Universitas Sumatera Utara

87 Lampiran 2 KUESIONER PENGARUH DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA TERHADAP AKSEPTABILITAS DAN PEMANFAATAN PUSAT INFORMASI KONSELING REMAJA (PIK REMAJA) PADA SISWA SMU NEGRI 2 KOTA TANJUNG BALAI TAHUN 2015 I. KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN 1. Usia : 2. Jenis Kelamin : 3. Apakah anda memiliki teman sekelompok : YA TIDAK II. DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA 1. Berilah tanda pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar 2. Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda NO ITEM PERTANYAAN YA TIDAK 1. Seluruh teman dalam kelompok saya memiliki jenis kelamin yang sama dengan saya 2. Saya dan teman kelompok memiliki hobi yang sama 3. Saya berbagi cerita, informasi dan pengalaman pribadi dengan teman kelompok saya 4. Saya selalu meluangkan waktu untuk teman kelompok saya 5. Teman kelompok tidak pernah memanfaatkan layanan konseling remaja di sekolah 6. Semua anggota di kelompok teman saya sudah memiliki pacar 7. Memiliki kelompok teman sebaya merupakan hal yang membanggakan bagi saya 8. Saya lebih senang mendengarkan nasihat teman kelompok bila dibandingkan dengan guru dan orang tua 9. Perilaku saya dipengaruhi oleh teman kelompok 10. Semakin banyak teman semakin besar pengaruhnya terhadap perilaku saya 11. Guru di sekolah sangat baik terhadap saya 12. Setiap selesai memberikan pelajaran, guru selalu

88 meyarankan kami agar mengikuti kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh PIK remaja 13. Guru ikut mendukung kegiatan yang dibuat oleh konselor di PIK remaja 14. Guru ikut membantu untuk mengkoordinir siswa setiap mengikuti kegiatan sosialisasi PIK remaja 15. Guru selalu dilibatkan oleh pihak sekolah dalam membantu siswa untuk mendapatkan informasi tentang kesehatan reproduksi 16. Sebaiknya guru yang menjadi konselor di sekolah 17. semua guru selalu mendukung kegiatan PIK remaja 18. Saya dekat dengan semua guru 19. Ada seorang guru yang menjadi tempat curhat saya 20. saya lebih senang curhat dengan guru atau dengan konselor dari PIK remaja III. AKSEPTABILITAS TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH 1. Berilah tanda pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar 2. Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda. NO ITEM PERTANYAAN YA TIDAK 1. Ruangan layanan PIK remaja disekolah seharusnya tertutup agar tidak diketahui orang lain. 2. Ruangan layanan PIK REMAJA disekolah sebaiknya ditata dengan bersih dan nyaman 3. Ruangan untuk konsultasi sebaiknya dibuat tersendiri agar tidak didengar orang lain. 4. Pemberi pelayanan konsultasi sebaiknya teman sebaya (peer group) 5. Saya merasa malu untuk datang ke PIK REMAJA 6. Saya merasa takut menjadi bahan ejekan teman atau orang lain yang saya kenal, apabila saya meminta pelayanan kesehatan reproduksi di sekolah 7. Saya lebih senang jika petugas pemberi layanan berjenis kelamin sama dengan saya 8. Petugas pemberi layanan sebaiknya seorang guru 9. Petugas sebaiknya mendengarkan dengan penuh perhatian saat saya menyampaikan masalah yang saya hadapi. 10. Waktu dalam konsultasi sebaiknya tidak dibatasi

89 IV. PEMANFAATAN TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH 1. Berilah tanda pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar 2. Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda. NO ITEM PERTANYAAN YA TIDAK 1. Apakah anda mengetahui bahwa di sekolah anda memiliki PIK REMAJA? 2. Pernahkah anda berkunjung dan berkonsultasi pada petugas di PIK REMAJA? 3. Apakah anda membutuhkan pelayanan konseling kesehatan reproduksi? 4. Apakah keberadaan PIK REMAJA di sekolah dapat membantu siswa dalam memberikan informasi kesehatan reproduksi? 5. Apakah pelayanan yang anda terima dari petugas PIK REMAJA sudah baik? 6. Apakah semua materi tentang kesehatan reproduksi yang siswa butuhkan dapat diberikan oleh petugas PIK REMAJA? 7. Apakah terdapat masalah pada saat anda melakukan konsultasi pada petugas di PIK REMAJA? 8. Apakah tempat melakukan konseling nyaman? 9. Apakah PIK REMAJA juga memberikan informas itentang kesehatan reproduksi melalui media cetak (brosur, leaflet, booklet, buku buku bacaan)? 10. Apakah PIK REMAJA memberikan informasi juga melalui diskusi kelompok (peer group)?

90 Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Reliability Dukungan Guru Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.891 10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N g1.77.430 30 g2.80.407 30 g3.77.430 30 g4.70.466 30 g5.70.466 30 g6.70.466 30 g7.77.430 30 g8.83.379 30 g9.67.479 30 g10.70.466 30

91 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item-Total Statistics Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item- Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted g1 6.63 8.171.629.880 g2 6.60 8.662.449.892 g3 6.63 8.171.629.880 g4 6.70 7.941.664.878 g5 6.70 7.941.664.878 g6 6.70 8.010.635.880 g7 6.63 8.171.629.880 g8 6.57 8.323.657.879 g9 6.73 7.582.792.868 g10 6.70 8.217.550.886 Mean Scale Statistics Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 7.40 9.903 3.147 10 Reliability Dukungan Teman Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

92 Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.843 10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N t1.73.450 30 t2.37.490 30 t3.33.479 30 t4.07.254 30 t5.20.407 30 t6.27.450 30 t7.53.507 30 t8.43.504 30 t9.40.498 30 t10.40.498 30 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item-Total Statistics Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item- Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted t1 3.00 7.172.573.825 t2 3.37 7.137.526.830 t3 3.40 6.731.721.810 t4 3.67 8.092.414.840 t5 3.53 7.499.489.833 t6 3.47 7.430.458.836 t7 3.20 6.648.706.811 t8 3.30 7.252.460.837 t9 3.33 7.126.518.831 t10 3.33 7.057.547.828

93 Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 3.73 8.754 2.959 10 Reliability Akseptabilitas Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.817 10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N a1.27.450 30 a2.33.479 30 a3.10.305 30 a4.30.466 30 a5.10.305 30 a6.23.430 30 a7.27.450 30 a8.23.430 30 a9.30.466 30 a10.40.498 30

94 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item-Total Statistics Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item- Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted a1 2.27 5.720.541.796 a2 2.20 5.407.650.783 a3 2.43 6.323.436.808 a4 2.23 5.702.524.798 a5 2.43 6.323.436.808 a6 2.30 5.734.566.794 a7 2.27 5.995.403.811 a8 2.30 5.872.493.802 a9 2.23 5.633.558.794 a10 2.13 5.844.412.812 Mean Scale Statistics Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 2.53 7.085 2.662 10 Reliability Pemanfaatan Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

95 Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.863 10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N p1.50.509 30 p2.33.479 30 p3.77.430 30 p4.43.504 30 p5.43.504 30 p6.13.346 30 p7.10.305 30 p8.07.254 30 p9.10.305 30 p10.07.254 30 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item-Total Statistics Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item- Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted p1 2.43 5.840.463.864 p2 2.60 5.766.539.855 p3 2.17 6.075.461.860 p4 2.50 5.362.694.839 p5 2.50 5.431.661.843 p6 2.80 5.890.732.839 p7 2.83 6.213.612.849 p8 2.87 6.464.549.855 p9 2.83 6.075.711.843 p10 2.87 6.395.606.852

96 Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 2.93 7.237 2.690 10 Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat Karakteristik Responden usia Frequency Valid Valid 16 65 33.5 33.5 33.5 17 121 62.4 62.4 95.9 18 8 4.1 4.1 100.0 sex Frequency Valid Valid Laki-laki 72 37.1 37.1 37.1 Perempuan 122 62.9 62.9 100.0 T_kelompok Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 76 39.2 39.2 39.2 Ya 118 60.8 60.8 100.0

97 Dukungan Guru Frequency Table g1 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 119 61.3 61.3 61.3 Ya 75 38.7 38.7 100.0 g2 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 78 40.2 40.2 40.2 Ya 116 59.8 59.8 100.0 g3 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 127 65.5 65.5 65.5 Ya 67 34.5 34.5 100.0 g4 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 87 44.8 44.8 44.8 Ya 107 55.2 55.2 100.0

98 g5 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 111 57.2 57.2 57.2 Ya 83 42.8 42.8 100.0 g6 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 74 38.1 38.1 38.1 Ya 120 61.9 61.9 100.0 g7 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 67 34.5 34.5 34.5 Ya 127 65.5 65.5 100.0 g8 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 86 44.3 44.3 44.3 Ya 108 55.7 55.7 100.0

99 g9 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 80 41.2 41.2 41.2 Ya 114 58.8 58.8 100.0 g10 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 95 49.0 49.0 49.0 Ya 99 51.0 51.0 100.0 Kat_guru Frequency Valid Valid Kurang 106 54.6 54.6 54.6 Baik 88 45.4 45.4 100.0 Dukungan Teman Frequency Table t1 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 61 31.4 31.4 31.4 Ya 133 68.6 68.6 100.0

100 t2 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 110 56.7 56.7 56.7 Ya 84 43.3 43.3 100.0 t3 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 97 50.0 50.0 50.0 Ya 97 50.0 50.0 100.0 t4 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 118 60.8 60.8 60.8 Ya 76 39.2 39.2 100.0 t5 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 101 52.1 52.1 52.1 Ya 93 47.9 47.9 100.0

101 t6 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 126 64.9 64.9 64.9 Ya 68 35.1 35.1 100.0 t7 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 114 58.8 58.8 58.8 Ya 80 41.2 41.2 100.0 t8 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 123 63.4 63.4 63.4 Ya 71 36.6 36.6 100.0 t9 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 128 66.0 66.0 66.0 Ya 66 34.0 34.0 100.0

102 t10 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 132 68.0 68.0 68.0 Ya 62 32.0 32.0 100.0 Kat_teman Frequency Valid Valid Kurang 133 68.6 68.6 68.6 Baik 61 31.4 31.4 100.0 Akseptabilitas Frequency Table a1 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 49 25.3 25.3 25.3 Ya 145 74.7 74.7 100.0 a2 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 109 56.2 56.2 56.2 Ya 85 43.8 43.8 100.0

103 a3 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 48 24.7 24.7 24.7 Ya 146 75.3 75.3 100.0 a4 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 92 47.4 47.4 47.4 Ya 102 52.6 52.6 100.0 a5 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 88 45.4 45.4 45.4 Ya 106 54.6 54.6 100.0 a6 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 129 66.5 66.5 66.5 Ya 65 33.5 33.5 100.0

104 a7 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 141 72.7 72.7 72.7 Ya 53 27.3 27.3 100.0 a8 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 142 73.2 73.2 73.2 Ya 52 26.8 26.8 100.0 a9 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 145 74.7 74.7 74.7 Ya 49 25.3 25.3 100.0 a10 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 146 75.3 75.3 75.3 Ya 48 24.7 24.7 100.0

105 akseptabilitas Frequency Valid Valid Tidak menerima 132 68.0 68.0 68.0 Menerima 62 32.0 32.0 100.0 Pemanfaatan Frequency Table p1 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 81 41.8 41.8 41.8 Ya 113 58.2 58.2 100.0 p2 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 98 50.5 50.5 50.5 Ya 96 49.5 49.5 100.0 p3 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 95 49.0 49.0 49.0 Ya 99 51.0 51.0 100.0

106 p4 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 93 47.9 47.9 47.9 Ya 101 52.1 52.1 100.0 p5 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 80 41.2 41.2 41.2 Ya 114 58.8 58.8 100.0 p6 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 109 56.2 56.2 56.2 Ya 85 43.8 43.8 100.0 p7 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 100 51.5 51.5 51.5 Ya 94 48.5 48.5 100.0

107 p8 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 84 43.3 43.3 43.3 Ya 110 56.7 56.7 100.0 p9 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 104 53.6 53.6 53.6 Ya 90 46.4 46.4 100.0 p10 Frequency Valid Valid Tidak 87 44.8 44.8 44.8 Ya 107 55.2 55.2 100.0 pemanfaatan Frequency Valid Valid Tidak memanfaatkan 104 53.6 53.6 53.6 Memanfaatkan 90 46.4 46.4 100.0

108 Lampiran 5 : Analisis Bivariat Crosstabs Kat_teman * akseptabilitas Crosstab akseptabilitas Tidak menerima Menerima Total Kat_teman Kurang Count 91 42 133 % within Kat_teman 68.4% 31.6% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 68.9% 67.7% 68.6% % of Total 46.9% 21.6% 68.6% Baik Count 41 20 61 % within Kat_teman 67.2% 32.8% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 31.1% 32.3% 31.4% % of Total 21.1% 10.3% 31.4% Total Count 132 62 194 % within Kat_teman 68.0% 32.0% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0% Value Chi-Square Tests df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Pearson Chi-Square.028 a 1.867 Continuity Correction b.000 1.999 Likelihood Ratio.028 1.867 Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Fisher's Exact Test.870.496 Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases b 194.028 1.867 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,49. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

109 Kat_guru * akseptabilitas Crosstab akseptabilitas Tidak menerima Menerima Total Kat_guru Kurang Count 82 24 106 % within Kat_guru 77.4% 22.6% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 62.1% 38.7% 54.6% % of Total 42.3% 12.4% 54.6% Baik Count 50 38 88 % within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 37.9% 61.3% 45.4% % of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4% Total Count 132 62 194 % within Kat_guru 68.0% 32.0% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0% Value Chi-Square Tests df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.329 a 1.002 Continuity Correction b 8.408 1.004 Likelihood Ratio 9.352 1.002 Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Fisher's Exact Test.003.002 Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases b 194 9.281 1.002 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,12. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

110 Kat_teman * pemanfaatan Crosstab Tidak memanfaatkan pemanfaatan Memanfaatkan Total Kat_teman Kurang Count 78 55 133 % within Kat_teman 58.6% 41.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 75.0% 61.1% 68.6% % of Total 40.2% 28.4% 68.6% Baik Count 26 35 61 % within Kat_teman 42.6% 57.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 25.0% 38.9% 31.4% % of Total 13.4% 18.0% 31.4% Total Count 104 90 194 % within Kat_teman 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% Value Chi-Square Tests df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 4.317 a 1.038 Continuity Correction b 3.697 1.055 Likelihood Ratio 4.319 1.038 Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Fisher's Exact Test.044.027 Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases b 194 4.295 1.038 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,30. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

111 Kat_guru * pemanfaatan Crosstab Tidak memanfaatkan pemanfaatan Memanfaatkan Total Kat_guru Kurang Count 54 52 106 % within Kat_guru 50.9% 49.1% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 51.9% 57.8% 54.6% % of Total 27.8% 26.8% 54.6% Baik Count 50 38 88 % within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 48.1% 42.2% 45.4% % of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4% Total Count 104 90 194 % within Kat_guru 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% Value Chi-Square Tests df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square.667 a 1.414 Continuity Correction b.452 1.501 Likelihood Ratio.668 1.414 Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Fisher's Exact Test.470.251 Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases b 194.664 1.415 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 40,82. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

112 Correlations Correlations gtot ttot atot ptot gtot Pearson Correlation 1.060.299 ** -.007 Sig. (2-tailed).407.000.922 N 194 194 194 194 ttot Pearson Correlation.060 1 -.037.335 ** Sig. (2-tailed).407.609.000 N 194 194 194 194 atot Pearson Correlation.299 ** -.037 1 -.029 Sig. (2-tailed).000.609.688 N 194 194 194 194 ptot Pearson Correlation -.007.335 ** -.029 1 Sig. (2-tailed).922.000.688 N 194 194 194 194 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

113 Lampiran 6 : Analisis Multivariat Uji Normalitas Data NPar Tests One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test ttot gtot atot ptot N 194 194 194 194 Normal Parameters a Mean 4.23 5.23 4.39 5.22 Most Extreme Differences Std. Deviation 2.508 2.238 2.348 2.934 Absolute.086.088.089.092 Positive.086.088.086.081 Negative -.075 -.088 -.089 -.092 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.196 1.224 1.243 1.279 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed).114.100.091.076 a. Test distribution is Normal. Multivariat Regression Model Variables Entered/Removed b Variables Entered Variables Removed 1 ttot, gtot a. Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: atot Method Model R R Square Model Summary Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.304 a.093.083 2.248 a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

114 ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 98.579 2 49.289 9.751.000 a Residual 965.427 191 5.055 Total 1064.005 193 a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot b. Dependent Variable: atot Model Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 2.943.482 6.110.000 gtot.318.072.303 4.384.000 ttot -.052.065 -.055 -.798.426 a. Dependent Variable: atot Regression Model Variables Entered/Removed b Variables Entered Variables Removed 1 ttot, gtot a. Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: ptot Method t Sig. Model R R Square Model Summary Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.336 a.113.104 2.777 a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

115 ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 188.055 2 94.027 12.189.000 a Residual 1473.414 191 7.714 Total 1661.469 193 a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot b. Dependent Variable: ptot Model Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 3.742.595 6.289.000 gtot -.036.089 -.027 -.399.690 ttot.394.080.337 4.936.000 a. Dependent Variable: ptot t Sig.

116 Lampiran 7 : Kanonik Manova The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial design s. A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 178 cases accepted. 0 cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values. 16 cases rejected because of missing data. 1 non-empty cell. 1 design will be processed. Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Correlations with Std. Devs. on Diagonal atot ptot atot 2,26647 ptot -,00373 2,86264 Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations Log(Determinant) = -,00001 Bartlett test of sphericity =,00242 with 1 D. F. Significance =,961 F(max) criterion = 1,59527 with (2;175) D. F. Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Variances and Covariances atot ptot atot 5,13687 ptot -,02421 8,19468 Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products atot ptot atot 898,95265 ptot -4,23707 1434,06901

117 A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * EFFECT.. WITHIN CELLS Regression Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products atot ptot atot 28,03611 ptot -19,11125 66,13324 Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 2, M = -1/2, N = 86 ) Test Name Value Approx. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F Pillais,07371 3,34842 4,00 350,00,010 Hotellings,07718 3,33798 4,00 346,00,011 Wilks,92736 3,34328 4,00 348,00,011 Roys,05381 Note.. F statistic for WILKS' Lambda is exact. Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor. Sq. Cor 1,05687 73,68685 73,68685,23197,05381 2,02031 26,31315 100,00000,14108,01990 Dimension Reduction Analysis Roots Wilks L. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F 1 TO 2,92736 3,34328 4,00 348,00,011 2 TO 2,98010 3,55393 1,00 175,00,061 EFFECT.. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (2;175) D. F. Variable Sq. Mul. R Adj. Rsq. Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F atot,03024,01916 14,01806 5,13687 2,72891,068 ptot,04408,03316 33,06662 8,19468 4,03513,019

118 Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable 1 2 atot -,23410,36907 ptot,28642,18972 Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable 1 2 atot -,53573,84462 ptot,83385,55235 Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Function No. Variable 1 2 atot -,55224,83369 ptot,84446,53562 Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV 1 50,90371 50,90371 2,73915 2,73915 2 49,09629 100,00000,97721 3,71636 Raw canonical coefficients for COVARIATES Function No. COVARIATE 1 2 gtot -,14889,43896 ttot,40973,16271 Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES CAN. VAR. COVARIATE 1 2 gtot -,32162,94824

119 ttot,93061,36957 Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical variables CAN. VAR. Covariate 1 2 gtot -,36909,92939 ttot,94701,32121 Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV 1 2,77945 2,77945 51,65262 51,65262 2,96230 3,74175 48,34738 100,00000 Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term --- Individual Univariate,9500 confidence intervals Dependent variable.. atot COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-value Sig. of t Lower -95% CL-Upper gtot 1618031416,1527312558,07897 2,04904,042,00596,31765 ttot -,0763193958 -,0757455506,07510-1,01620,311 -,22454,07190 Dependent variable.. ptot COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-value Sig. of t ower -95% CL- Upper gtot,0116611736,0086525788,09974,11692,907 -,18518,20850 ttot,2694603936,2102226336,09486 2,84068,005,08225,45667 A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * EFFECT.. CONSTANT Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products atot ptot atot 234,56343 ptot 239,67718 244,90242 Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 0, N = 86 )

120 Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F Pillais,30230 37,69586 2,00 174,00,000 Hotellings,43329 37,69586 2,00 174,00,000 Wilks,69770 37,69586 2,00 174,00,000 Roys,30230 Note.. F statistics are exact. Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor. 1,43329 100,00000 100,00000,54982 EFFECT.. CONSTANT (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (1;175) D. F. Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F atot 234,56343 898,95265 234,56343 5,13687 45,66269,000 ptot 244,90242 1434,06901 244,90242 8,19468 29,88554,000 EFFECT.. CONSTANT (Cont.) Raw discriminant function coefficients Function No. Variable 1 atot,34343 ptot,22032 Standardized discriminant function coefficients Function No. Variable 1 atot,77838 ptot,63071 Estimates of effects for canonical variables Canonical Variable Parameter 1

121 1 2,18056 Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Canonical Variable Variable 1 atot,77602 ptot,62780

122 Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Reliability Dukungan Guru Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.891 10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N g1.77.430 30 g2.80.407 30 g3.77.430 30 g4.70.466 30 g5.70.466 30 g6.70.466 30 g7.77.430 30 g8.83.379 30 g9.67.479 30 g10.70.466 30 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item-Total Statistics Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted g1 6.63 8.171.629.880 g2 6.60 8.662.449.892 g3 6.63 8.171.629.880 g4 6.70 7.941.664.878 g5 6.70 7.941.664.878 g6 6.70 8.010.635.880

123 g7 6.63 8.171.629.880 g8 6.57 8.323.657.879 g9 6.73 7.582.792.868 g10 6.70 8.217.550.886 Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 7.40 9.903 3.147 10 Reliability Dukungan Teman Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.843 10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N t1.73.450 30 t2.37.490 30 t3.33.479 30 t4.07.254 30 t5.20.407 30 t6.27.450 30 t7.53.507 30 t8.43.504 30 t9.40.498 30 t10.40.498 30

124 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item-Total Statistics Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted t1 3.00 7.172.573.825 t2 3.37 7.137.526.830 t3 3.40 6.731.721.810 t4 3.67 8.092.414.840 t5 3.53 7.499.489.833 t6 3.47 7.430.458.836 t7 3.20 6.648.706.811 t8 3.30 7.252.460.837 t9 3.33 7.126.518.831 t10 3.33 7.057.547.828 Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 3.73 8.754 2.959 10 Reliability Akseptabilitas Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.817 10

125 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N a1.27.450 30 a2.33.479 30 a3.10.305 30 a4.30.466 30 a5.10.305 30 a6.23.430 30 a7.27.450 30 a8.23.430 30 a9.30.466 30 a10.40.498 30 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item-Total Statistics Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted a1 2.27 5.720.541.796 a2 2.20 5.407.650.783 a3 2.43 6.323.436.808 a4 2.23 5.702.524.798 a5 2.43 6.323.436.808 a6 2.30 5.734.566.794 a7 2.27 5.995.403.811 a8 2.30 5.872.493.802 a9 2.23 5.633.558.794 a10 2.13 5.844.412.812 Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 2.53 7.085 2.662 10 Reliability Pemanfaatan Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 Excluded a 0.0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

126 Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items.863 10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N p1.50.509 30 p2.33.479 30 p3.77.430 30 p4.43.504 30 p5.43.504 30 p6.13.346 30 p7.10.305 30 p8.07.254 30 p9.10.305 30 p10.07.254 30 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Item-Total Statistics Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted p1 2.43 5.840.463.864 p2 2.60 5.766.539.855 p3 2.17 6.075.461.860 p4 2.50 5.362.694.839 p5 2.50 5.431.661.843 p6 2.80 5.890.732.839 p7 2.83 6.213.612.849 p8 2.87 6.464.549.855 p9 2.83 6.075.711.843 p10 2.87 6.395.606.852 Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 2.93 7.237 2.690 10

127 Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat Karakteristik Responden usia Valid 16 65 33.5 33.5 33.5 17 121 62.4 62.4 95.9 18 8 4.1 4.1 100.0 sex Valid Laki-laki 72 37.1 37.1 37.1 Perempuan 122 62.9 62.9 100.0 T_kelompok Valid Tidak 76 39.2 39.2 39.2 Ya 118 60.8 60.8 100.0 Dukungan Guru Frequency Table g1 Valid Tidak 119 61.3 61.3 61.3 Ya 75 38.7 38.7 100.0 g2 Valid Tidak 78 40.2 40.2 40.2 Ya 116 59.8 59.8 100.0 g3 Valid Tidak 127 65.5 65.5 65.5 Ya 67 34.5 34.5 100.0

128 g2 Valid Tidak 78 40.2 40.2 40.2 Ya 116 59.8 59.8 100.0 g4 Valid Tidak 87 44.8 44.8 44.8 Ya 107 55.2 55.2 100.0 g5 Valid Tidak 111 57.2 57.2 57.2 Ya 83 42.8 42.8 100.0 g6 Valid Tidak 74 38.1 38.1 38.1 Ya 120 61.9 61.9 100.0 g7 Valid Tidak 67 34.5 34.5 34.5 Ya 127 65.5 65.5 100.0 g8 Valid Tidak 86 44.3 44.3 44.3 Ya 108 55.7 55.7 100.0

129 g9 Valid Tidak 80 41.2 41.2 41.2 Ya 114 58.8 58.8 100.0 g10 Valid Tidak 95 49.0 49.0 49.0 Ya 99 51.0 51.0 100.0 Kat_guru Valid Kurang 106 54.6 54.6 54.6 Baik 88 45.4 45.4 100.0 Dukungan Teman Frequency Table t1 Valid Tidak 61 31.4 31.4 31.4 Ya 133 68.6 68.6 100.0 t2 Valid Tidak 110 56.7 56.7 56.7 Ya 84 43.3 43.3 100.0 t3 Valid Tidak 97 50.0 50.0 50.0 Ya 97 50.0 50.0 100.0

130 t4 Valid Tidak 118 60.8 60.8 60.8 Ya 76 39.2 39.2 100.0 t5 Valid Tidak 101 52.1 52.1 52.1 Ya 93 47.9 47.9 100.0 t6 Valid Tidak 126 64.9 64.9 64.9 Ya 68 35.1 35.1 100.0 t7 Valid Tidak 114 58.8 58.8 58.8 Ya 80 41.2 41.2 100.0 t8 Valid Tidak 123 63.4 63.4 63.4 Ya 71 36.6 36.6 100.0 t9 Valid Tidak 128 66.0 66.0 66.0 Ya 66 34.0 34.0 100.0

131 t10 Valid Tidak 132 68.0 68.0 68.0 Ya 62 32.0 32.0 100.0 Kat_teman Valid Kurang 133 68.6 68.6 68.6 Baik 61 31.4 31.4 100.0 Akseptabilitas Frequency Table a1 Valid Tidak 49 25.3 25.3 25.3 Ya 145 74.7 74.7 100.0 a2 Valid Tidak 109 56.2 56.2 56.2 Ya 85 43.8 43.8 100.0 a3 Valid Tidak 48 24.7 24.7 24.7 Ya 146 75.3 75.3 100.0 a4 Valid Tidak 92 47.4 47.4 47.4 Ya 102 52.6 52.6 100.0 a5

132 Valid Tidak 88 45.4 45.4 45.4 Ya 106 54.6 54.6 100.0 a6 Valid Tidak 129 66.5 66.5 66.5 Ya 65 33.5 33.5 100.0 a7 Valid Tidak 141 72.7 72.7 72.7 Ya 53 27.3 27.3 100.0 a8 Valid Tidak 142 73.2 73.2 73.2 Ya 52 26.8 26.8 100.0 a9 Valid Tidak 145 74.7 74.7 74.7 Ya 49 25.3 25.3 100.0 a10 Valid Tidak 146 75.3 75.3 75.3 Ya 48 24.7 24.7 100.0

133 akseptabilitas Valid Tidak menerima 132 68.0 68.0 68.0 Menerima 62 32.0 32.0 100.0 Pemanfaatan Frequency Table p1 Valid Tidak 81 41.8 41.8 41.8 Ya 113 58.2 58.2 100.0 p2 Valid Tidak 98 50.5 50.5 50.5 Ya 96 49.5 49.5 100.0 p3 Valid Tidak 95 49.0 49.0 49.0 Ya 99 51.0 51.0 100.0 p4 Valid Tidak 93 47.9 47.9 47.9 Ya 101 52.1 52.1 100.0 p5 Valid Tidak 80 41.2 41.2 41.2 Ya 114 58.8 58.8 100.0 p6

134 Valid Tidak 109 56.2 56.2 56.2 Ya 85 43.8 43.8 100.0 p7 Valid Tidak 100 51.5 51.5 51.5 Ya 94 48.5 48.5 100.0 p8 Valid Tidak 84 43.3 43.3 43.3 Ya 110 56.7 56.7 100.0 p9 Valid Tidak 104 53.6 53.6 53.6 Ya 90 46.4 46.4 100.0 p10 Valid Tidak 87 44.8 44.8 44.8 Ya 107 55.2 55.2 100.0 pemanfaatan Valid Tidak memanfaatkan 104 53.6 53.6 53.6 Memanfaatkan 90 46.4 46.4 100.0

135 Lampiran 5 : Analisis Bivariat Correlations Correlations gtot ttot atot ptot gtot Pearson Correlation 1.060.299 ** -.007 Sig. (2-tailed).407.000.922 N 194 194 194 194 ttot Pearson Correlation.060 1 -.037.335 ** Sig. (2-tailed).407.609.000 N 194 194 194 194 atot Pearson Correlation.299 ** -.037 1 -.029 Sig. (2-tailed).000.609.688 N 194 194 194 194 ptot Pearson Correlation -.007.335 ** -.029 1 Sig. (2-tailed).922.000.688 N 194 194 194 194 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

136 Crosstabs Kat_teman * akseptabilitas Crosstab akseptabilitas Tidak menerima Menerima Total Kat_teman Kurang Count 91 42 133 % within Kat_teman 68.4% 31.6% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 68.9% 67.7% 68.6% % of Total 46.9% 21.6% 68.6% Baik Count 41 20 61 % within Kat_teman 67.2% 32.8% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 31.1% 32.3% 31.4% % of Total 21.1% 10.3% 31.4% Total Count 132 62 194 % within Kat_teman 68.0% 32.0% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0% Value Chi-Square Tests df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Pearson Chi-Square.028 a 1.867 Continuity Correction b.000 1.999 Likelihood Ratio.028 1.867 Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Fisher's Exact Test.870.496 Linear-by-Linear Association.028 1.867 N of Valid Cases b 194 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,49. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

137 Kat_guru * akseptabilitas Crosstab akseptabilitas Tidak menerima Menerima Total Kat_guru Kurang Count 82 24 106 % within Kat_guru 77.4% 22.6% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 62.1% 38.7% 54.6% % of Total 42.3% 12.4% 54.6% Baik Count 50 38 88 % within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 37.9% 61.3% 45.4% % of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4% Total Count 132 62 194 % within Kat_guru 68.0% 32.0% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0% Value Chi-Square Tests df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.329 a 1.002 Continuity Correction b 8.408 1.004 Likelihood Ratio 9.352 1.002 Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Fisher's Exact Test.003.002 Linear-by-Linear Association 9.281 1.002 N of Valid Cases b 194 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,12. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

138 Kat_teman * pemanfaatan Crosstab pemanfaatan Tidak memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Total Kat_teman Kurang Count 78 55 133 % within Kat_teman 58.6% 41.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 75.0% 61.1% 68.6% % of Total 40.2% 28.4% 68.6% Baik Count 26 35 61 % within Kat_teman 42.6% 57.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 25.0% 38.9% 31.4% % of Total 13.4% 18.0% 31.4% Total Count 104 90 194 % within Kat_teman 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% Value Chi-Square Tests df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 4.317 a 1.038 Continuity Correction b 3.697 1.055 Likelihood Ratio 4.319 1.038 Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Fisher's Exact Test.044.027 Linear-by-Linear Association 4.295 1.038 N of Valid Cases b 194 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,30. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

139 Kat_guru * pemanfaatan Crosstab pemanfaatan Tidak memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Total Kat_guru Kurang Count 54 52 106 % within Kat_guru 50.9% 49.1% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 51.9% 57.8% 54.6% % of Total 27.8% 26.8% 54.6% Baik Count 50 38 88 % within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 48.1% 42.2% 45.4% % of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4% Total Count 104 90 194 % within Kat_guru 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% Value Chi-Square Tests df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Pearson Chi-Square.667 a 1.414 Continuity Correction b.452 1.501 Likelihood Ratio.668 1.414 Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Fisher's Exact Test.470.251 Linear-by-Linear Association.664 1.415 N of Valid Cases b 194 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 40,82. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

140 Correlations Correlations gtot ttot atot ptot gtot Pearson Correlation 1.060.299 ** -.007 Sig. (2-tailed).407.000.922 N 194 194 194 194 ttot Pearson Correlation.060 1 -.037.335 ** Sig. (2-tailed).407.609.000 N 194 194 194 194 atot Pearson Correlation.299 ** -.037 1 -.029 Sig. (2-tailed).000.609.688 N 194 194 194 194 ptot Pearson Correlation -.007.335 ** -.029 1 Sig. (2-tailed).922.000.688 N 194 194 194 194 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

141 Lampiran 6 : Analisis Multivariat Uji Normalitas Data NPar Tests One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test ttot gtot atot ptot N 194 194 194 194 Normal Parameters a Mean 4.23 5.23 4.39 5.22 Std. Deviation 2.508 2.238 2.348 2.934 Most Extreme Differences Absolute.086.088.089.092 Positive.086.088.086.081 Negative -.075 -.088 -.089 -.092 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.196 1.224 1.243 1.279 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed).114.100.091.076 a. Test distribution is Normal. Multivariat Regression Variables Entered/Removed b Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 ttot, gtot a. Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: atot Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.304 a.093.083 2.248 a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 98.579 2 49.289 9.751.000 a Residual 965.427 191 5.055 Total 1064.005 193 a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

142 ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 98.579 2 49.289 9.751.000 a Residual 965.427 191 5.055 Total 1064.005 193 b. Dependent Variable: atot Model Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 2.943.482 6.110.000 gtot.318.072.303 4.384.000 ttot -.052.065 -.055 -.798.426 a. Dependent Variable: atot t Sig. Regression Variables Entered/Removed b Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 ttot, gtot a. Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: ptot Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.336 a.113.104 2.777 a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

143 1 Regression 188.055 2 94.027 12.189.000 a Residual 1473.414 191 7.714 Total 1661.469 193 a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot b. Dependent Variable: ptot Model Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 3.742.595 6.289.000 gtot -.036.089 -.027 -.399.690 ttot.394.080.337 4.936.000 a. Dependent Variable: ptot t Sig.

144 Lampiran 7 : Kanonik * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial design s. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 194 cases accepted. 0 cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values. 0 cases rejected because of missing data. 1 non-empty cell. 1 design will be processed. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Correlations with Std. Devs. on Diagonal atot ptot atot 2,24824 ptot -,00941 2,77745 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations Log(Determinant) = -,00009 Bartlett test of sphericity =,01678 with 1 D. F. Significance =,897 F(max) criterion = 1,52618 with (2;191) D. F. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Variances and Covariances atot ptot atot 5,05459 ptot -,05875 7,71421

145 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products atot ptot atot 965,42656 ptot -11,22187 1473,41412 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e -- Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * EFFECT.. WITHIN CELLS Regression Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products atot ptot atot 98,57859 ptot -27,40184 188,05495 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 2, M = -1/2, N = 94 ) Test Name Value Approx. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F Pillais,20481 10,89542 4,00 3 82,00,000 Hotellings,22933 10,83579 4,00 3 78,00,000 Wilks,80526 10,86575 4,00 3 80,00,000 Roys,12281 Note.. F statistic for WILKS' Lambda is exact. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor. Sq. Cor 1,14001 61,05138 61,05138,35045,12281 2,08932 38,94862 100,00000,28635,08200

146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dimension Reduction Analysis Roots Wilks L. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F 1 TO 2,80526 10,86575 4,00 380,00,000 2 TO 2,91800 17,06020 1,00 191,00,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT.. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (2;191) D. F. Variable Sq. Mul. R Adj. R- sq. Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F atot,09265,08315 49,28929 5,05459 9,75139,000 ptot,11319,10390 94,02748 7,71421 12,18887,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable 1 2 atot -,20693,37245 ptot,29312,17419 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable 1 2 atot -,48587,87451 ptot,86003,51107 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Function No.

147 Variable 1 2 atot -,51085,85967 ptot,87414,48567 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV 481 173 1 51,25504 51,25504 6,29481 6,29 2 48,74496 100,00000 3,99692 10,29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Raw canonical coefficients for COVARIATES Function No. COVARIATE 1 2 gtot -,21738,39133 ttot,36015,17273 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES CAN. VAR. COVARIATE 1 2 gtot -,48647,87575 ttot,90328,43322 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical variables CAN. VAR. Covariate 1 2 gtot -,43245,90166 ttot,87418,48560 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

148 Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV 992 000 1 5,84100 5,84100 47,55992 47,55 2 4,29990 10,14090 52,44008 100,00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term --- Individual Univariate,9500 confidence intervals Dependent variable.. atot COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t- Value Sig. of t Lower -95% CL- Upper gtot,3175620935,3026715609,07244 4,38351,000,17467,46046 ttot -,0515529701 -,0550674361,06464 -,79753,426 -,17905,07595 Dependent variable.. ptot COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t- Value Sig. of t Lower -95% CL- Upper gtot -,0357097087 -,0272367323,08950 -,39900,690 -,21224,14082 ttot,3941952744,3369599727,07986 4,93629,000,23668,55171 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e -- Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * EFFECT.. CONSTANT Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products atot ptot atot 188,72336 ptot 239,97662 305,14917 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 0, N = 94 )

149 Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F Pillais,28897 38,60872 2,00 1 90,00,000 Hotellings,40641 38,60872 2,00 1 90,00,000 Wilks,71103 38,60872 2,00 1 90,00,000 Roys,28897 Note.. F statistics are exact. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor. 1,40641 100,00000 100,00000,53756 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT.. CONSTANT (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (1;191) D. F. Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F atot 188,72336 965,42656 188,72336 5,05 459 37,33703,000 ptot 305,14917 1473,41412 305,14917 7,71 421 39,55676,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFECT.. CONSTANT (Cont.) Raw discriminant function coefficients Function No. Variable 1 atot,31150 ptot,25939 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Standardized discriminant function coefficients Function No.

150 Variable 1 atot,70032 ptot,72045 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Estimates of effects for canonical variables Canonical Variable Parameter 1 1 1,88747 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Canonical Variable Variable 1 atot,69354 ptot,71386 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

153

154

155

156