trace.613 14.263 a 3.000 27.000.000 Wilks' Lambda.387 14.263 a 3.000 27.000.000 Hotelling's Trace 1.585 14.263 a 3.000 27.000.000 Roy's Largest Root a. Exact statistic b. Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: warna 1.585 14.263 a 3.000 27.000.000 Source Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Type III Sum of Squares df Square F Sig. warna Sphericity Assumed 10.625 3 3.542 11.573.000 Error (warna) Greenhouse-Geisser 10.625 2.416 4.398 11.573.000 Huynh-Feldt 10.625 2.651 4.008 11.573.000 Lower-bound 10.625 1.000 10.625 11.573.002 Sphericity Assumed 26.625 87.306 Greenhouse-Geisser 26.625 70.062.380 Huynh-Feldt 26.625 76.883.346 Lower-bound 26.625 29.000.918

106 Source warna Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts Type III Sum of Squares df Square F Sig. warna Linear 7.482 1 7.482 17.978.000 Quadratic 2.408 1 2.408 6.753.015 Cubic.735 1.735 5.057.032 Error(warna) Linear 12.068 29.416 Quadratic 10.342 29.357 Cubic 4.215 29.145 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Transformed Variable:Average Source Type III Sum of Squares Df Square F Sig. Intercept 1771.008 1 1771.008 4030.810.000 Error 12.742 29.439 Estimated Marginal s warna Estimates 95% Confidence Interval Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 4.000.136 3.723 4.277 2 4.200.074 4.048 4.352 3 3.767.092 3.578 3.955 4 3.400.113 3.168 3.632

107 (I) warna (J) warna Difference (I-J) Pairwise Comparisons a 95% Confidence Interval for Difference a Std. Error Sig. a Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 2 -.200.155.206 -.516.116 3.233.164.165 -.102.569 4.600 *.170.001.252.948 2 1.200.155.206 -.116.516 3.433 *.092.000.245.622 4.800 *.130.000.533 1.067 3 1 -.233.164.165 -.569.102 2 -.433 *.092.000 -.622 -.245 4.367 *.131.009.098.635 4 1 -.600 *.170.001 -.948 -.252 2 -.800 *.130.000-1.067 -.533 3 -.367 *.131.009 -.635 -.098 Based on estimated marginal means a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments). *. The mean difference is significant at the.05 level. Multivariate Tests Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Pillai's trace.613 14.263 a 3.000 27.000.000 Wilks' lambda.387 14.263 a 3.000 27.000.000 Hotelling's trace 1.585 14.263 a 3.000 27.000.000 Roy's largest root 1.585 14.263 a 3.000 27.000.000 Each F tests the multivariate effect of warna. These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means. a. Exact statistic

108 LAMPIRAN 4 Descriptive Statistics Std. Deviation Aroma C1 4.03.556 30 Aroma C2 4.70.651 30 Aroma C3 3.67.606 30 Aroma C4 3.80.664 30 N Multivariate Tests b Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. aroma Pillai's Trace.728 24.047 a 3.000 27.000.000 Wilks' Lambda.272 24.047 a 3.000 27.000.000 Hotelling's Trace 2.672 24.047 a 3.000 27.000.000 Roy's Largest 2.672 24.047 a 3.000 27.000.000 Root a. Exact statistic b. Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: aroma Source Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Type III Sum of Squares df Square F Sig. aroma Sphericity Assumed 18.967 3 6.322 18.945.000 Greenhouse-Geisser 18.967 2.038 9.306 18.945.000 Huynh-Feldt 18.967 2.194 8.647 18.945.000 Lower-bound 18.967 1.000 18.967 18.945.000 Error(aroma) Sphericity Assumed 29.033 87.334 Greenhouse-Geisser 29.033 59.103.491 Huynh-Feldt 29.033 63.612.456 Lower-bound 29.033 29.000 1.001

109 Source aroma Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts Type III Sum of Squares df Square F Sig. aroma Linear 4.507 1 4.507 20.127.000 Quadratic 2.133 1 2.133 7.864.009 Cubic 12.327 1 12.327 24.362.000 Error(aroma) Linear 6.493 29.224 Quadratic 7.867 29.271 Cubic 14.673 29.506 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Transformed Variable:Average Source Type III Sum of Squares Df Square F Sig. Intercept 1968.300 1 1968.300 3635.713.000 Error 15.700 29.541 Estimates aroma 95% Confidence Interval Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 4.033.102 3.826 4.241 2 4.700.119 4.457 4.943 3 3.667.111 3.440 3.893 4 3.800.121 3.552 4.048 (I) aroma (J) aroma Pairwise Comparisons a 95% Confidence Interval for Difference a Difference (I- J) Std. Error Sig. a Lower Bound Upper Bound

110 1 2 -.667 *.088.000 -.846 -.488 3.367 *.148.019.065.669 4.233.124.070 -.020.487 2 1.667 *.088.000.488.846 3 1.033 *.182.000.660 1.407 4.900 *.130.000.634 1.166 3 1 -.367 *.148.019 -.669 -.065 2-1.033 *.182.000-1.407 -.660 4 -.133.196.502 -.534.268 4 1 -.233.124.070 -.487.020 2 -.900 *.130.000-1.166 -.634 3.133.196.502 -.268.534 Based on estimated marginal means *. The mean difference is significant at the.05 level. a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments). Multivariate Tests Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Pillai's trace.728 24.047 a 3.000 27.000.000 Wilks' lambda.272 24.047 a 3.000 27.000.000 Hotelling's trace 2.672 24.047 a 3.000 27.000.000 Roy's largest root 2.672 24.047 a 3.000 27.000.000 Each F tests the multivariate effect of aroma. These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means. a. Exact statistic

111 LAMPIRAN 5 Descriptive Statistics Std. Deviation Rasa C1 3.83.747 30 Rasa C2 4.73.583 30 Rasa C3 3.40 1.070 30 Rasa C4 2.83.791 30 N Multivariate Tests b Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. rasa Pillai's Trace.867 58.662 a 3.000 27.000.000 Wilks' Lambda.133 58.662 a 3.000 27.000.000 Hotelling's Trace 6.518 58.662 a 3.000 27.000.000 Roy's Largest Root a. Exact statistic b. Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: rasa 6.518 58.662 a 3.000 27.000.000 Source Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Type III Sum of Squares Df Square F Sig. Rasa Sphericity Assumed 57.800 3 19.267 41.697.000 Greenhouse-Geisser 57.800 1.844 31.338 41.697.000 Huynh-Feldt 57.800 1.964 29.430 41.697.000 Lower-bound 57.800 1.000 57.800 41.697.000 Error(rasa) Sphericity Assumed 40.200 87.462 Greenhouse-Geisser 40.200 53.488.752 Huynh-Feldt 40.200 56.955.706 Lower-bound 40.200 29.000 1.386 Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts

112 Source rasa Type III Sum of Squares df Square F Sig. Rasa Linear 28.167 1 28.167 63.649.000 Quadratic 16.133 1 16.133 121.000.000 Cubic 13.500 1 13.500 16.660.000 Error(rasa) Linear 12.833 29.443 Quadratic 3.867 29.133 Cubic 23.500 29.810 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Transformed Variable:Average Source Type III Sum of Squares Df Square F Sig. Intercept 1642.800 1 1642.800 1280.677.000 Error 37.200 29 1.283 Estimates rasa 95% Confidence Interval Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 3.833.136 3.555 4.112 2 4.733.106 4.516 4.951 3 3.400.195 3.000 3.800 4 2.833.145 2.538 3.129 (I) rasa (J) rasa Pairwise Comparisons a 95% Confidence Interval for Difference a Difference (I- J) Std. Error Sig. a Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 2 -.900 *.182.000-1.271 -.529 3.433 *.141.005.144.722 4 1.000 *.152.000.690 1.310

113 2 1.900 *.182.000.529 1.271 3 1.333 *.246.000.830 1.837 4 1.900 *.188.000 1.516 2.284 3 1 -.433 *.141.005 -.722 -.144 2-1.333 *.246.000-1.837 -.830 4.567 *.114.000.333.800 4 1-1.000 *.152.000-1.310 -.690 2-1.900 *.188.000-2.284-1.516 3 -.567 *.114.000 -.800 -.333 Based on estimated marginal means *. The mean difference is significant at the.05 level. a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments).

115 LAMPIRAN 6 Descriptive Statistics Std. Deviation Tekstur C1 4.10.481 30 Tekstur C2 4.03.414 30 Tekstur C3 3.93.254 30 Tekstur C4 3.90.305 30 N Multivariate Tests b Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. tekstur Pillai's Trace.185 2.039 a 3.000 27.000.132 Wilks' Lambda.815 2.039 a 3.000 27.000.132 Hotelling's Trace.227 2.039 a 3.000 27.000.132 Roy's Largest Root.227 2.039 a 3.000 27.000.132 a. Exact statistic b. Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: tekstur Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Source Type III Sum of Squares df Square F Sig. tekstur Sphericity Assumed.758 3.253 2.590.058 Greenhouse-Geisser.758 2.599.292 2.590.067 Huynh-Feldt.758 2.878.264 2.590.061 Lower-bound.758 1.000.758 2.590.118 Error(tekstur) Sphericity Assumed 8.492 87.098 Greenhouse-Geisser 8.492 75.379.113 Huynh-Feldt 8.492 83.459.102

116 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Source Type III Sum of Squares df Square F Sig. tekstur Sphericity Assumed.758 3.253 2.590.058 Greenhouse-Geisser.758 2.599.292 2.590.067 Huynh-Feldt.758 2.878.264 2.590.061 Lower-bound.758 1.000.758 2.590.118 Error(tekstur) Sphericity Assumed 8.492 87.098 Greenhouse-Geisser 8.492 75.379.113 Huynh-Feldt 8.492 83.459.102 Lower-bound 8.492 29.000.293 Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts Source tekstur Type III Sum of Squares df Square F Sig. Tekstur Linear.735 1.735 6.242.018 Quadratic.008 1.008.088.769 Cubic.015 1.015.186.669 Error(tekstur) Linear 3.415 29.118 Quadratic 2.742 29.095 Cubic 2.335 29.081 Transformed Variable:Average Source Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Type III Sum of Squares df Square F Sig. Intercept 1912.008 1 1912.008 7162.313.000 Error 7.742 29.267

117 Estimated Marginal s tekstur Estimates tekstur 95% Confidence Interval Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 4.100.088 3.921 4.279 2 4.033.076 3.879 4.188 3 3.933.046 3.839 4.028 4 3.900.056 3.786 4.014 (I) (J) tekstur tekstur Pairwise Comparisons a 95% Confidence Interval for Difference a Difference (I- J) Std. Error Sig. a Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 2.067.095.489 -.128.261 3.167.084.057 -.006.339 4.200 *.088.031.019.381 2 1 -.067.095.489 -.261.128 3.100.074.184 -.050.250 4.133.079.103 -.029.295 3 1 -.167.084.057 -.339.006 2 -.100.074.184 -.250.050 4.033.058.573 -.086.153 4 1 -.200 *.088.031 -.381 -.019 2 -.133.079.103 -.295.029 3 -.033.058.573 -.153.086 Based on estimated marginal means a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments). *. The mean difference is significant at the.05 level.

118 LAMPIRAN 7 DOKUMENTASI PENELITIAN Gambar : Tanaman Bunga Tasbih (Canna edulis Ker.) 7 bulan usia tanam. Gambar : Rimpang Bunga Tasbih (Canna edulis Ker.) setelah pencucian.

119 Gambar : Daging Ikan Patin (Pangansius hypopthalmus). Gambar : Lembaran Rimpang Bunga Tasbih Pada Proses Pengeringan.

120 Gambar : Lembaran Kering Rimpang Bunga Tasbih Setelah Pengeringan. Gambar : Bentukan Padatan Kering Daging Ikan Patin (Pangansius hypopthalmus) Sebelum Penepungan.

121 LAMPIRAN 8 PERHITUNGAN NILAI GIZI COOKIES Berpedoman pada pendapat Tarwotjo (1998), kira-kira satu kali makan jajan, seseorang cukup 1-2 potong yang mengandung 150-200 kalori. Cookies C2 yang merupakan cookies ideal dengan tingkat kesukaan terbaik dapat diketahui sumbangan energi cookies didasarkan pada Tabel 4.8 berikut: Tabel 4.8. Hasil Uji Proksimat Tepung Rimpang Bunga Tasbih (Canna edulis Ker.) dan Cookies Parameter Sampel Satuan Karbohidrat Protein Lemak Serat Abu Air Kasar Tepung %(b/b) 75,3 3,61 0,15 3,62 - - Cookies 1 %(b/b) 54,3 13,4 24,3 5,49 4,6 3,4 Cookies 2 %(b/b) 54,8 14,1 24,5 4,34 3,4 3,2 Sumber: BARISTAN, 2016. Berat cookies = 5 gr/keping gr.ha = 5 gr x 54,8% = 2,74 gr; gr.lipid = 5 gr x 24,5% = 1,225 gr; gr.protein = 5 gr x 14,1% = 0,705 gr. Nilai Energi = (4 kkal x gr.ha) + (9 kkal x gr.lipid) + (4 kkal x gr.protein) Nilai Energi = (4 kkal x 2,74) + (9 kkal x 1,225) + (4 kkal x 0,705) = 10,96 kkal + 11,025 kkal + 2,82 kkal = 24,805 kkal = 25 kkal per keping Asupan serat WHO : 19 30 gr/orang/hari. Serat cookies = 5 gram x 4,34% = 0,217 gram per keping. Asupan cookies normal mengarah pada pemenuhan 150-200 kkal maka banyak keping cookies yang dikonsumsi = 8 keping cookies.

122 LAMPIRAN 9 T-Test Paired Samples Statistics N Std. Deviation Std. Error Pair 1 Cookies 1 24.3725 4 21.39007 10.69503 Cookies 2 24.4350 4 21.85298 10.92649 Pair 2 Cookies 2 24.4350 4 21.85298 10.92649 Cookies 1 24.3725 4 21.39007 10.69503 Paired Samples Correlations N Correlation Sig. Pair 1 Cookies 1 & Cookies 2 4.999.001 Pair 2 Cookies 2 & Cookies 1 4.999.001 Paired Samples Test Paired Differences Std. Deviation Std. Error Pair 1 Cookies 1 - Cookies 2 -.06250.83404.41702 Pair 2 Cookies 2 - Cookies 1.06250.83404.41702 Paired Samples Test Paired Differences 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed) Pair 1 Cookies 1 - Cookies 2-1.38965 1.26465 -.150 3.890 Pair 2 Cookies 2 - Cookies 1-1.26465 1.38965.150 3.890

123

124

125

126

127

128

129