TABEL PENENTUAN JUMLAH SAMPEL ISAAC DAN MICHAEL UNTUK TINGKAT KESALAHAN 1%, 5%, DAN 10% LAMPIRAN 1. s N S N 1% 5% 10%

dokumen-dokumen yang mirip
LAMPIRAN 1 TABEL PENENTUAN JUMLAH SAMPEL ISAAC DAN MICHAEL UNTUK TINGKAT KESALAHAN 1%, 5%, DAN 10%

Reliability. Scale: ALL VARIABLES. Case Processing Summary N %

LAMPIRAN A SKALA IKLIM ORGANISASI DAN KEPUASAN KERJA SETELAH UJI COBA

LAMPIRAN A SKALA KEMATANGAN EMOSI DAN PENYESUAIAN AKADEMIK

Uji Normalitas. NPar Tests. One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. Item N 233. Normal Parameters a,,b Mean Std. Deviation 8.

LAMPIRAN KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN

Lampiran 1 : Kuesioner. Ponorogo, Januari : Permohonan Pengisian Kuesioner. Kepada Yth. Bapak/Ibu/Saudara/i. di Tempat

LAMPIRAN A SKALA SELF EFFICACY DAN ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SETELAH UJI COBA

KUESIONER PENELITIAN ANALISIS PENGARUH SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA, PRASARANA DAN LINGKUNGAN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI KOPERTIS WILAYAH I MEDAN

LAMPIRAN A SKALA KUALITAS PELAYANAN SEBELUM DAN SETELAH DI UJI COBA

ANGKET PENELITIAN DI PT SEMEN GRESIK (PERSERO) tbk.

Variabel Pelayanan Purna Jual

ANGKET UJI COBA PENELITIAN MINAT SISWA KELAS V SD GUGUS 2 KECAMATAN GALUR TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN PERMAINAN BOLA VOLI. Nama :... Kelas :...

LAMPIRAN A SKALA WORK ENGAGEMENT DOSEN TETAP DAN TIDAK TETAP

KUESIONER PENGARUH STRES KERJA TERHADAP MOTIVASI KERJA DAN KINERJA KARYAWAN PT. BANK SYARIAH MANDIRI CABANG GAJAH MADA MEDAN

Lampiran 1 DAFTAR KUESIONER. Petunjuk Pengisian

KUESIONER PENELITIAN. Terhadap Pengembangan Karir Individu pada PT. PRUDENTIAL, Jalan Adam Malik. 2. Jenis Kelamin : Laki - laki Wanita.


SURAT PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN UNTUK IKUT SERTA DALAM PENELITIAN (INFORMED CONSENT)


LAMPIRAN A KUESIONER PENELITIAN

LAMPIRAN 1 KUESIONER PENELITIAN. Pertanyaan di bawah ini hanya semata-mata digunakan untuk data

LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN MENJADI RESPONDEN PENELITIAN. dengan judul Prevalensi Buta Warna Pada Siswa/Siswi SMU di Kecamatan

PEDOMAN PENGAMATAN PERAWAT HUBUNGAN PELAKSANAAN EDUKASI PERAWAT TERHADAP TINGKAT NYERI PASIEN PASCA TINDAKAN NASOLARINGOSCOPY

PENGANTAR. Hormat Saya, (Suprapti Ningsih)

KUESIONER KUESIONER RESPONDEN. Bapak / Ibu / Saudara / i yang saya hormati,

LAMPIRAN 1. Surat Keterangan Ijin Penelitian

DATA LAMPIRAN LAMPIRAN A SKALA SELF EFFICACY

KUESIONER PENELITIAN. kuesioner penelitian dengan judul Hubungan Pembagian Kerja dan. Pendelegasian Wewenang Karyawan Dengan Prestasi Kerja


LAMPIRAN A SKALA DUKUNGAN SOSIAL DAN PENERIMAAN DIRI PENDERITA LUPUS SEBELUM UJI COBA

KUESIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN PENGELOLAAN KEARSIPAN DENGAN PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN DI KANTOR DINAS PENDIDIKAN dan KEBUDAYAAN KABUPATEN TAPANULI UTARA

KUESIONER PENELITIAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI SUAMI SEBAGAI AKSEPTOR KB MEDIS OPERASI PRIA (MOP) DI KECAMATAN SITINJO KABUPATEN DAIRI

DAFTAR KUESIONER. Pernyataan yang ada dalam rangka penyusunan skripsi ini hanya semata-mata

PENGARUH PEMBERIAN KOMPENSASI TERHADAP PRESTASI KERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT TELKOMSEL MEDAN

Reliability Scale: Reliability Analysis

LAMPIRAN A SKALA KONFORMITAS DAN PERILAKU KONSUMTIF

LAMPIRAN 1: Uji Daya Beda Aitem dan Realibilitas

LAMPIRAN Jawaban yang Anda berikan akan kami jaga dan dijamin kerahasiaannya 6. Terimakasih atas perhatian dan kerjasama Anda.

dan Bisnis Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta penelitian yang berjudul : PENGARUH KUALITAS MAKANAN, KUALITAS PELAYANAN DAN PERSEPSI HARGA TERHADAP

LAMPIRAN PENELITIAN Hubungan Antara..., Jelita Widuri Wati, FPSI UI, 2008

LAMPIRAN A SKALA STRES DAN REGULASI DIRI

1. Berapa usia anda saat ini :. Tahun. 2. Jenis Kelamin : Laki laki Perempuan. Lain lain sebutkan

LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN MENJADI RESPONDEN ( Informed Concent)

LAMPIRAN A KUESIONER PENELITIAN

KUESIONER A HUBUNGAN MOTIVASI KERJA DENGAN KEPUASAN KERJA. PERAWAT DI RSUD. dr H YULIDDIN AWAY TAPAKTUAN KABUPATEN ACEH SELATAN

PASIEN RAWAT INAP DI RUMAH SAKIT SINT CAROLUS JAKARTA. Mohon bantuan dan kerjasamanya. Terimakasih.

LAMPIRAN 1 ANGKET FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENYEBAB PROKRASTINASI AKADEMIK SEBELUM UJI COBA

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

KUESIONER PENELITIAN PENGARUH IKLIM KELOMPOK KERJA DENGAN TINGKAT PENJUALAN PADA DIVISI PEMASARAN PT.ISS INDONESIA CABANG MEDAN

PENJELASAN TENTANG PENELITIAN

Lembar Persetujuan Menjadi Responden Penelitian

Skala Kontrol Diri. No. Pernyataan SS S TS STS. 1. Ketika saya sangat marah, saya akan bertindak hati-hati

SURAT PERSETUJUAN MENJADI RESPONDEN PENELITIAN

KUESIONER PENELITIAN Pengaruh Desain Pekerjaan Terhadap Semangat Kerja pada Kantor Regional VI Badan Kepegawaian Negara Medan

PENGARUH KUALITAS PRODUK, KEUNIKAN PRODUK DAN HARGA TERHADAP KEPUASAN KONSUMEN PADA CV. LESTARI INDAH JEPARA

DAFTAR PERTANYAAN PENELITIAN (KUESIONER)

Sabun Madu Mutiara (80 gram) Harga Sabun untuk kesehatan kulit dengan pewangi alami

Analisis Harapan dan Persepsi Anggota Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Pada Koperasi Kredit (Credit Union) Mandiri Tebing Tinggi

HUBUNGAN PERAWATAN PERINEUM TERHADAP KESEMBUHAN LUKA PERINEUM DI KLINIK BIDAN HARYANTARI TAHUN 2014 Waktu

KUESIONER TINGKAT KEPUASAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP KUALITAS PELAYANAN KEFARMASIAN DI APOTEK DI KOTA MEDAN

KUESIONER PENELITIAN PENGARUH PELATIHAN DAN SUPERVISI TERHADAP KINERJA PERAWAT PELAKSANA DI RUANG RAWAT INAP RSUD Dr. H. YULUDDIN AWAY TAPAKTUAN

Keterangan: Berilah tanda Cek List ( ) pada kolom data responden yang sesuai dengan data saat ini berdasarkan pilihan jawaban yang tersedia!

ANALISIS PENGARUH KUALITAS PRODUK, KUALITAS LAYANAN, DAN KREATIFITAS PERIKLANAN TERHADAP PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN KONSUMEN

Lampiran 1 Petunjuk Pengisisan Angket ANGKET. Nama :... Umur :... Kelas :... Jenis kelamin :...

KUESIONER PENELITIAN PENGARUH DISIPLIN KERJA DAN IMBALAN TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT. SANOBAR GUNAJAYA MEDAN

KUISIONER PENELITIAN

KUISIONER. Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Kasus Pada Rumah Makan Joglo Manis Ponorogo).

LAMPIRAN A. Skala Penelitian A-1 SKALA PENELITIAN CINDERELLA COMPLEX A-2 SKALA PENELITIAN POLA ASUH OTORITER

Lampiran 1. Informed Consent SURAT PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN MENGIKUTI PENELITIAN (INFORMED CONSENT)

Lampiran 1 Kuesioner Dukungan Sosisal Suami. SKALA DUKUNGAN SOSIAL SUAMI Identitas Nama : Umur : Jenis Kelamin : Pekerjaan : Alamat :

Stroke Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Haji Adam Malik Medan.

LAMPIRAN A RELIABILITAS TRY OUT SKALA SEMANGAT KERJA

Studi Identifikasi Faktor Penentu Keputusan Nasabah Dalam Memilih Jasa Perbankan di Kota Tarutung

Kuisioner Jawablah pertanyaan dibawah ini dengan tanda X! Keterangan : Pertanyaan Kesetiaan Merek

LAMPIRAN A Skala Dukungan Sosial Sesudah Uji Coba

1. Nama / NIM :. KUESIONER

KUESIONER PENELITIAN. Bersama ini saya memohon kesediaan Ibu untuk membantu saya dalam pengisian dan


KUESIONER. Nama : Usia : Anggaran khusus untuk membeli sepatu : >Rp ,- / < Rp ,-

Lampiran : 1 (satu) set kuesioner Medan, April 2011 : Permohonan Menjadi Responden Penelitian

KUESIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN PENGETAHUAN PERAWAT TENTANG ALAT PELINDUNG DIRI (APD) DAN KEPATUHAN PERAWAT

Alpha. Item-Total Statistics Scale Variance if Item Deleted

LAMPIRAN 1 SKALA KEMATANGAN KARIR

Lampiran I : KUESIONER PENELITIAN SEBELUM UJI VALIDITAS

LAMPIRAN A UJI NORMALITAS, LINEARITAS DAN DAYA BEDA ITEM

Tingkat Partisipasi Ibu Hadir Tidak Hadir

KUESIONER PENELITIAN

Lampiran 1. Analisis Data Penelitian

Lampiran 1 KUESIONER PENELITIAN

LAMPIRAN. Konstruk Alat Tes Kuesioner Ketahanan Emosional

Perpustakaan Unika LAMPIRAN

KUESIONER PENELITIAN. Perilaku Caring Perawat dalam Melakukan Asuhan Keperawatan pada. Pasien di Ruang Rawat Inap RSUD Dr. Tengku Mansyur Tanjungbalai

DAFTAR PERTANYAAN. Partisipan yang terhormat,

Lampiran I. Skala Uji Coba Kecemasan Akademik. Universitas Sumatera Utara

I I I I I BEL PERTAMA: ORGANISASI ABEL KEDUA :PESAN / CITRA ABEL KETIGA : KONSTITUEN ABEL KEEMPAT : FEEDBACK KONSTITUEN

JADWAL TENTATIF PENELITIAN

KUESIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN MOTIVASI DAN KEPUASAN KERJA DENGAN PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN PADA HOTEL DANAU TOBA INTERNASIONAL MEDAN

Daftar Pustaka. Assael, Henry Pelanggan Behavior and Marketing Action 6th Edition. New

LAMPIRAN 1 KUESIONER

Transkripsi:

77 LAMPIRAN 1 TABEL PENENTUAN JUMLAH SAMPEL ISAAC DAN MICHAEL UNTUK TINGKAT KESALAHAN 1%, 5%, DAN 10% N s N S N S 1% 5% 10% 1% 5% 10% 1% 5% 10% 10 10 10 10 280 197 155 138 2800 537 310 247 15 15 14 14 290 202 158 140 3000 543 312 248 20 19 19 19 300 207 161 143 3500 558 317 251 25 24 23 23 320 216 167 147 4000 569 320 254 30 29 28 27 340 225 172 151 4500 578 323 255 35 33 32 31 360 234 177 155 5000 586 326 257 40 38 36 35 380 242 182 158 6000 598 329 259 45 42 40 39 400 250 186 162 7000 606 332 261 50 47 44 42 420 257 191 165 8000 613 334 263 55 51 48 46 440 265 195 168 9000 618 335 263 60 55 51 49 460 272 198 171 10000 622 336 263 65 59 55 53 480 279 202 173 15000 635 340 266 70 63 58 56 500 285 205 176 20000 642 342 267 75 67 62 59 550 301 213 182 30000 649 344 268

78 80 85 90 95 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 71 75 79 83 81 94 102 109 116 122 129 235 142 148 154 160 165 171 176 182 65 68 72 75 78 84 89 95 100 105 110 114 119 123 127 131 135 139 142 146 62 65 68 71 73 78 83 88 92 97 101 105 108 112 115 118 122 125 127 130 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2200 315 329 341 352 363 373 382 391 399 414 427 440 450 460 469 477 485 492 498 510 221 227 233 238 243 247 251 255 258 265 270 275 279 283 286 289 292 294 297 301 187 191 195 199 202 205 208 211 213 217 221 224 227 229 232 234 235 237 238 241 40000 50000 75000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 450000 500000 550000 600000 650000 700000 750000 800000 850000 900000 563 655 658 659 661 661 662 662 662 662 663 663 663 663 663 663 663 663 663 663 345 346 346 347 347 347 348 348 348 348 348 348 348 348 348 348 348 348 348 348 269 269 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 271 271 271

260 187 149 133 2400 520 304 270 192 152 135 2600 529 307 Sumber: tabel Isaac dan Michael Lampiran 2 Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 111 97.4 Excluded( a) 3 2.6 Total 114 100.0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. 243 245 950000 1000000 663 663 663 348 348 349 271 271 272 79

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha Based on Standardized Items N of Items.946.946 216 Summary Item Statistics Mean Minimum Maximum Range Maximum / Minimum Variance N of Items Inter-Item Correlations.076 -.373.786 1.159-2.110.014 216 Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 305.20 689.815 26.264 216 80

Lampiran 3 Frequencies Statistics Minat N Valid 114 Missing 0 Minat Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid realistic 2 1.8 1.8 1.8 investigative 5 4.4 4.4 6.1 artistic 11 9.6 9.6 15.8 social 76 66.7 66.7 82.5 enterprising 7 6.1 6.1 88.6 conventional 13 11.4 11.4 100.0 Total 114 100.0 100.0 81

Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Minat * Hobi 114 100.0% 0.0% 114 100.0% 82

83 Hobi Total Social Count 32 7 9 2 0 3 6 6 5 4 0 1 1 76 Expected Count 30.0 8.0 8.7 2.7.7 2.7 5.3 6.7 4.0 4.7.7.7 1.3 76.0 % within Minat menata ruang memperbaiki alat-alat mekanik berdagang diskusi jalanjalan membaca 42.1% menggambar 9.2% 11.8% 2.6%.0% 3.9% 7.9% men den gar musi 7.9 % olahrag a menulis masak 13 membaca k menonton 6.6% 5.3%.0% 1.3% 1.3% 100.0% Minat Realistic Count 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 % within Hobi 71.1% 58.3% 69.2% 50.0%.0% 75.0% 75.0% 60.0 83.3% 57.1%.0% 100.0% 50.0% 66.7% Expected Count.8.2.2.1.0.1.1.2 %.1.1.0.0.0 2.0 enterprisi ng % within of Total Minat.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 5.3 28.1% 6.1% 7.9% 1.8%.0% 2.6% 5.3% 50.0% 4.4% 50.0% 3.5%.0%.0%.9%.0%.9% 100.0% 66.7% % % within Hobi.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 16.7% 14.3%.0%.0%.0% 1.8% Count 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 % of Total.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.9%.9%.0%.0%.0% 1.8% investigati ve conventio nal Count Expected Count 2.8.7.8.2.1.2.5.6.4.4.1.1.1 7.0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 % within Minat 42.9% 14.3%.0% 14.3% 14.3%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 14.3% 100.0% Expected Count 2.0.5.6.2.0.2.4.4.3.3.0.0.1 5.0 % within Hobi 6.7% 8.3%.0% 25.0% 100.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 50.0% 6.1% % within Minat 40.0%.0% 20.0%.0%.0% 20.0% 20.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% % of Total 2.6%.9%.0%.9%.9%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.9% 6.1% % within Hobi 4.4%.0% 7.7%.0%.0% 25.0% 12.5%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 4.4% Count 5 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 13 % of Total 1.8%.0%.9%.0%.0%.9%.9%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 4.4% Artistic Count Expected Count 5.1 3 1.4 4 1.5 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.9 1 1.1 3.7 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 13.0 11 Expected % within Minat Count 4.3 1.2 1.3.4.1.4.8 1.0 7.7.6.7.1.1.2 11.0 38.5%.0% 23.1% 7.7%.0%.0%.0%.0% 15.4% 7.7%.0%.0% 100.0% % % within Minat 27.3% 36.4%.0%.0%.0%.0% 9.1% 27.3.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% % within Hobi % 11.1%.0% 23.1% 25.0%.0%.0%.0% 10.0.0% 28.6% 100.0%.0%.0% 11.4% % % within Hobi 6.7% 33.3%.0%.0%.0%.0% 12.5% 30.0.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 9.6% % of Total 4.4%.0% 2.6%.9%.0%.0%.0%.9% %.0% 1.8%.9%.0%.0% 11.4% Total % Count of Total 45 12 13 4 1 4 8 2.6 10 6 7 1 1 2 114 2.6% 3.5%.0%.0%.0%.0%.9%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 9.6% % Expected Count 45.0 12.0 13.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 8.0 10.0 6.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 114.0

% within Minat 39.5% 10.5% 11.4% 3.5%.9% 3.5% 7.0% % within Hobi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 % % of Total 39.5% 10.5% 11.4% 3.5%.9% 3.5% 7.0% Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Minat * JK 114 100.0% 0.0% 114 100.0% 8.8 % 100. 0% 8.8 % 84 5.3% 6.1%.9%.9% 1.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5.3% 6.1%.9%.9% 1.8% 100.0%

Minat * JK Crosstabulation JK Total laki-laki perempuan laki-laki Minat realistic Count 2 0 2 Expected Count.5 1.5 2.0 % within Minat 100.0%.0% 100.0% % within JK 7.7%.0% 1.8% % of Total 1.8%.0% 1.8% investigative Count 1 4 5 Expected Count 1.1 3.9 5.0 % within Minat 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within JK 3.8% 4.5% 4.4% % of Total.9% 3.5% 4.4% artistic Count 2 9 11 Expected Count 2.5 8.5 11.0 % within Minat 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% % within JK 7.7% 10.2% 9.6% % of Total 1.8% 7.9% 9.6% 85

Total social enterprising conventional Count 15 61 76 Expected Count 17.3 58.7 76.0 % within Minat 19.7% 80.3% 100.0% % within JK 57.7% 69.3% 66.7% % of Total 13.2% 53.5% 66.7% Count 4 3 7 Expected Count 1.6 5.4 7.0 % within Minat 57.1% 42.9% 100.0% % within JK 15.4% 3.4% 6.1% % of Total 3.5% 2.6% 6.1% Count 2 11 13 Expected Count 3.0 10.0 13.0 % within Minat 15.4% 84.6% 100.0% % within JK 7.7% 12.5% 11.4% % of Total 1.8% 9.6% 11.4% Count 26 88 114 Expected Count 26.0 88.0 114.0 % within Minat 22.8% 77.2% 100.0% % within JK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 86

investi gative inat realisti c % of Total 22.8% 77.2% 100.0% Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Minat * Suku 114 100.0% 0.0% 114 100.0% Minat * Suku Crosstabulation % within Suku 2.6% 5.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 1.8% % of Total.9%.9%.0%.0%.0% Suku.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% Total 1.8% Count jawa sunda cina dayak batak betawi manado arab bugis palembang 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 Count 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Expected 1.7.9.7.1.3 1.1.1.0.1.0 5.0 Count Expected.7.4.3.1.1.4.0.0.0.0 2.0 Count % within Minat 40.0% 20.0% 20.0%.0%.0% 20.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% % within Minat Suku 50.0% 5.3% 50.0% 5.0% 6.3%.0%.0%.0% 4.2%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% 4.4% 87

% Expected of Total 1.8%.9%.9%.0%.0%.9%.0%.0%.0%.0% 4.4% 4.3 2.3 1.8.3.8 2.7.2.1.2.1 13.0 Count artistic Count 2 0 3 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 11 % within Minat 30.8% 23.1% 30.8% Cases.0%.0% 15.4%.0%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% Expected 3.7 1.9 1.5.3.7 2.3.2.1.2.1 11.0 Count % within Suku 10.5% 15.0% 25.0%.0%.0% 8.3%.0%.0%.0%.0% 11.4% Valid Missing Total % of within Total Minat 18.2% 3.5% 2.6%.0% 27.3% 3.5% 9.1%.0% 9.1%.0% 36.4% 1.8%.0%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% 11.4% N Percent N Percent N Percent otal % Count within Suku 5.3% 38.0% 20 18.8% 16 33.3% 3 14.3% 7 16.7% 24.0% 2.0% 1.0% 2.0% 1 9.6% 114 Minat * PA 114 100.0% 0.0% 114 100.0% % Expected of Total 1.8%.0% 2.6%.9%.9% 3.5%.0%.0%.0%.0% 9.6% 38.0 20.0 16.0 3.0 7.0 24.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 114.0 Count social Count 27 13 7 2 5 16 2 1 2 1 76 % within Minat 33.3% 17.5% 14.0% 2.6% 6.1% 21.1% 1.8%.9% 1.8%.9% 100.0% Expected 25.3 13.3 10.7 2.0 4.7 16.0 1.3.7 1.3.7 76.0 Count % within Suku 100.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % % within Minat 35.5% 17.1% 9.2% 2.6% 6.6% 21.1% 2.6% 1.3% 2.6% 1.3% 100.0% % of Total 33.3% 17.5% 14.0% 2.6% 6.1% 21.1% 1.8%.9% 1.8%.9% 100.0% % within Suku 71.1% 65.0% 43.8% 66.7% 71.4% 66.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% % of Total 23.7% 11.4% 6.1% 1.8% 4.4% 14.0% 1.8%.9% 1.8%.9% 66.7% enterp rising Count 2 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 7 Expected Count 2.3 1.2 1.0.2.4 1.5.1.1.1.1 7.0 % within Minat 28.6% 28.6% 14.3%.0% 14.3% 14.3%.0%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% % within Suku 5.3% 10.0% 6.3%.0% 14.3% 4.2%.0%.0%.0%.0% 6.1% % of Total 1.8% 1.8%.9%.0%.9%.9%.0%.0%.0%.0% 6.1% conve ntional Count 4 3 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 13 88

Minat PA Total psikolog wirausaha TNI guru karyawan pelaut desain interior psikolog realistic Count 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 Expected Count.1.9.1.1.8.0.0 2.0 % within Minat.0%.0%.0%.0% 100.0%.0%.0% 100.0% % within PA.0%.0%.0%.0% 4.3%.0%.0% 1.8% % of Total.0%.0%.0%.0% 1.8%.0%.0% 1.8% investigative Count 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 5 Expected Count.1 2.3.2.3 2.0.1.0 5.0 % within Minat.0% 40.0%.0% 20.0% 40.0%.0%.0% 100.0% % within PA.0% 3.8%.0% 16.7% 4.3%.0%.0% 4.4% % of Total.0% 1.8%.0%.9% 1.8%.0%.0% 4.4% artistic Count 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 11 Expected Count.3 5.0.4.6 4.4.2.1 11.0 % within Minat.0% 45.5%.0%.0% 54.5%.0%.0% 100.0% % within PA.0% 9.6%.0%.0% 13.0%.0%.0% 9.6% % of Total.0% 4.4%.0%.0% 5.3%.0%.0% 9.6% social Count 2 34 3 5 29 2 1 76 89

Total enterprising conventional Expected Count 2.0 34.7 2.7 4.0 30.7 1.3.7 76.0 % within Minat 2.6% 44.7% 3.9% 6.6% 38.2% 2.6% 1.3% 100.0% % within PA 66.7% 65.4% 75.0% 83.3% 63.0% 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% % of Total 1.8% 29.8% 2.6% 4.4% 25.4% 1.8%.9% 66.7% Count 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 7 Expected Count.2 3.2.2.4 2.8.1.1 7.0 % within Minat 14.3% 57.1%.0%.0% 28.6%.0%.0% 100.0% % within PA 33.3% 7.7%.0%.0% 4.3%.0%.0% 6.1% % of Total.9% 3.5%.0%.0% 1.8%.0%.0% 6.1% Count 0 7 1 0 5 0 0 13 Expected Count.3 5.9.5.7 5.2.2.1 13.0 % within Minat.0% 53.8% 7.7%.0% 38.5%.0%.0% 100.0% % within PA.0% 13.5% 25.0%.0% 10.9%.0%.0% 11.4% % of Total.0% 6.1%.9%.0% 4.4%.0%.0% 11.4% Count 3 52 4 6 46 2 1 114 Expected Count 3.0 52.0 4.0 6.0 46.0 2.0 1.0 114.0 % within Minat 2.6% 45.6% 3.5% 5.3% 40.4% 1.8%.9% 100.0% % within PA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 2.6% 45.6% 3.5% 5.3% 40.4% 1.8%.9% 100.0% 90

Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Minat * UL 114 100.0% 0.0% 114 100.0% Minat * UL Crosstabulation UL Total tunggal sulung tengah bungsu tunggal Minat realistic Count 0 1 0 1 2 Expected Count.2.7.5.7 2.0 % within Minat.0% 50.0%.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within UL.0% 2.6%.0% 2.6% 1.8% % of Total.0%.9%.0%.9% 1.8% investigative Count 0 1 3 1 5 91

artistic social enterprising Expected Count.4 1.7 1.1 1.7 5.0 % within Minat.0% 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 100.0% % within UL.0% 2.6% 11.5% 2.6% 4.4% % of Total.0%.9% 2.6%.9% 4.4% Count 0 5 3 3 11 Expected Count 1.0 3.8 2.5 3.8 11.0 % within Minat.0% 45.5% 27.3% 27.3% 100.0% % within UL.0% 12.8% 11.5% 7.7% 9.6% % of Total.0% 4.4% 2.6% 2.6% 9.6% Count 9 26 15 26 76 Expected Count 6.7 26.0 17.3 26.0 76.0 % within Minat 11.8% 34.2% 19.7% 34.2% 100.0% % within UL 90.0% 66.7% 57.7% 66.7% 66.7% % of Total 7.9% 22.8% 13.2% 22.8% 66.7% Count 0 3 1 3 7 Expected Count.6 2.4 1.6 2.4 7.0 % within Minat.0% 42.9% 14.3% 42.9% 100.0% % within UL.0% 7.7% 3.8% 7.7% 6.1% % of Total.0% 2.6%.9% 2.6% 6.1% 92

conventional Count 1 3 4 5 13 Expected Count 1.1 4.4 3.0 4.4 13.0 % within Minat 7.7% 23.1% 30.8% 38.5% 100.0% % within UL 10.0% 7.7% 15.4% 12.8% 11.4% % of Total.9% 2.6% 3.5% 4.4% 11.4% Total Count 10 39 26 39 114 Expected Count 10.0 39.0 26.0 39.0 114.0 % within Minat 8.8% 34.2% 22.8% 34.2% 100.0% % within UL 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 8.8% 34.2% 22.8% 34.2% 100.0% Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Minat * PD 114 100.0% 0.0% 114 100.0% 93

Minat realistic investigative artistic Minat * PD Crosstabulation PD Total psikolog seniman wirausaha guru staff pengacara psikolog Count 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 Expected Count 1.6.1.2.1.0.0 2.0 % within Minat 50.0%.0% 50.0%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% % within PD 1.1%.0% 10.0%.0%.0%.0% 1.8% % of Total.9%.0%.9%.0%.0%.0% 1.8% Count 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 Expected Count 4.1.2.4.2.0.0 5.0 % within Minat 100.0%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% % within PD 5.4%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 4.4% % of Total 4.4%.0%.0%.0%.0%.0% 4.4% Count 9 1 1 0 0 0 11 Expected Count 9.0.4 1.0.5.1.1 11.0 % within Minat 81.8% 9.1% 9.1%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% % within PD 9.7% 25.0% 10.0%.0%.0%.0% 9.6% % of Total 7.9%.9%.9%.0%.0%.0% 9.6% 94

Total social enterprising conventional Count 62 3 5 5 1 0 76 Expected Count 62.0 2.7 6.7 3.3.7.7 76.0 % within Minat 81.6% 3.9% 6.6% 6.6% 1.3%.0% 100.0% % within PD 66.7% 75.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0%.0% 66.7% % of Total 54.4% 2.6% 4.4% 4.4%.9%.0% 66.7% Count 4 0 2 0 0 1 7 Expected Count 5.7.2.6.3.1.1 7.0 % within Minat 57.1%.0% 28.6%.0%.0% 14.3% 100.0% % within PD 4.3%.0% 20.0%.0%.0% 100.0% 6.1% % of Total 3.5%.0% 1.8%.0%.0%.9% 6.1% Count 12 0 1 0 0 0 13 Expected Count 10.6.5 1.1.6.1.1 13.0 % within Minat 92.3%.0% 7.7%.0%.0%.0% 100.0% % within PD 12.9%.0% 10.0%.0%.0%.0% 11.4% % of Total 10.5%.0%.9%.0%.0%.0% 11.4% Count 93 4 10 5 1 1 114 Expected Count 93.0 4.0 10.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 114.0 % within Minat 81.6% 3.5% 8.8% 4.4%.9%.9% 100.0% % within PD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95

% of Total 81.6% 3.5% 8.8% 4.4%.9%.9% 100.0% 96

97 LAMPIRAN 4 Dengan hormat, Selamat pagi/ siang/ sore, saya dari Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Esa Unggul akan melakukan penelitian kepada Saudara dengan judul gambaran minat mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonusa Esa Unggul. Kuesioner ini ditujukan untuk kepentingan akademis semata, jadi tidak akan mempengaruhi kehidupan pribadi maupun penilaian terhadap Saudara. Saudara juga tidak perlu merasa khawatir karena hasil dari kuesioner ini dijamin kerahasiaannya. Akhir kata, saya ucapkan terima kasih atas kesediaan Saudara untuk mengisi kuesioner ini. Jakarta, Oktober 2009 Peneliti

98 PETUNJUK: Dalam kuesioner ini terdiri dari 216 pernyataan, terbagi dalam 3 kelompok pernyataan, yaitu: 1. Pernyataan mengenai kegiatan-kegiatan yang dapat dipilih sesuai dengan kesukaan Saudara terdiri dari 66 pernyataan. (aktivitas) 2. Pernyataan mengenai kemampuan-kemampuan yang dapat dipilih sesuai dengan penghayatan kemampuan pribadi terdiri dari 66 pernyataan. (kompetensi) 3. Pernyataan mengenai pekerjaan-pekerjaan yang dapat dipilih sesuai dengan minat Saudara terdiri dari 88 pernyataan. (karir) Setiap item pernyataan terdiri 2 pilihan jawaban, yaitu ya dan tidak. Pilihlah ya jika pernyataan ini sesuai dengan diri anda, pilihlah tidak: jika pernyataan ini tidak sesuai dengan diri anda yaitu dengan cara memberi tanda x (silang) di kolom yang sesuai. Contoh: Pernyataan ya Tidak Bermain music x Jawaban di atas menunjukkan jika Anda senang bermain musik.

Jenis kelamin : L/P * Suku bangsa : Pekerjaan ayah : Psikolog Wirausaha TNI Guru/dosen Dokter Lain-lain, sebutkan Urutan kelahiran : 1/2/3/* dari bersaudara Hobi : Membaca Memperbaiki alat-alat mekanik Menggambar Berdagang Menata ruangan Berdiskusi Lain-lain, sebutkan... Pekerjaan yang ingin ditekuni : Psikolog Lain-lain, sebutkan.. Seniman Wirausaha 99

Guru/dosen TNI *) ket: lingkari jawaban yang sesuai dengan Anda 100