BAB V KESIMPULAN, IMPLIKASI DAN REKOMENDASI

Transkripsi

1 BAB V KESIMPULAN, IMPLIKASI DAN REKOMENDASI A. Kesimpulan Berdasarkan uraian pada bab-bab sebelumnya, dapat ditarik kesimpulan seperti berikut. 1. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan computer anxiety (anticipation dan fear) secara parsial berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keahlian penggunaan komputer dalam penulisan skripsi mahasiswa. Hal itu ditunjukkan nilai rx 1 y sebesar 0,291. Nilai koefisien determinasi r 2 x 1 y atau besarnya sumbangan pengaruh X 1 terhadap Y adalah 0,084 dan t hitung sebesar 2,025 lebih besar dari t tabel sebesar 0, Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan computer attitude (optimism, pessimism, dan intimidation) secara parsial berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keahlian penggunaan komputer dalam penulisan skripsi mahasiswa. Hal itu ditunjukkan nilai rx 2 y sebesar 0,396. Nilai koefisien determinasi r 2 x 2 y atau besarnya sumbangan pengaruh X 2 terhadap Y adalah 0,149 dan t hitung sebesar 3,098 lebih besar dari t tabel sebesar 0, Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan computer anxiety (anticipation dan fear) dan computer attitude (optimism, pessimism, dan intimidation) secara simultan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keahlian penggunaan komputer dalam penulisan skripsi mahasiswa. Hal ini ditunjukkan nilai Ry(1,2) sebesar 0,343 lebih besar dari r tabel sebesar 0,198. Nilai koefisien determinasi (Adjusted R 2 ) sebesar 0,101. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan uji F diperoleh nilai F hitung sebesar 7,123. B. Implikasi Penelitian Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa kecemasan berkomputer dan sikap berkomputer berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keahlian penggunaan komputer. Sehubungan dengan itu, antisipasi dan sikap optimism dalam berkomputer perlu dipertahankan karena dua hal tersebut dapat meningkatkan keahlian penggunaan komputer. Sementara itu, rasa takut, sikap pessimism dan intimidation harus dikurangi karena dapat menghambat keahlian penggunaan komputer mahasiswa. C. Rekomendasi berikut. Berdasarkan kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian tersebut dapat diajukan saran-saran seperti 92

2 93 1. Untuk Mahasiswa Program Studi Akuntansi Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa keahlian penggunaan computer mahasiswa termasuk dalam kategori sedang. Sehubungan dengan itu, mahasiswa perlu meningkatkan keahlian penggunaan komputer dengan cara Mahasiswa perlu meningkatkan keahlian penggunaan berkomputer dengan sesuai dengan program yang digunakan, dan mengikuti kursus atau pelatihan sehingga rasa takut semakin berkurang. 2. Untuk Penelitian Selanjutnya Disarankan kepada peneliti selanjutnya untuk meneliti computer anxiety dan computer attitude dengan cara melakukan pengujian berdasarkan dimensi-dimensinya yakni: fear, anticipation, optimism, pessimism, dan intimidation sehingga dapat diketahui dengan jelas dari dimensi tersebut yang berpengaruh positif dan berpengaruh negatif terhadap keahlian penggunaan komputer.

3 DAFTAR PUSTAKA Agarwal, Rithu, V. Sambamurthy and R.M. Stair. (2000). Reserach Report: The Solving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment, Information Systems Research, Vol.11, No. 4. Ajzen, I dan Madden (2005). Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral control, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22, pp Ali, Syaiful, dan Fadila. (2008). Kecemasan Berkomputer (Computer Anxiety) dan Karakteristik Tipe Kepribadian pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi ke 11 Pontianak. Anderson, Α. (1996). Predictors of computer anxiety and performance in information systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(1), Assael, Henry (1998), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action. 6 th Ed. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing. Ayersman, D. J. (1996). Effects of Computer Instruction, Learning Style, Gender, and Experience on Computer Anxiety. Computers in the Schools, 12 (4), Azwar, S. (2003). Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset. Bandura, A. (2006). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. Batu, C., Arunachalam, N., dan Chandler Smith, B. (1996). A Review of the Construct of Computer Experience. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15, Bowers, D.A.J. and Bowers, V.M. (1996). Assessing and Coping with Computer Anxiety in the Social Science Class-room. Social Science Review (14:4), pp Bradley, G. and Russell, G. (1997). "Computer Experience, School Support, and Computer Anxiety," Educational Psychology (17:3), pp Broome, T., & Havelka, J Determinants Of Computer Anxiety In Business Students. The Review of Business Information Systems Volume 6, Number 2. Brosnan, M.J The Impact of Computer Anxiety and Self-efficacy Upon Performance, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 1998, pp Burkett, W.H., Compton, D.M. and Burkett, G.G. (2001). "An Examination of Computer Attitudes, Anxieties, and Aversions Among Diverse College Populations: Issues Central to Understanding Information Sciences in the New Millennium," Informing Science (4:3), pp

4 95 Chau, S. L., Chen, D. T., & Wong, F. L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates:a metaanalysis. Computers in Human Behavior,15, Chau, P. Y. K., dan Hu, P. J. (2002). Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physical Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp Cherrington, D.J. (1994). Organizational Behaviour. Second Edition. Allyn & Bacon. Comer, F. G., & Geissler, C. (1998). A Methodology for Software Evaluation. Proceedings of SITE 98, Washington, DC. Compeau, Deborah R. and C.A. Higgins (1995). Computer Self Efficacy: Development of Measure and Initial Test, MIS Quartely, Vol.19, No.12. Dhandung. (2004). Pengaruh Computer Anxiety Terhadap Keahlian Akuntan Pendidik Dalam Menggunakan Komputer. Skripsi. (Tidak Dipublikasikan). Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Doyle, E. (2005). Computer Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, Computer Experience: An investigation throughout a Computer Science degree. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 19 22, Elasmar, T, Charter, H. (1996). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), Emmons, B. A. (2003). Computer Anxiety, Communication Preferences, and Personality Type in the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University. First, Break All the Rules; Marcus Buckingham & Curt Coffman; The Gallup Organization, 1999 Fishman, B.J Characteristics of Students Related to Computermediated Communications Activity. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), Francis, J.J., Eccles, M.P., Johnston, M., Walker, A., Grimshaw, J., Foy, R., Kaner, E.F.S., Smith, L., dan Bonetti, D. (2004). Constructing Qustionnaires Based on The Theory of Planned Behaviour. A Manual for Health Services Researches. United Kingdom: Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources.

5 96 Ghozali, Imam. (2002). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS, Edisi Kedua. Semarang: BP-Undip (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program IBM SPSS 19. Semarang: Badang Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Harrison, A., & Rainer, K. (1992). An Examination of the Factor Structures and Concurrent Validities for the Computer Attitude Scale, the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Computer Selfefficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, Hao, Yang. (2006). Understanding Computer Anxiety and Computer Related Experience: The Model and Practices. State University of New York at Oswego Herdman, S. J. (2003). Discretionary Use of Computers: An Empirically Derived Explanatory Model. Decision Sciences, 22, (2004). Student teachers, computer anxiety, and computer experience. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(1), Horvat, J., Petric, G., & Mikrut, M. (2006). Measuring Computer and Web Attitudes Using Cas and Was Measurement Instruments, MIS Quarterly, 23, 2, pp Igbaria, M., & Parasuraman, S. (1989). A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety, and Attitudes Towards Microcomputers. Journal of Manage Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. J. (1996). A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), Indriantoro, Nur. (2000). Pengaruh Komputer Anxiety terhadap Keahlian Dosen dalam Pengunaan Komputer, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia. Vol.4, No.2. Indriantono, Nur, dan Supomo, Bambang. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta Jay, T.B. (2001) Computerphobia: What to do about it. Educational Technology, 21,

6 97 Kaplan, Harold I, Sadock, Benjamin J, & Grebb, Jack. A. (1997). Sinopsis Psikiatri. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara. Kountur, Ronny. (2004). Metode Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi dan Tesis, Jakarta: Penerbit PPM. Landry, Jr., R.M., Rogers, R.L., & Harrell, H.W. (1996). Computer Usage and Psychological Type Characteristics in Accounting Students. Journal of Accounting and Computers (Spring), 12. Loyd, B., & Gressard, C. (1984). Reliability and Factorial Validity of Computer Attitude Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, Marakas, G., Yi, M., & Johnson, R The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama. Mahar, D., Henderson, R., & Deane, F. (1997). The Effects of Computer Anxiety, State Anxiety, and Computer Experience on Users' Performance of Computerbased Tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 22(5), Maurer, M.M. (1994). Computer Anxiety Correlates and What They Tell Us: a literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, (10)3, Murphy, C.A., Coover, D. & Owen, S.V. (1989). Development and Validation of the Computer Self-efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, Oetting, E. R. (1983). Oetting's computer anxiety scale (COMPAS). Ft. Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Behavioral Science Institute. Orr. (2000). Barriers to the Treatment of Social Anxiety. Journal of Psychiatry, 1(57), Panagiotakopoulos, C., & Koustourakis, G. (2001). Dealing With 1 st Year University Students Computer Anxiety. Themes in Education, 2, 1,

7 98 Potosky, D., and Bobko, P. (1998). The computer understanding and experiences scale: a self-report measure of computer experience, Computers in Human Behavior, 14(2), 1998, pp Rifa, D., & Gudono. (1999). Pengaruh Faktor Demografi dan Personality terhadap keahlian dalam End User Computing. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, 2(1), Rosen, L.D., & Weil, M.M. (2010). Computers, Classroom Instruction, and the Computerphobic University Student. Collegiate Microcomputer, 8(4), Rustiana. (2004). Computer Self Efficacy (CSE) Mahasiswa Akuntansi Jurusan Ekonomi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi - Universitas Kristen Petra Saade, R.G., Kira, D. (2009). Computer Anxiety in E-Learning: The Effect of Computer Efficacy. Journal of Inoformation Technology Education, Vol. 8. Santoso, Singgih. (2006). SPSS Versi 18. Mengolah Data Statistik Secara Profesional. Jakarta. PT. Elex Media Komputindo. Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1992). Social anxiety and Selfpresentation: A Conceptualization and Model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, Sekaran, Uma. (2003). Research Methods for Business. Fourth Edition. New York: John Milley and Sons, Inc. Setyawati, Dyah Ratna. (2007). Pengaruh Faktor Computer Anxiety, Computer Attitude, dan Math Anxiety terhadap Keahlian dalam End User Computing (Survei pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta angkatan 2004 dan angkatan 2004). Skripsi (Tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Singarimbun, Masri & Effendi, Sofyan. (2004). Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta: LP3ES Stuart & Sundeen (1998). Buku Saku Keperawatan Jiwa, Edisi 3, Alih Bahasa Achir Yani, S. Hamid, Jakarta : EGC. Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta. Surachmad, Winarno. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta

8 99 Sweeney, B. dan Costell, F. (2009). Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision- Making : An Empirical Examination of Undergraduate Accounting and Business Students. Accounting Education : An International Journal, Vol. 18, No. I, 75-97, Februari Teguh, J. (2008). Pengaruh Computer Anxiety, Gender, dan Kurikulum Perguruan Tinggi Negeri terhadap Keahlian Penggunaan Komputer. Skripsi (Versi Elektronik). Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Brawijaya Malang. Towell, E.R. and Lauer, J. (2001). "Personality Differences and Computer Related Stress in Business Students," Mid-American Journal of Business (16:1), pp Ursavas, O.F., & Karal, H. (2009). Assessing Pre-Service Teachers Computer Phobia Levels in terms of Gender and Experience, Turkish Sample. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences 4:9 Venkatesh, V., Davis, E. (1996). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model, Information Systems Research. Vo.11, No.4. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., and Ackerman, P.L. (2000). A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision Making Processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, Wayne, D.H., & Macinnis, D.J. (2010). Consumer Behavior. Fifth Edition. NY: South-Western Cengage Learning. Woszczynski, A.B., Lazar, L.D., & Walker, J.M. (2010). Does Training Reduce Computer Anxiety? Wibowo, Tri, & Pancawati Hardiningsih. (2008). Pengaruh Faktor Personality dan Professional Commitment Terhadap Keahlian Audit. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Vol. 12. Yang, Hall, V.G. (1996). Making Decisions about Software for Classroom Use. Reading Research and Instruction, 38(3),