THE STUDY OF IMPLICATURE USED BY THE HOST AND JAYA SUPRANA IN KICK ANDY SHOW ;KELIRUMOLOGIEPISODE UNDERGRADUATE THESIS

Transkripsi

1 THE STUDY OF IMPLICATURE USED BY THE HOST AND JAYA SUPRANA IN KICK ANDY SHOW ;KELIRUMOLOGIEPISODE UNDERGRADUATE THESIS BY FADIL MUHTAD HIDAYAT STUDY PROGRAMOF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGES AND LITERATURE FACULTY OF CULTURE STUDIES UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA 2015 i

2 ABSTRACT Muhtad Hidayat, Fadil The Study of Implicature Used by the Hostand Jaya Suprana in Kick Andy Show; Kelirumologi Episode. Study Program of English, University of Brawijaya. Supervisor: Endang Sasanti; Co-supervisor: Muhammad Rozin Keywords: implicature, Kick Andy Show, kelirumologi Consciously or not, ideal communication does not always happen in conversation. It may lead to what is called implicature. In this study, the researcher conducted a study about Implicature in Kick Andy Show, specifically on Kelirumologi episode that reveals its occurrence in the interview. The researcher uses Grice s theory which reveals the implicit meaning found in the conversation. There are two problems in the study which need to be unraveled, those are : (1) What are the types of implicatures used in the interview between Andy F. Noya and Jaya Suprana in Kick Andy show? (2) How are the implicatures used in the interview between Andy F. Noya and Jaya Suprana in Kick Andy show? This study uses descriptive qualitative method as it describes the phenomena of language that is used in the current interview. It is a qualitative study since the data are in the forms of sentences which are not statistically analyzed and directed toward determining the nature of situation, as it exists at the time of study. Qualitative study assumes that reality is socially constructed through individual or collective definitions of a situation. This study discovers that there are nineteen statements conveying implicature voiced by Andy and Jaya Supranadivided into two categories of conversational implicature; Generalized Conversational Implicature and Particularized Conversational Implicature. On its findings, implicature is often used by Andy F. Noya and Jaya Suprana as a strategy to convey implicit meaning towards audience to explain speaker s intentions, which presents conceivable explanations of how implied meaning can be expressed by the addressee. It can be concluded that to understand particularized conversational implicature is more difficult than generalized conversational implicature. The reasons are because the hearers will (1) understand the meaning of utterance if they know the context, and (2) have background knowledge or prior knowledge. The researcher suggests the next students who intendto continue this study to use data related to the association of Implicature and Gender by comparing implicature used by both men and women. Next, for English Study Program to add more references relating to this topic in order to help the next researchers in their analysis of their study. vi

3 ABSTRAK Muhtad Hidayat, Fadil Sebuah Studi tentang Implikatur yang digunakan olehpembawa Acara dan Jaya Suprana di Kick Andy Show;EpisodeKelirumologi. Program Studi Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Brawijaya. Pembimbing I: Endang Sasanti; Pembimbing II: Muhammad Rozin Keywords: implikatur, Kick Andy Show, kelirumologi Sadar atau tidak, komunikasi yang ideal tidak selalu terjadi dalam percakapan. Hal ini dapat menyebabkan apa yang disebut implikatur. Dalam penelitian ini, peneliti melakukan studi tentang implikatur di Kick Andy Show, khusus pada episode kelirumologi yang mengungkapkan fenomenayang terjadi dalam wawancara tersebut. Peneliti menggunakan teori Grice yang mengungkap makna tersirat yang ditemukan dalam sebuah percakapan. Ada dua masalah dalam studi yang terurai, yaitu: (1) Apa jenis implikatur yang digunakan dalam wawancara antara Andy F. Noya dan Jaya Suprana di acara Kick Andy? (2) Bagaimana implikatur digunakan dalam wawancara antara Andy F. Noya dan Jaya Suprana di acara Kick Andy? Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif karena menggambarkan fenomena bahasa yang digunakan dalam wawancara terkait.studiini bersifat kualitatif karena data dalam bentuk kalimat, yang tidak dianalisis secara statistik dan diarahkan menentukan situasi, seperti yang ada pada saat studi. Studi kualitatif mengasumsikan bahwa realitas sosial dibangun melalui definisi individu atau situasi kolektif. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa ada sembilan belas pernyataan yang mengandung implikatur diutarakan oleh Andy dan Jaya Suprana yang dibagi menjadi dua kategori Implikatur Percakapan; Implikatur Percakapan Umum dan Implikatur Percakapan Khusus. Dalam Penemuan, implikatur digunakan oleh Andy F. Noya dan Jaya Suprana sebagai strategi untuk menyampaikan makna implisit terhadap pendengar untuk menjelaskan maksud pembicara, yang juga menyajikan penjelasan bagaimana makna tersirat dapat diutarakan oleh pembicara.dapat disimpulkan bahwa untuk memahami Implikatur Percakapan Khusus lebih sulit daripada Implikatur Percakapan Umum. Alasannya karena ( 1 ) para pendengar akan memahami makna dari ucapan jika mereka tahu konteksnya, dan ( 2 ) memiliki latar belakang pengetahuan atau pengetahuan sebelumnya. Peneliti menyarankan mahasiswa berikutnya yang bermaksud melanjutkan studi ini menggunakan sumber data yang menghubungkan Implikasi dan Gender dengan membandingkan implikatur yang digunakan oleh pria dan wanita. Berikutnya, untuk Program Studi Bahasa Inggris untuk menambah referensi yang berkaitan topik ini untuk membantu peneliti selanjutnya dalam analisis dari studi mereka. vii

4 55 REFERENCES Brown, P and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in Language Usage: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. New York: OxfordUniversity Press. Crystal, D. (1995). Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cummings, L. (1999). Pragmatics, A Multidiciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford Unniversity Press Inc. Grice, H. Paul. (1975) Logic and Conversation, in P. Cole and J.L. Morgan eds, Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. Grice, H. Paul. (1981) Presupposition and Conversational Implicature. New York: Academic Press. Grice, H. Paul. (1989) Studies In the Way of Words. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press. Lakoff, R. (1983). The limits of politeness : Therapeutic and classroom discourse. Multilingua 8: pp Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Conversational implicature. In Pragmatics pp Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Levinson, Stephen C. (2000) Presumptive Meanings the Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge. MA: MFF Press. Levinson, S. C. (1992). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Paltridge, B. (2000). Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Gold Coast.

5 56 Putri, Wakhana. (2010). An Analysis Of Implicature As Found In Transcript Of Interview Between Barack Obama And Hisyam Melhem From Al-Arabiya Tv. Andalas University Rankema, J. (1993). Discourse Studies: An Introducory Textbook. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Benjamins Publishing Company. Suprana, J.(2009). Ensiklopedi Kelirumologi. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo. Nanda, Sheila. (2012). Conversational Implicature Of The Presenters In Take Me Out Indonesia. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press

6 APPENDICES 57