LAMPIRAN 1 KUESIONER PENELITIAN HUBUNGAN PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM K3 DENGAN TERJADINYA KECELAKAAN KERJA PADA PT. CHEVRON PACIFIC INDONESIA DURI TAHUN 20011 DATA UMUM Umur : Pendidikan Terakhir : Masa Kerja : Lokasi Kerja : PETUNJUK PENGISIAN 1. Mohon bantuan dan kesediaan Bapak/Saudara untuk menjawab seluruh pertanyaan yang ada. 2. Beri tanda (X) pada jawaban yang Anda pilih sesuai dengan keadaan sebenarnya. DATA KHUSUS 1. Apakah Anda pernah? a. Ya b. Tidak 2. Jika ya,bagian tubuh mana yang langsung akibat /efek dari kecelakaan yang Anda alami? a. Kepala d. Jari-jari tangan b. Mata e. Kaki c. Pergelangan tangan f. lain-lain,sebutkan 3. Apakah penyebab kecelakaan yang Anda alami? a. Terjatuh d. pengaruh suhu tinggi b. Tertimpa benda jatuh e. Terkena arus listrik c. Terjepit f. lain-lain,sebutkan
LAMPIRAN 2 Hasil Pengolahan Statistik Umur pekerja Valid "20-29" 23 23.7 23.7 23.7 "30-39" 42 43.3 43.3 67.0 "40-49" 29 29.9 29.9 96.9 ">=50" 3 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 97 100.0 100.0 Pendidikan Terakhir Valid SMA 69 71.1 71.1 71.1 SMK 17 17.5 17.5 88.7 STM 7 7.2 7.2 95.9 Diploma 3 3.1 3.1 99.0 Sarjana 1 1.0 1.0 100.0 Total 97 100.0 100.0 Masa Kerja Valid 1-5 56 57.7 57.7 57.7 6-10 24 24.7 24.7 82.5 11-15 8 8.2 8.2 90.7 16-20 5 5.2 5.2 95.9 >20 4 4.1 4.1 100.0 Total 97 100.0 100.0
Pernah Valid Ya 16 16.5 16.5 16.5 Tidak 81 83.5 83.5 100.0 Total 97 100.0 100.0 Jenis Valid First Aid 10 10.3 62.5 62.5 Unsafe behavior 6 6.2 37.5 100.0 Total 16 16.5 100.0 Missing System 81 83.5 Total 97 100.0 Bagian tubuh yang akibat Valid Mata 2 12.5 12.5 12.5 Pergelangan Tangan 3 18.8 18.8 31.2 Jari-jari tangan 7 43.8 43.8 75.0 Kaki 3 18.8 18.8 93.8 Lain-lain 1 6.2 6.2 100.0 Total 16 100.0 100.0
Penyebab Valid Terjatuh 2 12.5 12.5 12.5 Tertimpa benda jatuh 1 6.2 6.2 18.8 Terjepit 5 31.2 31.2 50.0 Lain-lain 8 50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 16 100.0 100.0 Standard Operating Procedure Valid Tidak Baik 9 9.3 9.3 9.3 Baik 88 90.7 90.7 100.0 Total 97 100.0 100.0 Job Safety Analysis1 Valid Baik 88 90,7 90,7 90,7 Tidak Baik 9 9,3 9,3 100,0 Total 97 100,0 100,0 Stop Work Authority Valid Tidak Baik 14 14.4 14.4 14.4 Baik 83 85.6 85.6 100.0 Total 97 100.0 100.0
Alat Pelindung Diri Valid Tidak Baik 13 13.4 13.4 13.4 Baik 84 86.6 86.6 100.0 Total 97 100.0 100.0 Behavioral Based Safety Valid Tidak Baik 11 11.3 11.3 11.3 Baik 86 88.7 88.7 100.0 Total 97 100.0 100.0 Pelatihan K3 Valid Tidak Baik 12 12,4 12,4 12,4 Baik 85 87,6 87,6 100,0 Total 97 100,0 100,0 CROSSTAB Standard Operating Procedure * Pernah Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent 97 100,0% 0,0% 97 100,0%
Standard Operating Procedure * Pernah Crosstabulation Pernah Standard Operating Procedure Ya Tidak Total Tidak Baik Count 10 0 10 Expected Count 1,6 8,4 10,0 Standard Operating Procedure 100,0%,0% 100,0% 62,5%,0% 10,3% % of Total 10,3%,0% 10,3% Baik Count 6 81 87 Expected Count 14,4 72,6 87,0 Standard Operating Procedure 6,9% 93,1% 100,0% 37,5% 100,0% 89,7% % of Total 6,2% 83,5% 89,7% Total Count 16 81 97 Expected Count 16,0 81,0 97,0 Standard Operating Procedure 16,5% 83,5% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% % of Total 16,5% 83,5% 100,0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square 56,444(b) 1,000 Continuity Correction(a) 49,887 1,000 Likelihood Ratio 43,204 1,000 Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Fisher's Exact Test,000,000 Linear-by-Linear Association 55,862 1,000 N of Valid Cases 97 a Computed only for a 2x2 table b 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,65. Case Processing Summary
Job Safety Analysis1 * Pernah Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent 97 100,0% 0,0% 97 100,0% Job Safety Analysis1 Job Safety Analysis1 * Pernah Crosstabulation Pernah Ya Tidak Total Baik Count 7 81 88 Expected Count 14,5 73,5 88,0 Job Safety Analysis1 8,0% 92,0% 100,0% kecelakaan 43,8% 100,0% 90,7% kerja % of Total 7,2% 83,5% 90,7% Tidak Baik Count 9 0 9 Expected Count 1,5 7,5 9,0 Job Safety Analysis1 100,0%,0% 100,0% kecelakaan 56,3%,0% 9,3% kerja % of Total 9,3%,0% 9,3% Total Count 16 81 97 Expected Count 16,0 81,0 97,0 Job Safety Analysis1 16,5% 83,5% 100,0% kecelakaan 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% kerja % of Total 16,5% 83,5% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Pearson Chi-Square 50,222(b) 1,000 Continuity Correction(a) 43,762 1,000 Likelihood Ratio 38,003 1,000 Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Fisher's Exact Test,000,000 N of Valid Cases 97 a Computed only for a 2x2 table b 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,48. Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Stop Work Authority * Pernah 97 100.0% 0.0% 97 100.0% Stop Work Authority * Pernah Crosstabulation Pernah kecelakaan kerja Ya Tidak Total Stop Work Authority Tidak Baik Count 14 0 14 Expected Count 2.3 11.7 14.0 Stop Work Authority 100.0%.0% 100.0% 87.5%.0% 14.4% % of Total 14.4%.0% 14.4% Baik Count 2 81 83 Expected Count 13.7 69.3 83.0 Stop Work Authority 2.4% 97.6% 100.0% 12.5% 100.0% 85.6% % of Total 2.1% 83.5% 85.6%
Total Count 16 81 97 Expected Count 16.0 81.0 97.0 Stop Work Authority 16.5% 83.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 16.5% 83.5% 100.0% Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Alat Pelindung Diri * Pernah 97 100.0% 0.0% 97 100.0% Alat Pelindung Diri * Pernah Crosstabulation Pernah Ya Tidak Total Alat Pelindung Diri Tidak Baik Count 13 0 13 Expected Count 2.1 10.9 13.0 Alat Pelindung Diri 100.0%.0% 100.0% 81.2%.0% 13.4% % of Total 13.4%.0% 13.4% Baik Count 3 81 84 Expected Count 13.9 70.1 84.0 Alat Pelindung Diri 3.6% 96.4% 100.0% % of Total 18.8% 100.0% 86.6% 3.1% 83.5% 86.6%
Total Count 16 81 97 Expected Count 16.0 81.0 97.0 Alat Pelindung Diri 16.5% 83.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 16.5% 83.5% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df Pearson Chi-Square 62.810 a 1.000 Continuity Correction b 56.158 1.000 Likelihood Ratio 48.718 1.000 Fisher's Exact Test.000.000 N of Valid Cases 97 a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,81. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Case Processing Summary Pelatihan K3 * Pernah Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent 97 100,0% 0,0% 97 100,0%
Pelatihan K3 * Pernah Crosstabulation Pernah Total Ya Tidak Pelatihan K3 Tidak Baik Count 12 0 12 Expected Count 2,0 10,0 12,0 Pelatihan K3 100,0%,0% 100,0% Pernah 75,0%,0% 12,4% kecelakaan kerja % of Total 12,4%,0% 12,4% Baik Count 4 81 85 Expected Count 14,0 71,0 85,0 Pelatihan K3 4,7% 95,3% 100,0% Pernah 25,0% 100,0% 87,6% kecelakaan kerja % of Total 4,1% 83,5% 87,6% Total Count 16 81 97 Expected Count 16,0 81,0 97,0 Pelatihan K3 16,5% 83,5% 100,0% Pernah 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% kecelakaan kerja % of Total 16,5% 83,5% 100,0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Pearson Chi-Square 69,326(b) 1,000 Continuity Correction(a) 62,581 1,000 Likelihood Ratio 54,611 1,000 Fisher's Exact Test,000,000 Linear-by-Linear Association 68,612 1,000 N of Valid Cases 97 a Computed only for a 2x2 table b 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,9
Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Behavioral Based Safety * Pernah 97 100.0% 0.0% 97 100.0% Behavioral Based Safety * Pernah Crosstabulation Pernah Ya Tidak Total Behavioral Based Safety Tidak Baik Count 11 0 11 Expected Count 1.8 9.2 11.0 Behavioral Based Safety 100.0%.0% 100.0% 68.8%.0% 11.3% % of Total 11.3%.0% 11.3% Baik Count 5 81 86 Expected Count 14.2 71.8 86.0 Behavioral Based Safety 5.8% 94.2% 100.0% 31.2% 100.0% 88.7% % of Total 5.2% 83.5% 88.7%
Total Count 16 81 97 Expected Count 16.0 81.0 97.0 Behavioral Based Safety 16.5% 83.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 16.5% 83.5% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df Pearson Chi-Square 62.810 a 1.000 Continuity Correction b 56.158 1.000 Likelihood Ratio 48.718 1.000 Fisher's Exact Test.000.000 N of Valid Cases 97 a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,81. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table