KUESIONER PENDATAAN FAKTOR FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN TERJADINYA PERDARAHAN POST PARTUM PADA IBU BERSALIN DI RSUD DELI SERDANG LUBUK PAKAM A. Data Umum Nama Reponden : Umur : Pendidikan : Pekerjaan : B. Data Khusus Faktor faktor yang berhubungan dengan terjadinya post partum pada ibu bersalin di RSUD Deli Serdang Lubuk Pakam. 1. Apakah sebelumnya ibu pernah mengalami setelah persalinan? 2. Jika ya disebabkan karna apa tersebut? a. Atonia uteri b. Retensio c. Laserasi jalan lahir d. Plasenta res.
Faktor atonia uteri menyebabkan post partum: 3. Apakah ibu pernah mengalami riwayat keracunan kehamilan sebelumnya? 4. Apakah ibu mempunyai penyakit kanker rahim? 5. Berapakah jumlah semua anak ibu a. 1-2 orang b. 3-4 orang c. Lebih dari 4 orang Faktor retensio menyebebkan post partum: 6. Apakah ibu pernah mengalami curettage atau secsio cesaria sebelumya? 7. Apakah ibu pernah mengalami penyakit endometriosis sebelumnya? Faktor laserasi jalan lahir menyebabkan post partum: 8. Apakah pada saat persalinan ibu pernah mengalami robekan vagina sebelumnya?
9. Apakah bayi ibu tidak lahir dengan posisi kepala? Faktor res menyebabkan post partum: 10. Apakah sebelumnya kontraksi uterus ibu tidak baik? 11. Apakah bayi ibu sebelumnya lahir sanggat cepat
MASTER DATA FAKTOR FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN TERJADINYA PERDARAHAN POST PARTUM PADA IBU BERSALIN NO Atonia Uteri Retensio Plasenta Laserasi Jalan Lahir Plasenta Res Perdarahan post partum 1. 1 0 0 0 0 2. 1 1 1 1 0 3. 0 1 0 0 1 4. 1 1 1 1 0 5. 1 1 0 0 0 6. 1 1 1 1 0 7. 1 0 0 0 1 8. 0 0 0 0 1 9. 1 0 1 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 1 11 1 1 1 1 0 12 1 1 0 0 1 13 1 0 0 0 1 14 1 1 0 0 1 15 1 1 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1 17 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 0 1 1 0 19 1 0 1 1 0 20 0 1 1 0 1 21 0 1 1 1 1 22 1 1 1 1 0 23 0 1 1 0 0 24 1 1 1 1 0 25 1 0 1 1 0 26. 1 1 1 1 0 27. 1 1 1 1 0 28. 1 1 1 1 0 29. 0 1 0 0 1 30. 0 0 0 0 1 31. 0 1 0 0 1 32. 0 1 0 0 1 33. 0 0 0 1 1 34. 0 0 0 1 1 35. 1 1 0 1 1 36. 0 0 1 0 1
37 1 0 1 1 1 38 0 1 1 1 0 39 1 1 1 1 0 40 0 1 0 0 1 41 1 0 1 1 1 42 0 1 1 1 1 43 1 0 1 0 1 44 0 1 0 1 1 45 0 0 1 0 1 46 1 0 0 1 0 47 1 1 1 1 0 48 0 1 1 1 0 49 1 1 1 1 0 50 1 0 0 0 1 51 0 0 1 1 1 52 1 0 0 1 1 53 0 1 1 0 0 54 1 1 0 1 0 55 1 1 1 1 0
Frequency Table Atonia Uteri Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid tidak atonia uteri 24 43.6 43.6 43.6 atonia uteri 31 56.4 56.4 100.0 55 100.0 100.0 retensio Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid tidak retensio 23 41.8 41.8 41.8 retensio 32 58.2 58.2 100.0 55 100.0 100.0 Laserasi jalan lahir Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid tidak laserasi jalan lahir 25 45.5 45.5 45.5 laserasi jalan lahir 30 54.5 54.5 100.0 55 100.0 100.0 Plasenta Res Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid tidak res 24 43.6 43.6 43.6 res 31 56.4 56.4 100.0 55 100.0 100.0 post partum Valid post partum Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 25 45.5 45.5 45.5 tidak post partm 30 54.5 54.5 100.0 55 100.0 100.0
atonia uteri * post partum Crosstab post partum post partum tidak post partm atonia uteri tidak atonia uteri Count 5 19 24 Expected Count 10.9 13.1 24.0 % within atonia uteri 20.8% 79.2% 100.0% atonia uteri Count 20 11 31 Expected Count 14.1 16.9 31.0 % within atonia uteri 64.5% 35.5% 100.0% Count 25 30 55 Expected Count 25.0 30.0 55.0 % within atonia uteri 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Pearson Chi-Square 10.411 a 1.001 Continuity Correction b 8.724 1.003 Likelihood Ratio 10.903 1.001 Fisher's Exact Test.002.001 Linear-by-Linear Association 10.222 1.001 N of Valid Cases b 55 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.91. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
retensio * post partum Crosstab post partum retensio tidak retensio retensio Count post partum tidak post partm 5 18 23 Expected Count 10.5 12.5 23.0 % within retensio 21.7% 78.3% 100.0% Count 20 12 32 Expected Count 14.5 17.5 32.0 % within retensio Count 62.5% 37.5% 100.0% 25 30 55 Expected Count 25.0 30.0 55.0 % within retensio 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Pearson Chi-Square 8.967 a 1.003 Continuity Correction b 7.399 1.007 Likelihood Ratio 9.366 1.002 Fisher's Exact Test.005.003 Linear-by-Linear Association 8.804 1.003 N of Valid Cases b 55 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.45. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
laserasi jalan lahir * post partum laserasi jalan lahir tidak laserasi jalan lahir laserasi jalan lahir Crosstab post partum post partum tidak post partm Count 5 20 25 Expected Count 11.4 13.6 25.0 % within laserasi jalan lahir 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% Count 20 10 30 Expected Count 13.6 16.4 30.0 % within laserasi jalan lahir 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% Count 25 30 55 Expected Count 25.0 30.0 55.0 % within laserasi jalan lahir 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Pearson Chi-Square 11.978 a 1.001 Continuity Correction b 10.170 1.001 Likelihood Ratio 12.580 1.000 Fisher's Exact Test.001.001 Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases b 55 11.760 1.001 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.36. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
palsenta res * post partum Crosstab post partum palsenta res tidak res Count post partum tidak post partm 5 19 24 Expected Count 10.9 13.1 24.0 % within palsenta res 20.8% 79.2% 100.0% res Count 20 11 31 Expected Count 14.1 16.9 31.0 % within palsenta res Count 64.5% 35.5% 100.0% 25 30 55 Expected Count 25.0 30.0 55.0 % within palsenta res 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Pearson Chi-Square 10.411 a 1.001 Continuity Correction b 8.724 1.003 Likelihood Ratio 10.903 1.001 Fisher's Exact Test.002.001 Linear-by-Linear Association 10.222 1.001 N of Valid Cases b 55 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.91. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table