Teddy Mantoro teddy@ieee.org
No Jabatan Dosen Dosen Tetap 2014 Dosen Tetap 2015 Dosen Tetap 2016 Jumlah % Jumlah % Jumlah % 1 GURU BESAR 369 2 371 1,8 250 1,3 2 LEKTOR KEPALA 1736 9,4 1783 8,5 1375 6,9 3 LEKTOR 4333 23,5 4452 21,2 4239 21,2 4 ASISTEN AHLI 4188 22,7 4413 21 4695 23,5 5 TENAGA PENGAJAR 7819 42,3 9958 47,5 9408 47,1 Jumlah 18445 20977 19967 source: PDdikti, 25/10/2016
Fakta Dalam Tiga Tahun Terakhir 1. Jumlah Profesor Berkurang 2. Jumlah Lektor Kepala Berkurang 3. Jumlah Lektor Berkurang 4. Jumlah Asisten Ahli Bertambah 5. Jumlah Tenaga Pengajar Berkurang
Peningkatan Jabatan Dosen 1041 Asisten Ahli = 629 orang Lektor = 295 orang Lektor Kepala = 106 orang Profesor = 11 orang Peningkatan kualifikasi akademik dosen ke S3 144 Beasiswa PT Dalam Negeri = 127 orang Beasiswa PT Luar Negeri = 17 orang Pengembangan Karier dan penghargaan Dosen 335 Mutasi dosen = 330 orang Pemilihan Dosen Berprestasi = 5 orang
o Pengindeks bereputasi Jenis Indeks dan faktor dampak (IF) h-index dan g-index Penelitian Ilmiah Mencari bidang yang akan diteliti AI Method in Brief Jenis Publikasi karya ilmiah Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level) Penulisan Proposal dan publikasi Ilmiah Judul Abstract Introduction, methodology, etc. Contoh penelitian dan hasilnya
Menjelaskan tentang pengindeks bereputasi Membedakan Jenis Indeks dan faktor dampak (IF) Dapat menghitung h-index dan g-index Dapat menetapkan area yang akan diteliti Dapat menetapkan Idea pada suatu penelitian (Problem dan Solusi yang diusulkan) Mampu menulis papers yang memiliki strong references dan rendah similarity-score-nya. Mampu menghasilkan paper yang berpotensi di publikasi di jurnal Internasional bereputasi (Scopus dan WoS).
Variables: Author Area define by author Citations: All and the last 5 years h-index i10-index Total papers
Peneliti A +++ reputable papers: journal atau conf ber-if --- first author atau corresponding author ---- bahasa Indonesia Disiplin ilmu: Biologi Citations=660 h-index = 14 I10-index=18 Peneliti B --- reputable papers: journal atau conf ber-if +++ first author atau corresponding author +++ bahasa Indonesia Disiplin ilmu: Ilmu komputer Citations=1176 h-index = 17 I10-index=35
Peneliti A h-index=12 Docs=26 Citations=390 from 322 docs Peneliti B h-index=0 Docs=1 Citations=0 from 0 docs
Variables: Author Id ORCID # docs # Citations # docs yg mengutip h-index # co-authors Subject area Graph visualization
Variables: Jumlah Docs Jumlah sitasi Jumlah sitasi tanpa self-citation Citing-articles tanpa self-citation Rata-2 citation per paper h-index Graph visualization (ResearchID)
The h-index is an author-level metric that attempts to measure both the productivity and citation impact of the publications of a scientist or scholar. Proposed by Jorge E. Hirsch (2005). The index is a measure of the number of highly impactful papers a scientist has published. The larger the number of important papers, the higher the h-index, regardless of where the work was published. To calculate it, only two pieces of information are required: the total number of papers published (Np) and the number of citations (Nc) for each paper. The h-index is defined by how many h of a researcher s publications (Np) have at least h citations each. Source: http://www.benchfly.com/blog/h-index-what-it-is-and-how-to-find-yours/
The index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number greater than or equal to h, is a useful index to characterise the scientific output of a researcher. (JE Hirsch) The h-index is a measure of the number of publications published (productivity) as well as how often they are cited (impact). PRODUCTIVITY + IMPACT = INFLUENCE If your h-index is 15, you have 15 papers cited 15 times or more. If your h-index is 20, you have 20 papers cited 20 times or more.
Peneliti C Peneliti D H Kutipan/Sitasi Kutipan/Sitasi 1 386 145 2 247 40 3 313 27 4 37 18 5 26 14 6 0 5 7 0 5 Total 1109 257 h-index s weakness -- not consider: Type of author # papers # citations # span of time
The G-index was proposed by Leo Egghe in his paper "Theory and Practice of the G-Index" in 2006 as an improvement on the H-Index. G-Index is calculated this way: "[Given a set of articles] ranked in decreasing order of the number of citations that they received, the G- Index is the (unique) largest number such that the top g articles received (together) at least g^2 citations." (from Harzig's Publish or Perish Manual) Advantages of the G-Index: Accounts for the performance of author's top articles Helps to make more apparent the difference between authors' respective impacts. The inflated values of the G-Index help to give credit to lowly-cited or non-cited papers while giving credit for highlycited papers. Disadvantages of the G-Index: Introduced in 2006 and debate continues whether G-Index is superior to H-Index. Might not be as widely accepted as H-Index.
g-index s weakness -- not consider: Type of Author # papers # citations # span of time
Peneliti C N Kutipan/Sitasi Kumulatif Kutipan/Sitasi Peneliti D N x N N Kutipan/Sitasi Kumulatif Kutipan/Sitasi 1 386 386 1 1 145 145 1 2 247 633 4 2 40 185 4 3 313 946 9 3 27 212 9 4 37 983 16 4 18 230 16 5 26 1009 25 5 14 234 25 6 0 1009 36 6 5 239 36 7 0 1009 49 7 5 244 49 8 0 1009 64 8 1 245 64 9 0 1009 81 9 1 246 81 10 0 1009 100 10 1 247 100 11 0 1009 121 11 0 247 121 12 0 1009 144 12 0 247 144 13 0 1009 169 13 0 247 169 14 0 1009 196 14 0 247 196 15 0 1009 225 15 0 247 225 16 0 1009 256 16 0 247 256 17 0 1009 289 17 0 247 289 18 0 1009 324 18 0 247 324 19 0 1009 361 19 0 247 361 20 0 1009 400 20 0 247 400 21 0 1009 441 21 0 247 441 22 0 1009 484 22 0 247 484 23 0 1009 529 23 0 247 529 24 0 1009 576 24 0 247 576 25 0 1009 625 25 0 247 625 26 0 1009 676 26 0 247 676 27 0 1009 729 27 0 247 729 28 0 1009 784 28 0 247 784 29 0 1009 841 29 0 247 841 30 0 1009 900 30 0 247 900 31 0 1009 961 31 0 247 961 32 0 1009 1024 32 0 247 1024 33 0 1009 1089 33 0 247 1089 34 0 1009 1156 34 0 247 1156 h-index=5 g-index=31 h-index=5 g-index=15 N x N
Peneliti C Peneliti D H Kutipan/Sitasi Kutipan/Sitasi 1 386 145 2 247 40 3 313 27 4 37 18 5 26 14 6 0 5 7 0 5 Total 1109 257 i10-index s weakness -- not consider: Type of author # papers # citations # span of time